Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Yeah. Too bad. We are still making a good amount of money with our Java API for Flash/Flex. But we have nt added any new features in a while since mot of apps are more in maintenance mode. I would love to go back and hack of Flex/AIR again but demand has been really low for us lately. On 15

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Sure. But the world turned anti-Flash. If Flash == Adobe, then the world is anti-Adobe. Not a place a company wants to be… > On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Alain Ekambi wrote: > > Sure Flash/Flex was nt making lots of money for them. But still. I think > the are making

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Sure Flash/Flex was nt making lots of money for them. But still. I think the are making tons of money somewhere else. And nice ecosystem of devs is always nice for a company. Not sure if that would have hurt thier current business. This is such a great piece of then. It s really bad to see it

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Adobe does not make much (any?) money from Flash. If they only stand to gain bad press by pushing it, it’s not in their best interests. > On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Alain Ekambi wrote: > > Still wondering what s was the logic behind Adobe just Dumping Flex/Flash >

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Still wondering what s was the logic behind Adobe just Dumping Flex/Flash support like that. Still wondering ... On 15 March 2017 at 10:55, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Talking about our company (Codeoscopic), we continue with Flex since still > there's no other option in

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Talking about our company (Codeoscopic), we continue with Flex since still there's no other option in HTML world that give us the same we have in Flex world. It's not only about going HTML, is the productivity you loose in that world, and we can't move to another technology that is clearly a step

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Hi, We are a team of two peoples and we still actively use Flex (desktop and mobile) for our clients needs. Vincent. Le 15/03/2017 à 08:58, OK a écrit : Same here, the situation could be (always) better but it's much better than I've expected. We're still using AS3/Flex even for new apps

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

Same here, the situation could be (always) better but it's much better than I've expected. We're still using AS3/Flex even for new apps and as long there's at minimum one runtime environment available I have no concerns with it... Flex is to powerful to throw it way. Anyway, I think any kind of

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

I'm desapointed with adobe.. I think the player should be ported to webgl/canvas, instead of dropping the towel and forcing to adopt createjs and html divs/spans/debug on console.. (even if that requires a complete redesign/drop of mx/spark) Like FlexJS (with adobe help) is doing great efforts to

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

It’s about where I expected it to be. I really wish Chrome and Firefox were not trying to push it out as quickly as they are. I was actually expecting HTML to catch up faster than it is. It’s pathetic how slowly browsers are catching up to Flash. > On Mar 14, 2017, at 2:23 AM, Gary Yang

Re: I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

It's pretty much the same from my perspective. It could be a lot better, there is a lot of potential that Adobe does not see. On the other hand there still is a strong community with some very smart and creative people. I still use AS3 (mainly AIR) every day and we are even using it for brand new

I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago? Re: WebAsm?

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Clint M wrote: > might be best to make this a new thread > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > > > I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash > > Platform's situation today? is