Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Hi, @Kostas: Yes, it is a VOTE release candidate. @Chesnay: I agree. That's something we can fix with the first bugfix release. @Till, regarding FLINK-6646: This is definitively an ugly issue, because it breaks HA in many cases. I agree that it would be really nice to have this fixed asap. On

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might qualify as a blocker issue. The problem is that the yarn application files are managed by the ClusterClient. Due to that the ClusterClient deletes them if it shuts down. The ClusterClient shut down is also executed in case of a

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I tested the quickstarts, the SBT build, the PlanVisualizer, and the HistoryServer. I could not find any serious problems. However, we have to update the quickstart scripts, once 1.3 is released. Timo Am 24.05.17 um 16:05 schrieb Chesnay Schepler: I've found a small problem in the yarn

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I've found a small problem in the yarn user-jar handling. We recently added a switch to disable the user-jar inclusion in the class path, which isn't working. PR is open, but i wouldn't consider this a release-blocker. https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3979 On 24.05.2017 15:45, Kostas

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Thanks Robert for pushing this. This is going to be a voting RC? Kostas > On May 24, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > > Great! > The fixes are in, and I'm now building the RC2 (There are currently no > blockers in our JIRA) > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:37 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Great! The fixes are in, and I'm now building the RC2 (There are currently no blockers in our JIRA) On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Stefan Richter wrote: > I have fixes ready for both, FLINK-6690 and FLINK-6685, which I will merge > tomorrow. > > > Am 23.05.2017

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I have fixes ready for both, FLINK-6690 and FLINK-6685, which I will merge tomorrow. > Am 23.05.2017 um 21:05 schrieb Chesnay Schepler : > > It appears that rescaling is broken, I've filed > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6690 for that. > > needless to say,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

It appears that rescaling is broken, I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6690 for that. needless to say, this is a release blocker. On 23.05.2017 20:55, Robert Metzger wrote: I know I'm talking to myself here :) Anyways, I was running into some issues while creating the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I know I'm talking to myself here :) Anyways, I was running into some issues while creating the release (I was using master instead of the release-1.3 branch, which lead to some issues with the scala 2.10 / 2.11 switch). The RC2 is basically ready, however, there's at least one new blocker:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I've started building the RC. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > Gordon's PR has been merged. I forgot one blocking issue. Till created a > PR for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6328 > Once travis has passed, I'll merge that one and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Gordon's PR has been merged. I forgot one blocking issue. Till created a PR for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6328 Once travis has passed, I'll merge that one and then do the RC. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > Thanks a lot for

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Thanks a lot for doing the legal checks for the release. I'll create the first voting release candidate once https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3937 is merged. On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Xiaowei Jiang wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I did the following checks and found no

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Hi Robert, I did the following checks and found no issues: - Check if checksums and GPG files match the corresponding release files - Verify that the source archives do not contain any binaries - Check if the source release is building properly with Maven (including license header check

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Whoops, this is the PR for enabling the test: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3844 On 19.05.2017 12:14, Robert Metzger wrote: Thank you for all your input. @Chesnay, in your email you are pointing to the same PR twice: This PR fixes the compilation on Windows: (reviewed once, most

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Thank you for all your input. @Chesnay, in your email you are pointing to the same PR twice: This PR fixes the compilation on Windows: (reviewed once, most recent changes not reviewed) https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3854 This PR enables a test for savepoint compatibility: (nice to have,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I might have found another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6629. The issue is that the ClusterClient only allows to submit jobs to an HA cluster if you have specified the JobManager's address in the flink-conf.yaml or via the command line options. If no address is set, then

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

The test document says that the default flink-conf.yml "should define more than one task slot", but it currently configures exactly 1 task slot. Not sure if it is a typo in the doc though. On 18.05.2017 22:10, Chesnay Schepler wrote: The start-cluster.sh script failed for me on Windows when

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

The start-cluster.sh script failed for me on Windows when executed in a directory containing spaces. On 18.05.2017 20:47, Chesnay Schepler wrote: FLINK-6610 should also be fixed; it is currently not possible to disable web-submissions. On 18.05.2017 18:13, jincheng sun wrote: Hi Robert, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

FLINK-6610 should also be fixed; it is currently not possible to disable web-submissions. On 18.05.2017 18:13, jincheng sun wrote: Hi Robert, I have some checks to do and some test improve PRs ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6619) need be done soon. Best, SunJincheng 2017-05-18

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Hi Robert, I have some checks to do and some test improve PRs ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6619) need be done soon. Best, SunJincheng 2017-05-18 22:17 GMT+08:00 Greg Hogan : > The following tickets for 1.3.0 have a PR in need of review: > > [FLINK-6582]

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

The following tickets for 1.3.0 have a PR in need of review: [FLINK-6582] [docs] Project from maven archetype is not buildable by default [FLINK-6616] [docs] Clarify provenance of official Docker images > On May 18, 2017, at 5:40 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > > I have a couple

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I have a couple of PRs ready with bugfixes that I'll try to get in as well. Should be done soon. 2017-05-18 11:24 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann : > I'd like to get a fix in for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6612. This can basically > thwart > Flink's recovery

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I'd like to get a fix in for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6612. This can basically thwart Flink's recovery capabilities. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > This PR reduces logging noise a bit: (got +1 to merge) >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

This PR reduces logging noise a bit: (got +1 to merge) https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3917 This PR fixes the compilation on Windows: (reviewed once, most recent changes not reviewed) https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3854 This PR enables a test for savepoint compatibility: (nice to

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Hi Robert, There is one last pending fix for the serializer upgrades feature:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6482. Pending PR: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3937. I can’t say its a complete blocker, but since it will affect serialization format of checkpoints, it would be

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I will. Actually I had it already on my radar because its one of the three remaining blockers. Your JIRA has already a PR so I guess its on a good track, for the other blockers, I think its fine to release without having them fixed. Is there anything else we need to get into the 1.3.0 release?

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Robert, please add FLINK-6606 to the list of JIRAs that you're tracking, thanks. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > I totally forgot to post a document with testing tasks in the RC0 thread, > so I'll do it in the RC1 thread. > > Please use this

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

I totally forgot to post a document with testing tasks in the RC0 thread, so I'll do it in the RC1 thread. Please use this document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11WCfV15VwQNF-Rar4E0RtWiZw1ddEbg5WWf4RFSQ_2Q/edit# If I have the feeling that not enough people are seeing the document, I'll

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Thanks for the pointer. I'll keep an eye on the JIRA. I've gone through the JIRAs tagged with 1.3.0 yesterday to create a list of new features in 1.3. Feel free to add more / change it in the wiki:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Thanks Robert, Just for the record I think there are still some problems with incremental snapshots, I think Stefan is still working on it. I added some comments to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6537 Gyula Robert Metzger ezt írta (időpont: 2017. máj. 15., H,

[DISCUSS] Release 1.3.0 RC1 (Non voting, testing release candidate)

Hi Devs, This is the second non-voting RC. The last RC had some big issues, making it hard to start Flink locally. I hope this RC proves to be more stable. I hope to create the first voting RC by end of this week. - The