Thank you all for helping with the roadmap documentation.
I have merged the roadmap pull request.
Cheers,
Jark
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 15:26, Jing Ge wrote:
> Thanks Jark, +1 for the OLAP :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:04 PM Jark Wu wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I
Thanks Jark, +1 for the OLAP :-)
Best regards,
Jing
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:04 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have addressed another bunch of comments on the Google doc (mainly about
> the OLAP roadmap).
> And I have opened a pull request for the website:
>
+1 Thanks for all suggest. It looks great that in feature
Jark Wu 于2023年8月20日周日 23:03写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I have addressed another bunch of comments on the Google doc (mainly about
> the OLAP roadmap).
> And I have opened a pull request for the website:
>
Hi all,
I have addressed another bunch of comments on the Google doc (mainly about
the OLAP roadmap).
And I have opened a pull request for the website:
https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/672
Please help to review it and continue the discussion on the pull request,
thanks a lot!
Best,
Jark
Thanks for driving this, Jark.
The current draft looks good to me. I think it is good to open a PR with
it. And if there are other comments, we can discuss them during the PR
review.
I also added a few minor comments in the draft regarding the feature radar.
Those can also be discussed on the
Hi Jark,
Sounds good and I would love to, thanks! I will involve you and Xingtong on
the document after updating.
Best,
Shammon FY
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:39 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> Hi Shammon,
>
> Sure, could you help to draft a subsection about this in the google doc?
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
>
Hi Shammon,
Sure, could you help to draft a subsection about this in the google doc?
Best,
Jark
> 2023年8月14日 20:30，Shammon FY 写道：
>
> Thanks @Jark for driving the Flink Roadmap.
>
> As we discussed olap in the thread [1] and according to the suggestions from
> @Xingtong Song, could we add
Thanks @Jark for driving the Flink Roadmap.
As we discussed olap in the thread [1] and according to the suggestions
from @Xingtong Song, could we add a subsection in `Towards Streaming
Warehouses` or `Performance` that the short-lived query in Flink Session
Cluster is one of the future directions
Thank you everyone for helping polish the roadmap [1].
I think I have addressed all the comments and we have included all ongoing
parts of Flink.
Please feel free to take a last look. I'm going to prepare the pull request
if there are no more concerns.
Best,
Jark
[1]:
Sorry for taking so long
I've added a section about Flink Disaggregated State Management Evolution
in the attached doc.
I found some of the contents might be overlapped with the "large-scale
streaming jobs". So that part might need some changes as well.
Please let me know what you think.
Best
Sorry have missed this email and respond a bit late.
I will put a draft for the long-term vision for the state as well as
large-scale state support into the roadmap.
Best
Yuan
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jark Wu wrote:
> Hi Jiabao,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions. I have added them to
Hi Jiabao,
Thank you for your suggestions. I have added them to the "Going Beyond a
SQL Stream/Batch Processing Engine" and "Large-Scale State Jobs" sections.
Best,
Jark
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:06, Jiabao Sun
wrote:
> Thanks Jark and Martijn for driving this.
>
> There are two suggestions
Thanks Jark and Martijn for driving this.
There are two suggestions about the Table API:
- Add the JSON type to adapt to the no sql database type.
- Remove changelog normalize operator for upsert stream.
Best,
Jiabao
> 2023年7月13日 下午3:49，Jark Wu 写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for taking so long
Hi all,
Sorry for taking so long back here.
Martijn and I have drafted the first version of the updated roadmap,
including the updated feature radar reflecting the current state of
different components.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12BDiVKEsY-f7HI3suO_IxwzCmR04QcVqLarXgyJAb7c/edit
Feel
Hi Jark,
Fair enough. Let's do it like you suggested. Thanks!
Best regards,
Jing
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:00 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> Hi Jing,
>
> This thread is for discussing the roadmap for versions 1.18, 2.0, and even
> more.
> One of the outcomes of this discussion will be an updated version
Hi Jing,
This thread is for discussing the roadmap for versions 1.18, 2.0, and even
more.
One of the outcomes of this discussion will be an updated version of the
current roadmap.
Let's work together on refining the roadmap in this thread.
Best,
Jark
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 23:25, Jing Ge wrote:
Hi Jark,
Thanks for driving it! For point 2, since we are developing 1.18 now,
does it make sense to update the roadmap this time while we are releasing
1.18? This discussion thread will be focusing on the Flink 2.0 roadmap, as
you mentioned previously. WDYT?
Best regards,
Jing
On Thu, Jun 1,
Hi all,
Martijn and I would like to initiate a discussion on the Flink roadmap,
which should cover the project's long-term roadmap and the regular update
mechanism.
Xintong has already started a discussion about Flink 2.0 planning. One of
the points raised in that discussion is that we should
18 matches
Mail list logo
