[DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

Hi everybody, Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git repositories twice. Originally, it was not possible to force into the master branch. A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other branches. Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed

Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

+1 for protecting the master branch. I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there Gyula Fabian Hueske ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 13., Sze, 11:07): > Hi everybody, > > Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git repositories > twice. >

RE: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

+1 on the original style. Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature branch enable force pushing for flexible developing. -Original Message- From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyf...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject:

Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

+1 Important to protect the master. I think we should also protect Tags. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Gyula Fóra wrote: > +1 for protecting the master branch. > > I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there > > Gyula > > Fabian Hueske

Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

+1 for protecting the master branch. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang wrote: > +1 on the original style. > Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature branch > enable force pushing for flexible developing. > > -Original

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-3230) Kinesis streaming producer

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai created FLINK-3230: -- Summary: Kinesis streaming producer Key: FLINK-3230 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3230 Project: Flink Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-3229) Kinesis consumer with integration of Flink's checkpointing mechanics

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai created FLINK-3229: -- Summary: Kinesis consumer with integration of Flink's checkpointing mechanics Key: FLINK-3229 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3229

Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

@Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under rel? 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann : > +1 for protecting the master branch. > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang > wrote: > > > +1 on the original

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-3231) Handle Kinesis-side resharding in Kinesis streaming consumer

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai created FLINK-3231: -- Summary: Handle Kinesis-side resharding in Kinesis streaming consumer Key: FLINK-3231 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3231 Project:

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Combinable Annotation from DataSet API

Hi Fabian, thanks for bringing this issue up. I agree with you that it would be nice to remove the Combinable annotation if it is not really needed. Now if people are not aware of the Combinable interface then they might think that they are actually using combiners by simply implementing

Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

+1 On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > @Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under rel? > > 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann : > >> +1 for protecting the master branch. >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang

[DISCUSS] Remove Combinable Annotation from DataSet API

Hi everybody, As part of the upcoming 1.0 release we are stabilizing Flink's APIs. I would like to start a discussion about removing the Combinable annotation from the DataSet API. # The Current State: The DataSet API offers two interface for combine functions, CombineFunction and

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-3232) Add option to eagerly deploy channels

Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-3232: -- Summary: Add option to eagerly deploy channels Key: FLINK-3232 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3232 Project: Flink Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs

+1 on protecting the master > On 13 Jan 2016, at 14:46, Márton Balassi wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: >>> @Stephan: You mean all tags should be