Re:[VOTE] Release 1.5.0, release candidate #5

Hi, just one minor thing, I found the JIRA release notes seem a bit inconsistent with the this RC. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9058 hasn't been merged yet but included in the release notes, and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9070 has been merged but

[VOTE] Release 1.5.0, release candidate #5

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #5 for the version 1.5.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9415) Remove reference to StreamingMultipleProgramsTestBase in docs

Thomas Weise created FLINK-9415: --- Summary: Remove reference to StreamingMultipleProgramsTestBase in docs Key: FLINK-9415 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9415 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9414) Remove jline-terminal and jline-reader from LICENSE file

Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9414: Summary: Remove jline-terminal and jline-reader from LICENSE file Key: FLINK-9414 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9414 Project: Flink Issue

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9413) Tasks can fail with PartitionNotFoundException if consumer deployment takes too long

Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9413: Summary: Tasks can fail with PartitionNotFoundException if consumer deployment takes too long Key: FLINK-9413 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9413

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.0, release candidate #4

Since we need a new build, can we also include: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9402 Thanks, Thomas On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > There is another blocker which we should fix with the new RC [1]. There is > already a PR for the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.0, release candidate #4

There is another blocker which we should fix with the new RC [1]. There is already a PR for the problem. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9408 Cheers, Till On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > Unfortunately, I have to revise my vote to

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9411) Support parquet rolling sink writer

mingleizhang created FLINK-9411: --- Summary: Support parquet rolling sink writer Key: FLINK-9411 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9411 Project: Flink Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9410) Replace NMClient with NMClientAsync in YarnResourceManager

Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9410: Summary: Replace NMClient with NMClientAsync in YarnResourceManager Key: FLINK-9410 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9410 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9409) Missing assembly-dependencies in flink-dist/pom.xml

Nico Kruber created FLINK-9409: -- Summary: Missing assembly-dependencies in flink-dist/pom.xml Key: FLINK-9409 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9409 Project: Flink Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9408) Retry JM-RM connection in case of explicit disconnect

Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9408: Summary: Retry JM-RM connection in case of explicit disconnect Key: FLINK-9408 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9408 Project: Flink Issue

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.0, release candidate #4

Unfortunately, I have to revise my vote to -1, because we found a bug in the request partition state RPC call [1]. This bug lets certain batch jobs fail. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9406 Cheers, Till On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Weise wrote: >

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9406) Request finished partition state fails due to referential equality comparison

Till Rohrmann created FLINK-9406: Summary: Request finished partition state fails due to referential equality comparison Key: FLINK-9406 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9406 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2)

+1 Am 22.05.18 um 10:49 schrieb Ted Yu: +1 Original message From: Chesnay Schepler Date: 5/22/18 1:12 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2) Hello, since no concerns have been raised in the discussion

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2)

+1 On 22/05/18 10:12, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > Hello, > > since no concerns have been raised in the discussion about enabling > GitBox [1] I'm opening this vote to make things official. > > Please vote on enabling GitBox integration for the flink and flink-web > repositories as follows: > > [

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2)

+1 Original message From: Chesnay Schepler Date: 5/22/18 1:12 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2) Hello, since no concerns have been raised in the discussion about enabling GitBox [1] I'm opening this

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2)

+1 On 22/05/18 10:12, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > Hello, > > since no concerns have been raised in the discussion about enabling > GitBox [1] I'm opening this vote to make things official. > > Please vote on enabling GitBox integration for the flink and flink-web > repositories as follows: > > [ ]

[VOTE] Enable GitBox integration (#2)

Hello, since no concerns have been raised in the discussion about enabling GitBox [1] I'm opening this vote to make things official. Please vote on enabling GitBox integration for the flink and flink-web repositories as follows: [ ] +1, Approve GitBox [ ] -1, Do not approve GitBox (please

[CANCELED][VOTE] Enable GitBox integration

That's a good point, I'll start another vote. Let's stick to the existing process. On 22.05.2018 09:49, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: -1 The only reason why -1 is I don't see a point in enabling issues for flink-web. We already track them in Jira and I think adding another channel for it will make

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitBox integration

-1 The only reason why -1 is I don't see a point in enabling issues for flink-web. We already track them in Jira and I think adding another channel for it will make tracking issues only harder. With issues disabled for flink-web I vote +1. On 22/05/18 09:32, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > Hello, > >

[VOTE] Enable GitBox integration

Hello, since no concerns have been raised in the discussion about enabling GitBox [1] I'm opening this vote to make things official. Please vote on enabling GitBox integration for the flink and flink-web repositories as follows: [ ] +1, Approve GitBox [ ] -1, Do not approve GitBox (please

Increasing Disk Read Throughput and IOPS

Hi All, We are running flink in AWS and we are observing a strange behavior. We are using docker containers, EBS for storage and Rocks DB state backend. We have a few map and value states with checkpointing every 30 seconds and incremental checkpointing turned on. The issue we are noticing is the