Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-17 Thread Daniel Collins
> would the repository ... be removed ... ? Yes, I would remove it once it is merged into a version of flink that is supported by GCP dataproc. It exists now (and I am creating releases and maven artifacts for it) to unblock users in the interim period. -Daniel On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 3:32 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-16 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Daniel, > I don't know how to get to this point, it sounds like more of an organizational constraint than a technical one though- who is responsible for the same role for the standard Pub/Sub connector? I'm working with the Pub/Sub team right now on prioritization of supporting the flink

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-13 Thread Daniel Collins
Hi all, Thank you for the feedback. Responses inline. > we need feedback from a Committer who would review and help maintain it going forward. Ideally, this Committer would guide one or more contributors from Google to Committership so that Google could step up and maintain Flink 's PubSub and

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-13 Thread Etienne Chauchot
Hi all, I agree with Konstantin, mentoring is important especially on this new connector framework. Long time maintenance is even more important. I could not mentor you on this topic because I'm not a committer on the Flink project and because I don't know Pub/Sub tech. That being said I

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-09 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi Daniel, I think, it would be great to have a PubSub Lite Connector in Flink. Before you put this proposal up for a vote, though, we need feedback from a Committer who would review and help maintain it going forward. Ideally, this Committer would guide one or more contributors from Google to

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-08 Thread Etienne Chauchot
Hi, I agree with Ryan, even if clients might be totally different the backend technologies are the same so hosting them in the same repo makes sense. Similar thinking made us put all the Cassandra related connectors in the same cassandra repo. Etienne Le 02/03/2023 à 14:43, Daniel Collins

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-02 Thread Daniel Collins
Hello Ryan, Unfortunately there's not much shared logic between the two- the clients have to look fundamentally different since the Pub/Sub Lite client exposes partitions to the split level for repeatable reads. I have no objection to this living in the same repo as the Pub/Sub connector, if

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-02 Thread Ryan Skraba
Hello Daniel! Quite a while ago, I started porting the Pub/Sub connector (from an existing PR) to the new source API in the new flink-connector-gcp-pubsub repository [PR2]. As Martijn mentioned, there hasn't been a lot of attention on this connector; any community involvement would be

[DISCUSS] FLIP-299 Pub/Sub Lite Connector

2023-03-01 Thread Daniel Collins
Hello all, I'd like to start an official discuss thread for adding a Pub/Sub Lite Connector to Flink. We've had requests from our users to add flink support, and are willing to maintain and support this connector long term from the product team. The proposal is