+1 (non-binding)
Sergey Nuyanzin 于2022年12月18日周日 15:42写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:06 PM David Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser <
> martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:06 PM David Anderson wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
> >
> > If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
>
> If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update
> our Scala 2.12 version (see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As
Hi all,
I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update our
Scala 2.12 version (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As
explained before in the discussion thread, that means that we would break
binary &
@Nick Have you checked whether this really affects Flink`?
Asking since the regressions doesn't categorically affect every mixed
code base.
On 13/06/2022 16:50, Nick wrote:
I think upgrading to 2.12.15 would be the correct choice, as 2.12.16 has a
known regression for projects compiled with
I think upgrading to 2.12.15 would be the correct choice, as 2.12.16 has a
known regression for projects compiled with Java & Scala, which Flink does:
https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.12.16
This regression will be addressed in a few months via 2.12.17, so for now
2.12.15 should be
+1 (binding)
Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao :
> +1 non-binding
>
> for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know
> about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
> btw, the configuration
> of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match
+1 non-binding
for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know
about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
btw, the configuration
of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8, target-11 jvm
format.
Martijn Visser 于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道：
> Hi
Hi everyone,
As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread for updating
Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there will be a
binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed.
For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that best fits
with
