Hi all,
as promised, I have updated the Gelly roadmap [1].
Below, I am describing and reasoning about the changes I made. Please, let
me know whether you agree and if you have any other ideas for further
improvements and feature additions.
*1. Operators for highly skewed graphs*:
I have removed
On 03 Jun 2015, at 23:51, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
It may make sense to link the JIRAs from the roadmap, or add comments what
people are working on and what is in the queue.
Linking JIRAs from the roadmap would solve all these points. ;) So +1 for issue
links.
Hey,
yes, this is kind of an ambitious and long-term roadmap :)
As Andra said, tasks 1-2-3-4 are already work in progress.
Regarding the rest, we could discuss on the priority or leave it on the
personal interest of contributors.
Personally, I think bipartite support should be quite easy to add
Wow, this is an extremely big and ambitious roadmap.
Are all these things realistically possible in the foreseeable future? Or
is this more a wish-list?
Do you have an idea what issues to approach in what order?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Andra Lungu lungu.an...@gmail.com wrote:
The
:-D
Great!
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Andra Lungu lungu.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kostas,
We're way ahead of you! The first draft of the blog post is internally
reviewed as we speak ;)
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Kostas Tzoumas ktzou...@apache.org
wrote:
This is very cool!
Thanks, Stephan!
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
All right, you should have permissions now.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Andra Lungu lungu.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sure, but first I need permissions! :)
*NOTE*: Due to spamming, we can not give
All right, you should have permissions now.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Andra Lungu lungu.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, but first I need permissions! :)
*NOTE*: Due to spamming, we can not give every confluence user edit
permissions to the wiki. Just write to the dev@flink.apache.org
The Roadmap is now available as a wiki page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Gelly
We're still happy to hear comments/suggestions, if any :)
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Andra Lungu lungu.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Stephan!
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:42 PM,
Apache TinkerPop made it to the wish-list :)
Thanks, Fabian!
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Flavio Pompermaier pomperma...@okkam.it
wrote:
You're definitely right Fabian +1
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Fabian Hueske fhue...@gmail.com wrote:
Integration with Apache TinkerPop3 could
Integration with Apache TinkerPop3 could also be interesting.
TinkerPop3 is an API for transactional and analytical graph processing and
supported by several Graph engines/databases.
It might be interesting to see if/how Gelly's and TinkerPop's concepts
match and think about whether it makes
Hello everyone,
thank you Andra for putting together this nice document and for sharing!
Gelly is already in a state that matches the basic functionality of
existing distributed graph libraries. We're very happy for this and also
very grateful to everyone who has contributed so far!
We are also
Hi,
Great job putting together this roadmap!
Regarding 1) you may find this work relevant:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00626v1
Regarding 2) the semi-streaming model allows polylog(n) passes.
If you allow only one pass, it's a streaming model.
In addition, I think models such as the
12 matches
Mail list logo
