David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>
>>We have now been allocated a zone on the new server.
>>So we need to define our goals and then start setting up
>>some demo servers. We should get out of this RT thread
>>and start planning. But lets concentrate on the 0.7
>>release first.
>
>
>
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
We have now been allocated a zone on the new server.
So we need to define our goals and then start setting up
some demo servers. We should get out of this RT thread
and start planning. But lets concentrate on the 0.7
release first.
What do people t
On Jue, 26 de Mayo de 2005, 5:49, David Crossley dijo:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> We have now been allocated a zone on the new server.
>> So we need to define our goals and then start setting up
>> some demo servers. We should get out of this RT thread
>> and start planning. But lets concentrate on
David Crossley wrote:
> We have now been allocated a zone on the new server.
> So we need to define our goals and then start setting up
> some demo servers. We should get out of this RT thread
> and start planning. But lets concentrate on the 0.7
> release first.
What do people think about setting
We have now been allocated a zone on the new server.
So we need to define our goals and then start setting up
some demo servers. We should get out of this RT thread
and start planning. But lets concentrate on the 0.7
release first.
--David
Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> I agree with David that we should use the forthcoming zones to do these
> experiments. David, will we be able to do load testing in this zone?
I presume so, but we should ask at ASF Infrastructure.
> Another problem I see with live hosting is that all the error reporting
>
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
ATM I am only concerned about making Forrest
genuinely useful as a live server, which IMO is a blocker for any
serious request to infra.
Are you saying Forrest is not up to performing as a serious live server
right now? If I understood that right, why would that be the cas
>> ATM I am only concerned about making Forrest
>> genuinely useful as a live server, which IMO is a blocker for any
>> serious request to infra.
Are you saying Forrest is not up to performing as a serious live server
right now? If I understood that right, why would that be the case?
Regards,
Tor
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> One thing I like about Forrest is that it's not only a static site
> generation engine, but it's capable of serving the site live. Changes
> are instantaneous, bandwith is perserved, and dynamic content can be
> employed.
>
> IMHO every Apache project that produce
David Crossley wrote:
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
Nicola,
My goal is to put a live Forrest on ASF infrastructure instead of the
bot and have that serve all Forrest-based sites in Apache, comprising
Lenya.
Sounds good. Let me know if you need any help or input from us.
Are you subsribed to [EMAIL PROTE
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Nicola,
>
> > My goal is to put a live Forrest on ASF infrastructure instead of the
> > bot and have that serve all Forrest-based sites in Apache, comprising
> > Lenya.
>
> Sounds good. Let me know if you need any help or input from us.
>
> Are you subsribed to [EMAIL
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
One thing I like about Forrest is that it's not only a static site
generation engine, but it's capable of serving the site live. Changes
are instantaneous, bandwith is perserved, and dynamic content can be
employed.
IMHO every Apache project that produces something it
I am still away on holidays, so it is hard to reply properly.
Thanks to Nicola Ken for starting the discussion. We have
been waiting for years for this to happen.
I reckon that we don't need to come up will *all* of
the answers before asking ASF infrastructure for the
machine. That is the reason
Nicola,
> My goal is to put a live Forrest on ASF infrastructure instead of the
> bot and have that serve all Forrest-based sites in Apache, comprising
> Lenya.
Sounds good. Let me know if you need any help or input from us.
Are you subsribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is a rush for
Solaris zones
I think it would be very useful to do the tests you suggested to get
some first hand figures on performance and stability and learn more
about the practical details of running it.
Most of all because I expect all the happy Forrest clients (that are
using static Forrests now?!) to ask for the dyna
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Apache is getting more hardware donated lately, so it may be that we
> get to use it. In any case, I don't want to ask for the usage of it if
> we don't yet know what to do with it, hence the RT.
Before making the full move and serve the websites entirely dynamically,
> Apache is getting more hardware donated lately, so it may be that we
> get to use it. In any case, I don't want to ask for the usage of it if
> we don't yet know what to do with it, hence the RT.
Before making the full move and serve the websites entirely dynamically,
how about providing a Forre
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
Whilst I totally agree with the sentiment of this RT, can I ask one
simple question before even starting on this discussion:
Where will we be able to host a live version of Forrest?
Apache is getting more hardware donated lately, so it may be tha
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
Whilst I totally agree with the sentiment of this RT, can I ask one
simple question before even starting on this discussion:
Where will we be able to host a live version of Forrest?
Apache is getting more hardware donated lately, so it may be that we get
to use it. In any
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
One thing I like about Forrest is that it's not only a static site
generation engine, but it's capable of serving the site live. Changes
are instantaneous, bandwith is perserved, and dynamic content can be
employed.
IMHO every Apache project that produces something it
One thing I like about Forrest is that it's not only a static site
generation engine, but it's capable of serving the site live. Changes
are instantaneous, bandwith is perserved, and dynamic content can be
employed.
IMHO every Apache project that produces something it can use for itself
*shoul
21 matches
Mail list logo
