One thing we did not had before in any release is that we have some
maven artifacts in our svn rep.
whiteboard/cocoon-2.2-blocks
Are we going to deploy those to the maven rep?
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler
Open Source Java
Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad
de la Información,
>> Tim indicated that this was "housekeeping" which I took to mean the
>> normal due diligence on a release.
>
> Yes, but i marked it as Blocker (same process as i did for the previous
> releases) because a release should not be rolled until the situation is
> suitable.
This is fairly trivial, but
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> 2009/11/24 David Crossley :
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> David Crossley wrote:
>>> > Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> >> David Crossley wrote:
>>> >> > Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> >> >> Tim Williams wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > FOR-855 verify the license s
2009/11/24 David Crossley :
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> > Ross Gardler wrote:
>> >> David Crossley wrote:
>> >> > Ross Gardler wrote:
>> >> >> Tim Williams wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release
>> >> >> > - housekeeping
>> >> >
Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Ross Gardler wrote:
> >> David Crossley wrote:
> >> > Ross Gardler wrote:
> >> >> Tim Williams wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release
> >> >> > - housekeeping
> >> >>
> >> >> I believe Davids work with R
2009/11/23 David Crossley :
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> > Ross Gardler wrote:
>> >> Tim Williams wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release
>> >> > - housekeeping
>> >>
>> >> I believe Davids work with RAT fixes this issue.
>> >
>> > No
Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Ross Gardler wrote:
> >> Tim Williams wrote:
> >> >
> >> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release
> >> > - housekeeping
> >>
> >> I believe Davids work with RAT fixes this issue.
> >
> > No it does not. There is much more to the j
2009/11/21 David Crossley :
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Tim Williams wrote:
>> >
>> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release
>> > - housekeeping
>>
>> I believe Davids work with RAT fixes this issue.
>
> No it does not. There is much more to the job that that.
I meant that running
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> >
> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release
> > - housekeeping
>
> I believe Davids work with RAT fixes this issue.
No it does not. There is much more to the job that that.
> > FOR-1177 ? ? ? ?where does forrest use Rhino
>
> Not
2009/11/20 Tim Williams :
> Devs,
> The following are the issues considered "blockers". I feel
> comfortable moving others under lazy consensus to the next release,
> but I felt there was a higher burden for these. I figure if someone
> thought they blocked at the time, then I reckon they should
Tim Williams wrote:
>
> The following are the issues considered "blockers". I feel
> comfortable moving others under lazy consensus to the next release,
Oh, good on you Tim. I meant to say something a few days ago
when you started to review the Issues situation. That is what
it takes to start thi
Devs,
The following are the issues considered "blockers". I feel
comfortable moving others under lazy consensus to the next release,
but I felt there was a higher burden for these. I figure if someone
thought they blocked at the time, then I reckon they should get a
say... Anyway, can you peruse
12 matches
Mail list logo
