We should be able to sort something out for the future.
There is some discussion recently at Apache Incubator
which would help.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/9368/focus=9628
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/9651
and there was the previous t
Tim Williams wrote:
> I don't recall any resolution on a new format with the "future of..."
> thread. We've missed the 1-week away announcement and subsequent
> "reminders". Is it fair to say it's cancelled this time around?
Ah, i just now had the same thought and dealt with it
in the other thre
We have not yet reached a conclusion and no-one
has co-ordinated this month's Forrest Friday,
so today's event is not happening.
-David
> I don't recall any resolution on a new format with the "future of..."
> thread. We've missed the 1-week away announcement and subsequent
> "reminders". Is it fair to say it's cancelled this time around?
>
> --tim
>
Wow, didn't that come round quick!
Well, I missed it too, but I can be avail
I don't recall any resolution on a new format with the "future of..."
thread. We've missed the 1-week away announcement and subsequent
"reminders". Is it fair to say it's cancelled this time around?
--tim
Tim Williams wrote:
I think it's unfair to suggest that the communication medium had any
effect on the XHTML2 debacle. I think the disagreement would have
occurred regardless of it being on irc, email, or even skype.
I did not say that the disagreement was *caused*, or even contributed to
by
On 6/26/06, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
...
> It is now time to assess whether we want to continue.
> I have been wanting to raise this issue for a while
> The discussion at Incubator [2] spurred me.
>
> Is it successful for us at Apache Forrest?
Success can b
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El mar, 27-06-2006 a las 01:09 +0800, Gav escribió:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(well, if Australia can pull off a stormer today - curently 0-0)
Ross
Bummer, and I stayed up for it.
It's an outrage
It was indeed
and I refuse to work into a Friday evening
(family time).
Therefore, I am excluded from much of Forrest Friday. Others are in a
similar posisiton.
We had a couple of discussions about what day and
start time. I know Ross didn't prefer Friday, but the
consensus was that Friday going into Sa
Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> At present we have a free-for-all with respect to time. So in order to
> ensure one is online when something important is being discussed one has
> to be present for 24 hours - not good. At least with the shorter
> sessions one can be present or can veto the discussion. T
El mar, 27-06-2006 a las 01:09 +0800, Gav escribió:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > (well, if Australia can pull off a stormer today - curently 0-0)
> >
> > Ross
>
> Bummer, and I stayed up for it.
>
> It's an outrage
>
> Gav...
day
> afternoons are difficult and I refuse to work into a Friday evening
> (family time).
>
> Therefore, I am excluded from much of Forrest Friday. Others are in a
> similar posisiton.
We had a couple of discussions about what day and
start time. I know Ross didn't prefe
One other thing that i want to add. I am concerned
that the running of the IRC sessions is being mainly
left to me. If it is always me that is co-ordinating,
reminding people that it is on, being the operator,
ensuring the logfiles, etc. then we have a weak point.
-David
maybe we should not try to make major decisions on the future of some
> aspects of forrest via IRC and those that participate at the time.
We agreed on this even before we started any Forrest Friday.
It is mentioned twice on http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
-David
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Gav escribi??:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > >
> > > Can we address the concern about the summaries?
> >
> > No single person should be responsible for the summaries as has been
> > mentioned. Having more than one person at the same time working on a summary
> > also
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (well, if Australia can pull off a stormer today - curently 0-0)
>
> Ross
Bummer, and I stayed up for it.
It's an outrage
Gav...
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free E
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El lun, 26-06-2006 a las 21:45 +0800, Gav escribió:
from Thorsten...
4. - During the session discussion is limited to the identified issues and
social chat. Anything else is deemed off topic and moved to the mailing
list.
Agreed. (woohoo, short answer)
Dunno
of us who are comfortable with how Forrest works.
Gav has reminded us that Forrest Friday is about enabling newcomers to
participate in development too.
Having said that. There is, IMHO, no substitute for siting down with the
code and working things out the "hard" way. That is, worki
M
> > To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> > Subject: future of Forrest Friday get togethers
> >
> > (chair-hat=on ... no big deal, it means that the
> > views are not necessarily my personal opinion. They are
> > concerns that i am raising as the chair.)
> >
> &g
Replying to the original post, but I'll try and reply to other comments
also.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 26 June 2006 2:00 PM
> To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> Subject: future of Forrest Friday get togethers
>
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
I really like the idea of shorter session on specific points (some
FOR to be resolved for instance).
It is worth noting that my suggestion was based on a discussion I had
with Paul (at least I think it was Paul) in the second or third Forrest
Friday. He works
Hi,
As usual, the perception of Ross and David is very pertinent indeed.
I really like the idea of shorter session on specific points (some
FOR to be resolved for instance). (Maybe we will have time problems - I
mean between Europe and Australia :-P ?)
With this approach, we may bene
Thanks David for raising this. It has been on the back of my mind
(quite crowded with personal stuff atm) for a while.
And thanks Ross for your excellent analysis and the proposal.
I fully agree with your views and very much like the proposed
alternative.
-0 for having any more Fridays current st
David Crossley wrote:
...
It is now time to assess whether we want to continue.
I have been wanting to raise this issue for a while
The discussion at Incubator [2] spurred me.
Is it successful for us at Apache Forrest?
Success can be measured in two ways:
1) development progress
2) communit
(chair-hat=on ... no big deal, it means that the
views are not necessarily my personal opinion. They are
concerns that i am raising as the chair.)
When we started our Forrest Friday monthly IRC get togethers,
we tried to address the long-standing ASF concerns about
mailing lists being the primary
David Crossley wrote:
> The channel name is #for-june on irc.freenode.net
>
> See http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
Forrest Friday IRC is still happening. The Australian
contingent is awake.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060609-log.txt
-David
The channel name is #for-june on irc.freenode.net
See http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
-David
I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
the job of co-ordinator. Only 3 days to go.
9 June starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
medium is still the dev
The channel name is #for-may on irc.freenode.net
See http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
-David
Well it looks like SVN will not be back for another 12 hours.
General mail services seem to be smooth now.
Our ForrestFriday is due to start in a bit over one hour.
I reckon that it is worth continuing, even without SVN.
We have the dev mail list and Jira and IRC and our own
svn working copies.
A reminder that there is exactly 24 hours to go.
If the SVN server is still having troubles tomorrow
then we will need to postphone ForrestFriday.
Three cheers for the volunteers at Apache Infrastructure
who have side-lined their other important tasks
to assist with the issues.
http://article.gma
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribi??:
> > David Crossley a ??crit :
> > >
> > > 12 May starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> > > See the calendar for your time zone.
> > > http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
> >
> > Ok, I will be around.
>
> Me too, but will have
El mar, 09-05-2006 a las 10:59 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió:
> le 08/05/2006 04:03 David Crossley a écrit :
> > I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
> > the job of co-ordinator. Only 4 days to go.
> >
> > 12 May starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> > See the calendar for your
le 08/05/2006 04:03 David Crossley a écrit :
I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
the job of co-ordinator. Only 4 days to go.
12 May starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 8 May 2006 10:04 AM
> To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> Subject: Forrest Friday - 12 May 2006
>
> I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
> the job of co-ordinator. Only 4
David Crossley wrote:
I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
the job of co-ordinator. Only 4 days to go.
I'll be around for some of the day, but stll do not have Internet at my
office (long story). I will be checking in periodically, mostly in the
morning.
Ross
On 5/7/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
the job of co-ordinator. Only 4 days to go.
12 May starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventio
I will be around this Friday, so i will take on
the job of co-ordinator. Only 4 days to go.
12 May starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
medium is still the dev
Thanks very much for your effort there Tim.
I see that you had to be awake when you should
have been asleep. Otherwise it seems that all went
smoothly. Not so scary after all, eh.
Tim Williams wrote:
> Does anyone see a problem with making all committers an op for FF?
> I'm obviously not that fam
Ok, found it.
On 10/03/06, Paul Bolger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the channel name this month?
>
>
> On 10/03/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We're about 13 hours out now...
> > --tim
> >
> > On 3/2/06, Tim W
Paul Bolger wrote:
What's the channel name this month?
FOR-MAR
Ross
What's the channel name this month?
On 10/03/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're about 13 hours out now...
> --tim
>
> On 3/2/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than a week awa
Does anyone see a problem with making all committers an op for FF?
I'm obviously not that familiar with IRC but in reading [1] it seems
that it's good to have more than one for channel stability. We're
lucky enough to already have a system in place that allows us to
determine who to trust. Now b
On Thursday 09 March 2006 8:55 am, Tim Williams wrote:
> We're about 13 hours out now...
> --tim
should have started by now, no?
Diwaker
>
> On 3/2/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than
The channel is for-mar
Cheche, can you please let Jenny know?
--tim
We're about 13 hours out now...
--tim
On 3/2/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than a week away now.
>
> http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
>
> Mark your calendars.
>
> http://www.timeandda
On 3/8/06, Gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have we sorted out who is going to run the channel yet.?
>
> I will be there at various stages and hope to get some more stuff done.
> Hoping I can get forrest working on new computer by then!
>
> Gav...
I'll be the channel operator this friday.
--ti
quot;[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ;
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: Forrest Friday -10 March - Reminder/Topic Solicitation
On 3/2/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than a week away now.
http://forrest.apache.or
On 3/2/06, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than a week away now.
>
> http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
>
> Mark your calendars.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2006&a
Tim Williams wrote:
Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than a week away now.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
Mark your calendars.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2006&month=03&day=10&hour=6&min=0&sec=0
In the mean t
Forrest Friday is rapidly approaching, little more than a week away now.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
Mark your calendars.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2006&month=03&day=10&hour=6&min=0&sec=0
In the mean time, use this thread
Tim Williams wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > The next ForrestFriday is about two weeks away.
> >
> > I cannot be the operator, so someone else needs
> > to take over.
> >
> > I might still get to participate a bit
> > depending on hotel net access.
> >
> > There are notes for the "operator" at
>
Tim Williams wrote:
On 2/22/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The next ForrestFriday is about two weeks away.
I cannot be the operator, so someone else needs
to take over.
I might still get to participate a bit
depending on hotel net access.
There are notes for the "operator" at
On 2/22/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The next ForrestFriday is about two weeks away.
>
> I cannot be the operator, so someone else needs
> to take over.
>
> I might still get to participate a bit
> depending on hotel net access.
>
> There are notes for the "operator" at
> http://
David Crossley wrote:
The next ForrestFriday is about two weeks away.
I cannot be the operator, so someone else needs
to take over.
I might still get to participate a bit
depending on hotel net access.
There are notes for the "operator" at
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
I will
El jue, 23-02-2006 a las 12:14 +1100, David Crossley escribió:
> The next ForrestFriday is about two weeks away.
>
> I cannot be the operator, so someone else needs
> to take over.
I can be operator but like experience have shown my internet connection
is not the most stable one.
salu2
--
thors
The next ForrestFriday is about two weeks away.
I cannot be the operator, so someone else needs
to take over.
I might still get to participate a bit
depending on hotel net access.
There are notes for the "operator" at
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
-David
David Crossley wrote:
> 10 February starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> See the calendar for your time zone.
> http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
>
> Channel name is #for-feb on irc.freenode.net
>
> So starting in about 45 minutes.
>
> Topic ...
> Finish locationmap, clean up Jir
El vie, 10-02-2006 a las 16:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Author: crossley
> Date: Fri Feb 10 08:30:04 2006
> New Revision: 376758
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=376758&view=rev
> Log:
> Update
>
> Modified:
> forrest/events/forrest-fri
10 February starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
Channel name is #for-feb on irc.freenode.net
So starting in about 45 minutes.
Topic ...
Finish locationmap, clean up Jira,
prioritise issues for next release, Dis
El mié, 08-02-2006 a las 19:20 +1100, David Crossley escribió:
> 10 February starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> See the calendar for your time zone.
> http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
>
> So about 45 hours away.
>
> This is the topic from last time ...
> Finish locationmap, cle
David Crossley wrote:
10 February starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
So about 45 hours away.
This is the topic from last time ...
Finish locationmap, clean up Jira,
prioritise issues for next release, Dispatc
10 February starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
So about 45 hours away.
This is the topic from last time ...
Finish locationmap, clean up Jira,
prioritise issues for next release, Dispatcher docs.
-David
>
> The channel name is #for-j at irc.freenode.net
If anyone has trouble setting up an SVN client
or connecting to the channel, then just ask on
this dev mailing list.
There are some tips at:
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
It is slow at the moment so you are not missing anything.
A live log is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~diwaker/for-j.log
I'll post the stats after the day is over.
On Thursday 12 January 2006 9:14 pm, David Crossley wrote:
> 13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> See the calendar for your time zone.
> http://forrest.apache.org/for
13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
medium is still the dev mailing list.
The channel name is #for-j at irc.freenode.net
The topic is:
Finish loca
- Original Message -
From: "Thorsten Scherler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [FF] Forrest Friday Issues
| El jue, 12-01-2006 a las 07:29 +0800, Gav escribió:
| > Only a day or so to go.
| >
| > Has the s
El jue, 12-01-2006 a las 10:49 +0100, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió:
> Thorsten Scherler a écrit :
...
> >I will be there as well only partly since I have a basketball league
> >match that day.
> >
> >
> Hi,
>
> I think I will be there, if I succeed to configure my IRC client ;-) .
> Goo
Thorsten Scherler a écrit :
El jue, 12-01-2006 a las 11:24 +1100, David Crossley escribió:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use
El jue, 12-01-2006 a las 07:29 +0800, Gav escribió:
> Only a day or so to go.
>
> Has the subject matter been sorted ?
>
> Suggest working with Thorsten if this is possible on v3
Actually I have a nice task that people can do if there are looking for
work. ;-)
We need to finish the v3 rewri
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 4:24 pm, David Crossley wrote:
I'm really sorry about not participating for a while
now
Like all of us you do what you can and what you want to. It's supposed
to be fun, if you feel pressured the fun goes away - unless you mean you
are sorr
El jue, 12-01-2006 a las 11:24 +1100, David Crossley escribió:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > >
> > >13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> > >See the calendar for your time zone.
> > >http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
> > >
> > >We will use conventiona
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 4:24 pm, David Crossley wrote:
> The same semi-automation of the log as last time.
> If Diwaker or Cheche is around, then they might also
> have a logger bot (the up-to-date logfile is good).
I'm not sure how much time I will spend myself on IRC, but I'll definitely
l
Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >
> >13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> >See the calendar for your time zone.
> >http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
> >
> >We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
> >medium is still the dev mailing list.
> >
> >T
David Crossley wrote:
13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
medium is still the dev mailing list.
The channel name will be announced on the day.
T
Only a day or so to go.
Has the subject matter been sorted ?
Suggest working with Thorsten if this is possible on v3
More on XHTML 2.0
Jira Cleanup.
Other?
Who can make it this time?
I will be available some of the time (and hopefully wont have to disappear)
Gav...
--
No virus found in this
13 January starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
medium is still the dev mailing list.
The channel name will be announced on the day.
The topic is to finish lo
Forrest Friday was not well attended this time. Partly because of
peoples travel commitments with ApacheCon.
However, considerable headway was made into sorting out JIRA for the 0.8
release.
THe move to locationmaps within plugins is now complete. There are still
a couple of sub-tasks
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:20:14 2005
New Revision: 355527
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=355527&view=rev
Log:
Update
Modified:
forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051209-log.txt
David - have you written scripts for this? It s
Ross Gardler wrote:
> >Author: crossley
> >Date: Fri Dec 9 08:20:14 2005
> >New Revision: 355527
> >
> >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=355527&view=rev
> >Log:
> >Update
> >
> >Modified:
> >forrest/events/forrest-friday
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:20:14 2005
New Revision: 355527
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=355527&view=rev
Log:
Update
Modified:
forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051209-log.txt
David - have you written scripts for this? It seems you are
channel name is "for-dec".
>
> The topic is to finish locationmap, clean up Jira,
> prioritise issues for next release, more xhtml2 dev.
There has been some activity.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051209-log.txt
is updated every hour.
http://svn.
9 December starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
See the calendar for your time zone.
http://forrest.apache.org/forrest-friday.html
We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
medium is still the dev mailing list.
The channel name is "for-dec".
The topic is to finish locationmap, clean
Tim Williams wrote:
> I reckon the topic for this ForrestFriday should be discussed and set.
> I also wanted to see if I'm the only one impacted by travel with
> ApacheCon this weekend. I'll be traveling on Friday so won't be much
> help again. If there's enough people in this situation I thought
Unforunately I'm going to be offline for the next 3 weeks, so I won't be
around for this ForrestFriday. Hopefully cheche will bring JennuCuran back to
life. I'll catch up with the logs later.
Good luck guys, and have a good christmas everyone!
Diwaker
On Monday 05 December 2005 1:32 pm, Tim Wi
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> >As for topics, I suppose with Thorsten's recent email, it appears it
> >might be a good time to take another whack at XHTML2 in core.
>
> Personally, I don't feel that task is clearly defined enough yet.
> Furthermore, there have been way too many chan
Tim Williams wrote:
As for topics, I suppose with Thorsten's recent email, it appears it
might be a good time to take another whack at XHTML2 in core.
Personally, I don't feel that task is clearly defined enough yet.
Furthermore, there have been way too many changes in the structurer
recently
I reckon the topic for this ForrestFriday should be discussed and set.
I also wanted to see if I'm the only one impacted by travel with
ApacheCon this weekend. I'll be traveling on Friday so won't be much
help again. If there's enough people in this situation I thought maybe
we could look at an a
Thanks for the report and the work done by everyone. Sorry I couldn't
show up - family emergency and a freelance deadline have taken all my time.
- Addi
Ross Gardler wrote:
Forrest Friday was not as well attended as other Forrest Tuesdays.
However, this meant we could gets lots done
Ross Gardler wrote:
Forrest Friday was not as well attended as other Forrest Tuesdays.
However, this meant we could gets lots done since there was less chatter.
Things I noted of importance:
- lots of work on the locationmap stuff - core is now fully utilising
LM, and many of the plugins are
Forrest Friday was not as well attended as other Forrest Tuesdays.
However, this meant we could gets lots done since there was less chatter.
Things I noted of importance:
- lots of work on the locationmap stuff - core is now fully utilising
LM, and many of the plugins are doing so too (FOR
: "Tim Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 12:48 PM
Subject: [off topic] irc client for windows? [was: Re: Forrest Friday for
November (was Re: LaTeX output plugin)
|I usually participate by ssh'ing to my linux box and using xchat but
| I&
opic] irc client for windows? [was: Re: Forrest Friday for
November (was Re: LaTeX output plugin)
|I usually participate by ssh'ing to my linux box and using xchat but
| I'm on travel and don't have that capability. the windows version of
| xchat apparently costs money. so, ca
ic is to finish locationmap, clean up Jira,
> prioritise issues for next release, more xhtml2 dev.
> See below.
The log so far is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/events/forrest-friday/2005-log.txt
-David
Tim Williams wrote:
> I usually participate by ssh'ing to my linux box and using xchat but
> I'm on travel and don't have that capability. the windows version of
> xchat apparently costs money. so, can someone recommend a good free
> irc client for windows? I've got cygwin too but don't immediat
David Crossley wrote:
> 11 November starting at 06:00 Greenwich Mean Time.
> See the calendar for your time zone.
>
> We will use conventional IRC. The main communication
> medium is still the dev mailing list.
>
> The channel name is "for-n".
Cheche are you able to start JennyCurran.
If you ar
of working, is if an individual just does it. How long it
> > >| will be before one of us has that kind of time is anyones guess.
> > >|
> > >| Therefore, I (that is, me as an individual, this is not necessarily the
> > >| view of the community) would r
> >| current method of working, is if an individual just does it. How long it
> >| will be before one of us has that kind of time is anyones guess.
> >|
> >| Therefore, I (that is, me as an individual, this is not necessarily the
> >| view of the community) would rec
an individual just does it. How long it
| will be before one of us has that kind of time is anyones guess.
|
| Therefore, I (that is, me as an individual, this is not necessarily the
| view of the community) would recommend using XDoc for fear of waiting
| forever to make XHTML2 usable.
|
| Ross
l just does it. How long it
| will be before one of us has that kind of time is anyones guess.
|
| Therefore, I (that is, me as an individual, this is not necessarily the
| view of the community) would recommend using XDoc for fear of waiting
| forever to make XHTML2 usable.
|
| Ross
Well, maybe thi
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
