Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-06-02 Thread Ross Gardler
Andreas Hartmann wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... What do both projects think which one should become the main app (lenya or forrest)? that's a funny question :) afaik forrest has no workflow, user management etc, so if you need th

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-06-01 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Ross Gardler wrote: Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... What do both projects think which one should become the main app (lenya or forrest)? that's a funny question :) afaik forrest has no workflow, user management etc, so if you need those, the answer would be pre

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-25 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 17:40 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:07 +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > > [...] > > > Actually what do you think page2xhtml is? It is an internal format. > > Be careful here, page2xhtml.xsl belongs to the default pub

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-25 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:07 +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > Thorsten, > > don't get me wrong; I fully agree to the idea to have Forrest and Lenya > move towards a common target. This will make a lot of sense if it results > in all Apache projects beeing able to easily use Lenya to maintain their

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-22 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 11:09 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 21:59 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > > ... > >>i am not sure if i like all these config files and formats. looks a bit > >>like 'programming by config file' to me. > > > > > > That is

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-22 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:51 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:41 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > > > >>Thorsten Scherler wrote: > ... > > >>from what i understand, forrest has a superior concept of 'resource > >>types' (plugins in forrest lin

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-22 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 21:59 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: A view will be configured by a config file which basically contains the following tags (it is still evolving): The view tag's @type determines the final ou

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-22 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 21:59 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > A view will be configured by a config file which basically contains the > > following tags (it is still evolving): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-21 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:41 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... from what i understand, forrest has a superior concept of 'resource types' (plugins in forrest lingo), pluggable sitemap components to handle rendering of new sorts of content. I

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-21 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:41 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > my customer wants to have forrest in lenya (or vice versa). :) > > Lenya is officially supporting 2.1.6 (but 2.1.7 is working fine). > > Forrest is using 2.2-dev. > > 1.2.3 and trunk require 2.1.7 > >

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-20 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 19:09 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Sorry for the crosspost but it seems to be from interest for both lists. ;-) Hello devs, my customer wants to have forrest in lenya (or vice versa). :) The question that pops into to my head is

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-20 Thread Ross Gardler
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... What do both projects think which one should become the main app (lenya or forrest)? that's a funny question :) afaik forrest has no workflow, user management etc, so if you need those, the answer would be pretty clear. I think the question i

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-20 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 19:09 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > Sorry for the crosspost but it seems to be from interest for both > > lists. ;-) > > > > Hello devs, > > > > my customer wants to have forrest in lenya (or vice versa). :) > > > > The question that pops into to

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-20 Thread Gregor J. Rothfuss
Thorsten Scherler wrote: my customer wants to have forrest in lenya (or vice versa). :) Lenya is officially supporting 2.1.6 (but 2.1.7 is working fine). Forrest is using 2.2-dev. 1.2.3 and trunk require 2.1.7 i'd think cocoon 2.2 would work too after we take the new cocoon.xconf format (with incl

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-20 Thread Ross Gardler
Ross Gardler wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Sorry for the crosspost but it seems to be from interest for both lists. ;-) Hello devs, my customer wants to have forrest in lenya (or vice versa). :) The question that pops into to my head is the compatibility between the cocoon versions used by lenya/

Re: Lenya and forrest integration

2005-04-20 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: Sorry for the crosspost but it seems to be from interest for both lists. ;-) Hello devs, my customer wants to have forrest in lenya (or vice versa). :) The question that pops into to my head is the compatibility between the cocoon versions used by lenya/forrest. Lenya is of