Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 08:17 +1000, David Crossley wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > > > Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, > > > committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. > > > > http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread David Crossley
Thorsten Scherler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, > > committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. > > http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-124 Thanks but that is not the one that i meant. I think that it

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:23 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Sorry, my poor snipping confused the issue. > No worries. The result of the confusion can go to the docu then we know the different files. ;-) Cheers salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:57 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: ... Can we put them in subdirectories to indicate their purpose. They all have certain dirs where they go in a project: This suggestion is not really relevant given your comments above No that are no suggestions!!!

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:57 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: ... > > > > > >>Can we put them in subdirectories to indicate their purpose. > >> > > > > > > They all have certain dirs where they go in a project: > > This suggestion is not really relevant given your comments above > No that are no su

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:01 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:13 +1000, David Crossley wrote: Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. htt

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:01 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:13 +1000, David Crossley wrote: > > > >>Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, > >>committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. > >> > > >

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:13 +1000, David Crossley wrote: Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-124 Sorry, but I did not want to have 3 diff

Re: SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:13 +1000, David Crossley wrote: > Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, > committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. > http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-124 Sorry, but I did not want to have 3 different files calle

SVN properties (Was: svn commit: r159468)

2005-03-30 Thread David Crossley
Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly. Someone recently committed an SVN configuration file to an ASF repository - i thought that it was "committers" but i cannot now find it to add these new ones. Does an