Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

Den 28. aug. 2008 kl. 05.44 skrev David Crossley: We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. Please vote. +1 Sjur

[jira] Created: (FOR-1099) forrestbot "getsrc.svn" workstage assumes that "project.content-dir" contains all the content

forrestbot "getsrc.svn" workstage assumes that "project.content-dir" contains all the content - Key: FOR-1099 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1099

[jira] Commented: (FOR-1099) forrestbot "getsrc.svn" workstage assumes that "project.content-dir" contains all the content

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626478#action_12626478 ] David Crossley commented on FOR-1099: - I am not sure if the use of "recursive=false" for

[jira] Created: (FOR-1100) odt file from OOo output plugin incompatible with OOo *input* plugin

odt file from OOo output plugin incompatible with OOo *input* plugin Key: FOR-1100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1100 Project: Forrest Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (FOR-211) whole-site html and pdf: broken ext links

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626487#action_12626487 ] Andreas Lehmkühler commented on FOR-211: The main problem was an issue in "doc-to-doc-

[jira] Created: (FOR-1101) forrestbot uses the old JSVN project as a supporting product - perhaps replace it

forrestbot uses the old JSVN project as a supporting product - perhaps replace it - Key: FOR-1101 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1101 Project: Forrest

[jira] Commented: (FOR-1101) forrestbot uses the old JSVN project as a supporting product - perhaps replace it

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626491#action_12626491 ] David Crossley commented on FOR-1101: - A possible replacement might be "svnant" (http://

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:44 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. > > Please vote. I reckon I've missed discussion on why 2.1.x vs the released 2.2? It's not intuitive why we would "upgrade" to an ou

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

Tim Williams wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest > > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. > > > > Please vote. > > I reckon I've missed discussion on why 2.1.x vs the released 2.2? > It's not intuitive why we would "upgrade" to an outdated version. I

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:59 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest >> > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. >> > >> > Please vote. >> >> I reckon I've missed discussion on why 2.1.x vs the r

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 06:32 -0400, Tim Williams wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:59 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim Williams wrote: > >> David Crossley wrote: > >> > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest > >> > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. > >> > > >> > Ple

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

Tim Williams wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Tim Williams wrote: > >> David Crossley wrote: > >> > > >> > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest > >> > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. > >> > > >> > Please vote. > >> > >> I reckon I've missed discussion on why 2.1.x vs the released

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

David Crossley wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > [1] Apache Forrest project guidelines - Decision making > > http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#decision > > > > [2] [Proposal] use Cocoon-2.1 > > http://marc.info/?t=12194785982 > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-

Re: [VOTE] use Cocoon-2.1

I am away for the weekend, starting now. Will catch up later. -David