> Because I proposed an "intermediate" release with breaking changes.
> According to semver, that's a new major version.
The point is really that you should avoid breaking changes, if it doesn't
bring significant value for the users. Version changes that might make a
weird impression is just a sec
Sorry, I was wrong about freemarker-7. I thought I Double checked...
The build system really doesn't matter for the next major version. Sorry if
I made that impression.
I'll try to recreate some other ideas for the 2.x branch.
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023, 22:12 Benjamin Marwell, wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
Hi Daniel,
> FREEMARKER-7 was closed in 2017, with the comment about why (Gradle)
no, you closed it just as of today. IT was open and unlinked until
Hervé linked it.:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-7 -- click the "all" tab.
> Also, the version number... Seems to me that you r
We can add Jakarta support without any of these (as I noted in that closed
PR), I think. We will certainly see in December. If you can solve something
in isolation, that's generally a good thing.
Java modules compatibility. Is it not working currently? So every classes
are are inside the package "
