Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

2017-02-01 Thread Daniel Dekany
Wednesday, February 1, 2017, 9:36:41 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote: > On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and >> for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed >> anytime. Here's what we have: >> >> Logos:

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

2017-02-01 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote: > > I don't know what is needed but I transfert all rights of my logos to the > freemarker project. :) Julien has already filed a ICLA so we should be good with that. Jacopo

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

2017-02-01 Thread Julien NICOLAS
On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote: So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed anytime. Here's what we have: Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ - #1: "" with the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-30 Thread Christoph Rüger
+1 Looks good :) 2017-01-30 16:27 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany : > I have just went ahead and replaced the logo on > https://twitter.com/freemarker with #1.5. > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > > So this meant

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-28 Thread Daniel Dekany
Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: [snip] > I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more > similar #1.5, rather than #1. [snip] I ment "rather than #3"... -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany

[RESULT][VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-28 Thread Daniel Dekany
So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed anytime. Here's what we have: Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ - #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

2017-01-19 Thread Kirys
On 19/01/2017 13:30, Daniel Dekany wrote: A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all, changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling if you have maintained FM... <-; ). #1.5

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

2017-01-19 Thread David E Jones
I still like #3 on the top row... simple, and square is nice on certain sites (ie certain sites require a square logo). -David ![](https://link.nylas.com/open/5xm8m568zhx9qyloglsg31huz/local-30aff82b- 1fd7?r=ZGV2QGZyZWVtYXJrZXIuaW5jdWJhdG9yLmFwYWNoZS5vcmc=) On Jan 19 2017, at

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

2017-01-19 Thread Jacques Le Roux
OK, I focused, and I still prefer 2 with its (very hard to see) paler shadow Jacques Le 19/01/2017 à 18:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2. Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian Jacques Le 19/01/2017 à 13:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit : A new

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

2017-01-19 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2. Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian Jacques Le 19/01/2017 à 13:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit : A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all, changing a

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

2017-01-19 Thread Christoph Rüger
+1 for 1.5 Am 19.01.2017 6:19 nachm. schrieb "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany > wrote: > > > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a > > new one. But I guess we can be less

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

2017-01-19 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a > new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all, > changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling > if you

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread David E Jones
+1 for #3 as well. Modern designs are getting more flat and simplistic (which IMO is great). It seems to be related to people becoming more familiar with standard UI elements so there really is no need for 3D effects and other fancy things (including shadows, etc) that usually end up

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Barrie Selack
I like #3, clean, simple. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We will replace our square logo at Twitter > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo > in the future elsewhere too. > > Which one do you prefer from the *top* row

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Julien NICOLAS
Hello, I prefer #1. But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer #1.5 ;) Regards, Julien. On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote: We will replace our square logo at Twitter

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Piyush Mor
I like #3 On Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 20:50 Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > I like the first. > > Jacopo > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany > wrote: > > > We will replace our square logo at Twitter > > (https://twitter.com/freemarker),

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I like the first. Jacopo On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We will replace our square logo at Twitter > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo > in the future elsewhere too. > > Which one do you prefer from the *top*

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I vote for [1,2] though I'd prefer a bit less shadow If I'd like to follow the flat design trend I'd choose [1,3] but I'm not against skeuomorphism when done right Jacques Le 16/01/2017 à 12:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : We will replace our square logo at Twitter

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
e...@me.com>: > > > I vote for #2, although the 3d effect is overdone. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- Denis. > > Original Message > > From: Christoph Rüger > > Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27 > > To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Danie

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread bredelet
I vote for #2, although the 3d effect is overdone.  Cheers, -- Denis.   Original Message   From: Christoph Rüger Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27 To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Daniel Dekany Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Which logo? +1 for top row #3 I

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Daniel Dekany
I vote for the 1st. Monday, January 16, 2017, 12:11:18 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We will replace our square logo at Twitter > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo > in the future elsewhere too. > > Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)? >

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

2017-01-16 Thread Christoph Rüger
+1 for top row #3 I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon look-and-feel. 2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany : > We will replace our square logo at Twitter > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo > in the