Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > For OFBiz I don't understand why > > # No Software Grant and No IP Clearance Filed > > I guess David, Andrew and the ASF cleared this aspect when we graduated > The OFBiz graduation was about

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

t's going > on. I don't recall your issue been discussed, but I may missed it. > > On Jan 30, 2018 06:39, "Daniel Dekany" <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Monday, January 29, 2018, 7:16:21 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 201

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Monday, January 29, 2018, 4:35:38 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > Great, Daniel! > > > > Let's move to the next step and open the vote at general@incubator.a.o > ;-) > > David has started discussing the issue with his

Re: Status file date issues

My apologies, I'm way overloaded right now and will be for at least the next couple of days. If this can't wait a few more days I'd say just remove me from the mentor list, but I'll get to it by mid-week. -David On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache FreeMarker Project: > > * Dániel Dékány <ddek...@apache.org> > * David E. Jones

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

ithin the scope of > responsibility of the Apache FreeMarker Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache FreeMarker Project: > > * Dániel Dékány &l

Re: Please check and sign off our Podling Report for January!

he draft of our report on > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2018, and tell if you agree > and what would you change! > > Then, when the deadline (Wed, January 03) is close, please also sign > it off, if you agree. > > A problem I have noticed that from the original template

Re: FreeMarker 3 wiki page - please review it

That's fantastic Daniel, it's great to see the whole summary in one place. One thought is that it might be helpful to split the items under 'API and architecture' and 'Template language' into those intended for a first release and those that are 'nice to haves' that may come later. My

Re: Please reivew (then sign) our April poddlin report

Thank you Daniel, the report looks good. Signed. -David  On Apr 3 2017, at 3:05 am, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Here it is:

Re: Request For Comment - freemarker-cli

 On Mar 6 2017, at 7:24 am, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Anyway, anybody has thoughts about this? This sort of contribution seems to come

Re: [FM3] Remove BeansWrapper and some of its settings

These all sound like good changes, and clarify what is really going on. Removing object wrapping IMO is more important than removing the *Template*Model* interfaces. These interfaces don't have the same runtime and GC overhead as object wrapping and they can be nice for type checking to

Re: Pluggable template retrival/caching logic (Was: Template Loader Implementation that loads from a database (DataSource))

On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 15:56 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Thursday, February 16, 2017, 6:17:00 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > > > > This is cleaner, more obvious what's going on underneath, but since > > the DefaultTemplateResolver will be the most commonly used

Re: Pluggable template retrival/caching logic (Was: Template Loader Implementation that loads from a database (DataSource))

This is cleaner, more obvious what's going on underneath, but since the DefaultTemplateResolver will be the most commonly used you could just leave the current setting methods as they are and just document that if you set a different TemplateResolver they will be ignored. -David On Wed,

Remove Version and incompatible improvements? (was [FM3] Configuration API simplification)

On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 21:32 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: > I propose that in FM3 Configuration should only have two constructors: > >   Configuration(Version incompatibleImprovements) >   Configuration(Properties properties) > > and that it should not have a setIncompatibleImprovements(Version) >

Re: New committer: Woonsan Ko

On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 19:42 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache FreeMarker > (incubating) has invited Woonsan Ko to become a committer and we are > pleased to announce that he has accepted. > > Woonsan Ko has been an active FreeMarker user for years

Re: Template Loader Implementation that loads from a database (DataSource)

On Jan 24 2017, at 10:25 am, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > Tuesday, January 24, 2017, 6:48:16 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > > but all other Configuration.getTemplate() methods call this method > > > so it is an easy way to override all Tem

Re: Template Loader Implementation that loads from a database (DataSource)

A simpler TemplateLoader would be helpful. One approach I've used to simplify it is to override all loading by creating an object that extends the freemarker.template.Configuration and override this method: Template getTemplate(final String name, Locale locale, Object

Re: [FM3] Dropping support before Servlet 2.5 / JSP 2.1. Or even before 3.0/2.2?

On Jan 20 2017, at 7:26 am, Daniel Dekany wrote: > We might even want to require Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2, from Java EE 6 > > (December 10, 2009), just to make things easier in the future, though at the moment we don't utilize that. This seems very reasonable. It

Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)

I still like #3 on the top row... simple, and square is nice on certain sites (ie certain sites require a square logo). -David  On Jan 19 2017, at

Re: [VOTE] Which logo?

+1 for #3 as well. Modern designs are getting more flat and simplistic (which IMO is great). It seems to be related to people becoming more familiar with standard UI elements so there really is no need for 3D effects and other fancy things (including shadows, etc) that usually end up

Re: [FM3] Further legacy things to drop...

These look good to me. Always feels good to clean out old and unneeded code. :) -David On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:58 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: > I have collected some further easy changes for FM3... Any comments? > > - Drop FTL classic compatible mode option (Roughly emulates FM1 >   behavior

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

; version is recommended for release by the PPMC, and the formal release > vote will be soon follow on gene...@incubator.apache.org. > > Thanks for checking and testing this release guys! > > Binding (IPMC member) votes: > David E Jones +1 > Jacopo Cappellato +1 > Jo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

> On 22 Mar 2016, at 13:06, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > > Tuesday, March 22, 2016, 8:01:51 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Others have reviewed the various release artifacts (and my >> experience with ASF releases is n

Re: How to detect macro duplicates ?

It is useful to allow macro overrides, ie replace the macro and don’t throw an exception. As a specific use case: in Moqui for screen/form rendering (translating XML screen/form/etc definitions to HTML, data XML, CSV, XSL-FO, etc) there are macro libraries with around 65 macros for each

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 2

+1 Tested with Moqui Framework and various projects based on it (generating HTML, XSL-FO, Groovy code, etc) and it is running well. This includes automated tests that render around 500 screens using some fairly complex templates and macros, and do a lot of XML processing/transformation. These

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

+1 for this attempt too, notes in the previous VOTE thread -David > On 13 Jan 2016, at 16:11, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > I did an update. No functionality/stability changes, only legal ones > and some build script change: > > - NOTICE file changes: > - Added missing

Re: Signing the Januray report (and mailing list subscriptions)

Thank you Sergio and Daniel. Yes, this is a new account since we used cwiki.a.o for OFBiz. Request sent… -David > On 4 Jan 2016, at 08:45, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi David, > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:30 PM, David E Jones <d...@dejc.com>

Re: Signing the Januray report (and mailing list subscriptions)

I read over the updated January report and it looks good. The page shows up as immutable for me on wiki.apache.org, so not sure how to sign it. -David > On 3 Jan 2016, at 04:51, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Dear FreeMarker Mentors! > > Please review and sign off the