: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code
as th
rdt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as
the REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON docume
29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as
the REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same
e.g.
releases) easier, not unlike the Kafka connector, or even Spring Data for that
matter.
$0.02
-j
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental P
t;$0.02
>-j
>
>________
>From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
>To: dev@geode.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
&g
day, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the
REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better at i
sday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else
but still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a b
rdt
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else
but still fail to see the value in keeping
afka connector, or even Spring Data for that
matter.
$0.02
-j
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the REST
server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better at it.
On 3/29/21, 10:33 AM, "John Blum"
uesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDriver team, I too have
an attachment to Protobuf. It’s purely technical, however, not e
021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but
still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless
someone is going to pick
@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but
still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless
someone is going to pick it up soon and complete
d and would thus require a Geode 2.0.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 14:54
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
-1
Given
-Dan
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDriver team, I too have an
attachment t
was to convert PDX objects to JSON. That was about as
efficient as the existing REST protocol, which also uses json.
-Dan
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
ctive or neither experimental nor
deprecated and would thus require a Geode 2.0.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 14:54
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out
of Geode.
I
of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of
Geode.
I understand that the way that was used to hook into Geode
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of
Geode.
I understand that the way that was used to hook into Geode was less the
perfect, and I fully
ed client protocol to communicate with
> locators and servers.
> github.com
>
>
> From: Alexander Murmann
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf c
ervers.
github.com
From: Alexander Murmann
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
+1 for removal
USS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal.
On 3/23
+1 for removal
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal.
On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote:
I'
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
Hi folks,
We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that no-one to
my knowledge is using. We’re testing it with e
+1
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Darrel Schneider
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:46:24 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I'm in favor of its removal. I was w
of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
Hi folks,
We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that no-one to my
knowledge is using. We’re testing it with every build and are having to make
changes to it to keep it up to date with the rest of the project. The last
Hi folks,
We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that no-one to my
knowledge is using. We’re testing it with every build and are having to make
changes to it to keep it up to date with the rest of the project. The last
change of substance to the geode-protobuf
30 matches
Mail list logo
