Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

move the > > primary bucket. > > > > Thanks. > > Hitesh > > -- > > *From:* Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> > > *To:* dev@geode.apache.org; Hitesh Khamesra <hitesh...@yahoo.com> > > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 20

Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

tion we don't move the > primary bucket. > > Thanks. > Hitesh > -- > *From:* Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> > *To:* dev@geode.apache.org; Hitesh Khamesra <hitesh...@yahoo.com> > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 1:55 PM > *Subj

Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

2017 1:55 PM Subject: Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read) Here is the link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2714 Hi Hitesh, Before executing a function, we build a list of buckets that the function needs to execute on and then we build the function c

Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

Here is the link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2714 Hi Hitesh, Before executing a function, we build a list of buckets that the function needs to execute on and then we build the function context using only those buckets. So, as long as the function is using the context to get the

Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

Can you give a link to the proposal? Thanks, Jared > On Mar 24, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Hitesh Khamesra > wrote: > > Please let us know your opinion on that. > Thanks.Hitesh

GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

Please let us know your opinion on that. Thanks.Hitesh