: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code
as th
rdt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as
the REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON docume
29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as
the REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same
e.g.
releases) easier, not unlike the Kafka connector, or even Spring Data for that
matter.
$0.02
-j
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental P
t;$0.02
>-j
>
>________________
>From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
>To: dev@geode.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
&g
day, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the
REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better at i
sday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else
but still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a b
rdt
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else
but still fail to see the value in keeping
afka connector, or even Spring Data for that
matter.
$0.02
-j
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the REST
server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better at it.
On 3/29/21, 10:33 AM, "John Blum"
uesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDriver team, I too have
an attachment to Protobuf. It’s purely technical, however, not e
021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but
still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless
someone is going to pick
@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but
still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless
someone is going to pick it up soon and complete
d and would thus require a Geode 2.0.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 14:54
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
-1
Given
-Dan
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDriver team, I too have an
attachment t
was to convert PDX objects to JSON. That was about as
efficient as the existing REST protocol, which also uses json.
-Dan
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
ctive or neither experimental nor
deprecated and would thus require a Geode 2.0.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 14:54
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out
of Geode.
I
of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of
Geode.
I understand that the way that was used to hook into Geode
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of
Geode.
I understand that the way that was used to hook into Geode was less the
perfect, and I fully
ed client protocol to communicate with
> locators and servers.
> github.com
>
>
> From: Alexander Murmann
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf c
ervers.
github.com
From: Alexander Murmann
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
+1 for removal
USS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal.
On 3/23
+1 for removal
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal.
On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote:
I'
+1 for removal.
On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote:
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread
monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated.
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent:
+1
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Darrel Schneider
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:46:24 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I'm in favor of its removal. I was w
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread
monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated.
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] removal
29 matches
Mail list logo
