Looking more into this, it looks like this was introduced by the changes
for GEODE-7458 - "Adding additional option in gfsh command "start gateway
sender" to control clearing of existing queues".
That happened about a month ago, but it's inherent to those flaky tests
that we discover them only
In the old management team, we have been considering the idea of getting rid of
jmx connection in gfsh and only using http connection mechanism.
On Jun 19, 2020 2:53 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote:
So I can see why this research paper was so bleak about the options in trying
to get the SSL
So I can see why this research paper was so bleak about the options in trying
to get the SSL certificate for the current connection being serviced. As they
discovered the accept loop in OpenJDK’s (and older Oracle implementations)
immediately fires the RMI operation to a thread pool after
On Jun 19, 2020, at 12:20 PM, Anthony Baker
mailto:bak...@vmware.com>> wrote:
That’s fine, I just want to understand what happens when I use this API:
createdAuthenticatedView(…)
Does it throw an exception? Silently work but not switch to the new user?
I would expect that first off we
Thank you all for the votes needed for the backport. It has been backported to
support/1.13 branch
GEODE-8261: Added a null check for the proxyID. (#5251)
Regards
Naba
-Original Message-
From: Jianxia Chen
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 12:22 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re:
+1
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:16 PM Nabarun Nag wrote:
> Hi Geode devs,
>
> Requesting vote to backport of GEODE-8261 to 1.13
>
> Why?
> This commit fixes an issue with servers throwing null pointer exceptions
> while a member is being shutdown and registering interest is in process.
>
> SHA
>
+1
On 6/19/20, 12:16 PM, "Nabarun Nag" wrote:
Hi Geode devs,
Requesting vote to backport of GEODE-8261 to 1.13
Why?
This commit fixes an issue with servers throwing null pointer exceptions
while a member is being shutdown and registering interest is in process.
SHA
That’s fine, I just want to understand what happens when I use this API:
createdAuthenticatedView(…)
Does it throw an exception? Silently work but not switch to the new user?
Thanks,
Anthony
On Jun 19, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Jacob Barrett
mailto:jabarr...@vmware.com>> wrote:
1) Multi-user
+1
From: Nabarun Nag
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 12:15 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Backporting of GEODE-8261 to 1.13 release branch.
Hi Geode devs,
Requesting vote to backport of GEODE-8261 to 1.13
Why?
This commit fixes an issue with servers
Hi Geode devs,
Requesting vote to backport of GEODE-8261 to 1.13
Why?
This commit fixes an issue with servers throwing null pointer exceptions while
a member is being shutdown and registering interest is in process.
SHA
720a4caea2ddb22296aa3225fc5264d2096cdf20
Regards
Nabarun
The only use of RMI in Geode that I'm aware of is:
1) GFSH to Locator communication over jmx/rmi
2) Communication from the main JUnit JVM to DUnit JVM for dunit tests
In theory, a User could connect to the Locator over jmx/rmi from any JVM
using JDK JMX code. This could include deploying a
All,
Related to the conversation about certificate based authentication, how much of
the client side would invoke any RMI requests? I am trying to gauge the impact
of not having RMI as an option for client applications wishing to use
certificate based authentication.
-Jake
>
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Jakov Varenina
> mailto:jakov.varen...@est.tech>> wrote:
>
> In order to completely remove the need for username/password, it is required
> that we implement this new kind of authorization on *all* geode
> interfaces/components (cluster, gateway, web, jmx,
On Jun 18, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Jakov Varenina
mailto:jakov.varen...@est.tech>> wrote:
Hi Anthony and all,
I have been working with Mario on this feature. Let me first answer the
questions:
1) Multi-user authentication will not be supported when using this new kind of
SecurityManager
OK to backport, Jinmei. Thanks for your contribution.
-Dave
(I saw a +1 vote from Owen in another email client, though it doesn’t seem to
show up in this rendering of the thread. Thought I had successfully worked
around the email issue. Hmmm…)
> On Jun 19, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Jianxia Chen
I think it's useful for contact those that feel compelled to hide their email
addresses. If there is an email address you can surely use that directly. I
have used the commenting feature a few times and like it because it puts the
comment with the code making it dead clear what I am talking
Since most folks don't even notice they've been requested to review a PR, I
don't have high confidence that they'll notice a notification about a
comment on a past commit. Seems sort of useful though. Thank you!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:53 PM Owen Nichols wrote:
> Perhaps a little-known
+1
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jinmei Liao wrote:
> Need one more vote
>
> From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 3:43 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] back port fix for GEODE-8251 to support branches
>
> +1
>
> On
Need one more vote
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 3:43 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] back port fix for GEODE-8251 to support branches
+1
On 6/18/20, 3:24 PM, "Jinmei Liao" wrote:
The fix for this issue
Thank you so much for sharing this, Mark!
It looks like there is a big cluster around WAN Gateway. Is anyone already
looking into the WAN issues?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM Mark Hanson wrote:
> FYI, the build success rate was around 90% or so about two months ago.
>
> Here are the DUnit
20 matches
Mail list logo
