Re: Draft of August 2020 Geode report to the board

2020-08-07 Thread Karen Miller
Thanks, Anthony. Here is Draft 2 of the August board report. Corrections and comments by Monday at noon please. ## Description: The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and maintenance of software related to a data management platform that provides real-time, consistent access to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Postpone Geode 1.14

2020-08-07 Thread Owen Nichols
Hi Michael, lack of replies may be simply due to not having shipped 1.13 yet. Once it's in the rearview mirror, folks may be more in the frame of mind to look back at it, perhaps as part of the already-proposed discussion ("Once we have shipped 1.13, we should discuss when we want to cut the

Re: [PROPOSAL] one-time cleanup of stray and obsolete tags in geode repo

2020-08-07 Thread Owen Nichols
Voting results: +1: 7 0: 0 -1: 0 It's past the announced deadline and the voting is successful. All proposed tags have now been deleted (except sga2-core). Your existing checkouts will continue to show these tags, even after a pull, unless you A) resync from github or B) delete them

Re: Draft of August 2020 Geode report to the board

2020-08-07 Thread Anthony Baker
Nice! I would also call out a significant increase in (awesome) community blog posts: https://medium.com/p/threads-used-in-apache-geode-function-execution-9dd707cf227c?source=email-9fb0d2d72e25--writer.postDistributed=bfb9703d4399c681a447389c689094af

Re: [PROPOSAL] Postpone Geode 1.14

2020-08-07 Thread Michael Oleske
I'm going to take the lack of replies as there are no plans for a retrospective on this. If there is interest in doing this in the future, I'd be happy to facilitate the discussion. -michael From: Mark Hanson Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 09:59 To:

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

2020-08-07 Thread Dave Barnes
Plenty of approvals. Go ahead and port, Anil. Thanks! On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:08 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > +1 and please bring to support/1.12 as well > > On 8/7/20, 10:49 AM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:35 AM Anilkumar Gingade > > wrote: > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

2020-08-07 Thread Owen Nichols
+1 and please bring to support/1.12 as well On 8/7/20, 10:49 AM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: +1 On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:35 AM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > This causes a large object to be partially (corrupt data) stored in cache > instead of throwing an exception. > >

Draft of August 2020 Geode report to the board

2020-08-07 Thread Karen Miller
Here's a first draft of a board report. I'd like to include some of the project's many blog posts (any new videos? did anyone give a Geode talk at a workshop or conference?) in our Community Health section. Please send me a link and hopefully an approximate date when the blog was posted. Please

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

2020-08-07 Thread Jianxia Chen
+1 On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:35 AM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > This causes a large object to be partially (corrupt data) stored in cache > instead of throwing an exception. > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

2020-08-07 Thread Nabarun Nag
Super +1 From: Anilkumar Gingade Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 10:34 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13 This causes a large object to be partially (corrupt data) stored in cache instead of throwing an exception.

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

2020-08-07 Thread Donal Evans
+1 From: Anilkumar Gingade Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 10:34 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13 This causes a large object to be partially (corrupt data) stored in cache instead of throwing an exception.

[PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

2020-08-07 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
This causes a large object to be partially (corrupt data) stored in cache instead of throwing an exception.