Re: [PROPOSAL] re-cut support/1.15

2022-05-06 Thread Owen Nichols
Sounds great, Robert. Once your fix is on develop, no further approval is needed to backport. Use your best judgement (or feel free to discuss on the dev list if you are unsure). If backporting will take some while, add the blocks-1.15.0 label to be sure this doesn’t slip through the cracks.

Re: [PROPOSAL] annul support/1.15

2022-05-06 Thread Robert Houghton
I would like GEODE-1028 [1] to be considered for support/1.15. It is a significant change to the build logic, and I think would be a benefit to inclusion in the release branch. PR to develop is available[2] Thank you, -Robert Houghton [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10283 [2

Re: [PROPOSAL] re-cut support/1.15

2022-05-06 Thread Owen Nichols
Great news! I would be delighted to continue as Release Manager for 1.15.0. To track progress toward code-complete, I will monitor the "needsTriage" and "blocks-1.15.0" labels (for Affects Version = 1.15.0). Currently I see 1 needsTriage [1] and 2 blocks-1.15.0 [2]. [1]

Re: [PROPOSAL] annul support/1.15

2022-05-06 Thread Anthony Baker
Owen, with all the recent work I think we are in an excellent position to resume work on the 1.15 release. While there are a few thing still outstanding, let’s go ahead and recut the release branch as of Monday, 2022-05-09. Would you be willing to resume release manager duties? @Everyone -

Re: [PROPOSAL] RFC for migrating from springfox to springdoc

2022-05-06 Thread John Blum
Spring Data for Apache Geode (and the upcoming Spring Data for VMware Tanzu GemFire) very much depends on and uses the Management REST API. From: Jinmei Liao Date: Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 5:40 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] RFC for migrating from springfox to springdoc