Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2022-01-05 Thread Owen Nichols
ingade Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 07:09 To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing +1 Thanks for bringing this and taking care of this. -Anil. On 1/3/22, 10:41 AM, "Dan Smith" wrote: Looking at Known

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2022-01-04 Thread Alexander Murmann
he.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing +1 Thanks for bringing this and taking care of this. -Anil. On 1/3/22, 10:41 AM, "Dan Smith" wrote: Looking at KnownVersion.java - we did make protocol changes in 1.12.1 and 1.13.2. So, my suggestion would b

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2022-01-04 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
hat aren't the latest. -Dan From: Dan Smith Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 10:37 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing +1 - this seems reasonable to me. If we do make a proto

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2022-01-03 Thread Dan Smith
To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing +1 - this seems reasonable to me. If we do make a protocol change in a patch, we could potentially keep around an older patch version just in that specific case, but otherwise I think this makes sense. -Dan

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2022-01-03 Thread Dan Smith
8:53 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing Interesting data point: 40% of maven central downloads last month were for version 1.4.0. Of course those numbers can be easily skewed by CI bots, but still! @Owen, I think your suggestion nicely

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2021-12-23 Thread Anthony Baker
Interesting data point: 40% of maven central downloads last month were for version 1.4.0. Of course those numbers can be easily skewed by CI bots, but still! @Owen, I think your suggestion nicely improves practicality while continuing to support strong compatibility. In many cases it’s quite

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2021-12-22 Thread Jacob Barrett
Yes! This! 100%! > On Dec 22, 2021, at 7:14 PM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > Since adopting our N-2 support policy, the list of released versions in > /settings.gradle has ballooned to over 30 entries [1]. > > CI tests use this list to confirm that we don’t break rolling upgrade ability > or

[DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

2021-12-22 Thread Owen Nichols
Since adopting our N-2 support policy, the list of released versions in /settings.gradle has ballooned to over 30 entries [1]. CI tests use this list to confirm that we don’t break rolling upgrade ability or compatibility with older clients, but some of these tests don’t seem to scale well: