for the working
model that we purport to follow.
From: Owen Nichols
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 1:45 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fate of master branch
@Robert, would you care to elaborate on the case for keeping a branch (by any
name) that this discussion
t;> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the
wiki page about
>>>> branching that Alberto pointed out.
>>>>
s
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki
page about
>>>> branching that Alberto pointed out.
>>>> ____
ing master branch. An also for updating the wiki
page about
>>>> branching that Alberto pointed out.
>>>> ____
>>>> De: Bruce Schuchardt
>>>> Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 20
Reyes
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page
about
>>>> branching that Alberto pointed out.
>>>>
>>>> De
gt; +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page about
>>>> branching that Alberto pointed out.
>>>>
>>>> De: Bruce Schuchardt
>>>> Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:
Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page about
>>>> branching that Alberto pointed out.
>>>>
>>>> De: B
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> For geode-examples, there is more impact since master is the default branch
> and anyone who has accessed these examples would be affected. I think it’s
> still worth it to make the switch.
I wonder if it makes sense put current
gt;
>>> De: Bruce Schuchardt
>>> Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37
>>> Para: dev@geode.apache.org
>>> Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch
>>>
>>> Let's just delete it. I need to do that in my own repo
Let’s check all the repos:
geode
master is the latest released code
work is done on develop (default branch)
geode-benchmarks
master is the latest released code
work is done on develop (default branch)
geode-dotnet-core-client
master is the latest
>> Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37
>> Para: dev@geode.apache.org
>> Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch
>>
>> Let's just delete it. I need to do that in my own repos as well.
>>
>> On 6/26/20, 8:05 AM, "Blake Bender" wrote:
>>
ed out.
>
> De: Bruce Schuchardt
> Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37
> Para: dev@geode.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch
>
> Let's just delete it. I need to do that in my own repos as well.
>
> On 6/26/20, 8:05 AM, "B
+1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page about
branching that Alberto pointed out.
De: Bruce Schuchardt
Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37
Para: dev@geode.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch
Let's just delete it. I
Let's just delete it. I need to do that in my own repos as well.
On 6/26/20, 8:05 AM, "Blake Bender" wrote:
Apologies if this has been addressed already and I missed it. In keeping
with other OSS projects, I believe it’s time we did something about removing
the insensitive term master
.
Alberto G.
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 5:26 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fate of master branch
I am 100% in favor or dropping the master branch completely. I felt like it was
always a source of confusion. Was it the most recent
I am 100% in favor or dropping the master branch completely. I felt like it was
always a source of confusion. Was it the most recent release or the latest
version number. I know we have had issues with even correctly merging the
latest version back into it sometimes.
I really can’t see any
Apologies if this has been addressed already and I missed it. In keeping with
other OSS projects, I believe it’s time we did something about removing the
insensitive term master from Geode repositories.
One choice a lot of projects appear to be going with is a simple rename from
master •
17 matches
Mail list logo
