Re: Experimental features for 1.0

That did it. > On Aug 12, 2016, at 3:10 PM, William Markito wrote: > > I've just updated it, can you please try again ? > > Thanks > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:30 AM, John Blum wrote: > >> Hi William- >> >> Says your filter does not exist or is private, even when logged in. >> >> Thanks,

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

Yep, were good... Thanks William! On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:10 PM, William Markito wrote: > I've just updated it, can you please try again ? > > Thanks > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:30 AM, John Blum wrote: > > > Hi William- > > > > Says your filter does not exist or is private, even when logg

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

I've just updated it, can you please try again ? Thanks On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:30 AM, John Blum wrote: > Hi William- > > Says your filter does not exist or is private, even when logged in. > > Thanks, > -John > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:22 AM, William Markito > wrote: > > > Here is th

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

Hi William- Says your filter does not exist or is private, even when logged in. Thanks, -John On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:22 AM, William Markito wrote: > Here is the initial list of JIRA's... > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12338213 > > This might be a good query to bookmark

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

Here is the initial list of JIRA's... https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12338213 This might be a good query to bookmark and keep track of experimental features. I've also added the UDP SSL support (GEODE-1372 ) to the list. Thanks!

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

Cool! I'll take a stab looking current stuff in develop and already opened tickets. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > I think that is the relevant point. We are making releases from develop, > not from WIP branches. > > @John, HDFS was moved to a WIP branch. > > Anthony >

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

I think that is the relevant point. We are making releases from develop, not from WIP branches. @John, HDFS was moved to a WIP branch. Anthony > On Aug 11, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > JVSD is not on develop, so maybe not. We probably only need to annotate and > file tickets for in

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

JVSD is not on develop, so maybe not. We probably only need to annotate and file tickets for incomplete features on develop. -Kirk On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Dave Barnes wrote: > JVSD is not fully-featured, yet. Does it belong on the list? > > > On Aug 10, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Kirk Lund w

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

JVSD is not fully-featured, yet. Does it belong on the list? > On Aug 10, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > +1 for Jira tickets with "experimental" label > > Also, don't forget we have the @Experimental annotation defined in > geode-common that should be applied to any experimental user AP

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

+1 for Jira tickets with "experimental" label Also, don't forget we have the @Experimental annotation defined in geode-common that should be applied to any experimental user APIs before final 1.0.0 release. -Kirk On Wednesday, August 10, 2016, William Markito wrote: > As we move forward to 1.0

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

+1 What about HDFS storage support, or was this dropped completely? On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > +1 - Great idea > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:10 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > > > Yes we should definitely do this > > > > -- > > Mike Stolz > > Principal Engineer - Gemfi

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

+1 - Great idea On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:10 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > Yes we should definitely do this > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager > Mobile: 631-835-4771 > On Aug 10, 2016 9:01 PM, "William Markito" wrote: > > > As we move forward to 1.0 I'd like to propo

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

Yes we should definitely do this -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Aug 10, 2016 9:01 PM, "William Markito" wrote: > As we move forward to 1.0 I'd like to propose creating JIRAS with the > "experimental" label to capture everything we have that is

Experimental features for 1.0

As we move forward to 1.0 I'd like to propose creating JIRAS with the "experimental" label to capture everything we have that is classified as such. This would help users and projects consume Geode to consider those features properly and decide to add support (or not) to them as well. AFAIK t