Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-07 Thread Jason Huynh
I've created a ticket (feel free to modify/reword/rename it). It's GEODE-1972: Move Geode Hibernate module to a feature branch On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:17 AM Dave Barnes wrote: So, what form should the JIRA ticket assume? (a) Move HIbernate from develop to a feature

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Dave Barnes
So, what form should the JIRA ticket assume? (a) Move HIbernate from develop to a feature branch, or (b) Merge Hibernate code to develop (as a future task, cf GEODE-1416 for how the NC was handled) After somebody (which I can do, if you like) creates a ticket for the code, I'll create a subtask

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Joey McAllister
+1 for moving to a feature branch. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:32 AM Mark Bretl wrote: > +1 for feature branch as well. > > --Mark > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > +1 for moving it to a feature branch. > > > > -Dan > > > > On Wed,

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Mark Bretl
+1 for feature branch as well. --Mark On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for moving it to a feature branch. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > Bumping to see if we have come to a decision on whether we

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-06 Thread Dan Smith
+1 for moving it to a feature branch. -Dan On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > Bumping to see if we have come to a decision on whether we want to move > this to a feature branch and get rid of it for 1.0 or post 1.0, especially > now that the 1.0 release

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-10-05 Thread Jason Huynh
Bumping to see if we have come to a decision on whether we want to move this to a feature branch and get rid of it for 1.0 or post 1.0, especially now that the 1.0 release branch has been cut On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:22 PM Anthony Baker wrote: Likewise! Geode provides an L2

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-23 Thread Anthony Baker
Likewise! Geode provides an L2 cache for Hibernate. That is, an application that is using Hibernate could plug in Geode for caching. Specifically, we implement Hibernate’s cache interfaces like CacheProvider, RegionFactory, etc. There are build-time dependencies on several hibernate jars

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-23 Thread Dan Smith
Geode provides an optional L2 cache for hibernate: http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/docs/tools_modules/hibernate_cache/setting_up_the_module.html Looking at the code, it looks like the geode-modules-hibernate is pulling in hibernate-core as a compile dependency, but it's not being distributed as

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-22 Thread Dave Barnes
Note: Doc situation is similar to that of JVSD, except there are more docs for Hibernate. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William Markito wrote: > If moving to a feature branch is a better approach, I'm fine as well.. > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-22 Thread William Markito
If moving to a feature branch is a better approach, I'm fine as well.. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > Correct. Put it on a feature branch awaiting contributions. > > > > On 23/09/2016 8:41 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > >> By remove, do you mean “put

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-22 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Correct. Put it on a feature branch awaiting contributions. On 23/09/2016 8:41 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: By remove, do you mean “put it on a feature branch awaiting contributions?” hibernate-3.5.5 was released in 2010 and has undergone significant changes since then. Seems reasonable to put

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-22 Thread Anthony Baker
By remove, do you mean “put it on a feature branch awaiting contributions?” hibernate-3.5.5 was released in 2010 and has undergone significant changes since then. Seems reasonable to put this feature on hold until can be brought current. Anthony > On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-22 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 to removing until updated to newer version Do we know if anyone in the big-bad world is using it? --Udo On 23/09/2016 8:15 AM, William Markito wrote: Folks, We're still building the Hibernate cache module [1] but it's compatible only with a very old version (3.5) and given that the API

Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

2016-09-22 Thread William Markito
Folks, We're still building the Hibernate cache module [1] but it's compatible only with a very old version (3.5) and given that the API has completely changed and unless someone in the community wants to help getting this module up-to-date with at least Hibernate 5.x I'd like propose to remove