Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread David Blevins
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: The upside is that it takes 10 seconds to fully generate, so adding content is a breeze. That right there is enough for me. A definite step in the right direction. -David

Re: Updated Wiki with Eclipse Deployment Information

2005-06-07 Thread Rick McGuire
I downloaded the most recent stable eclipse build, and the Configure Build Path menu option is now available. However, after I remove the hard coded path, the only check box items under target in the Add Folder dialog are class and test-classes. There's no xmlbeans entry to check. Are there

Re: Updated Wiki with Eclipse Deployment Information

2005-06-07 Thread David Jencks
The xmlbeans code is generated during the build (into target/xmlbeans), and not every -builder module has any... so make sure you have built geronimo before trying this, and pick a module (such as connector) that does have generated xmlbeans code. hope this helps david jencks On Jun 7, 2005,

Re: Updated Wiki with Eclipse Deployment Information

2005-06-07 Thread Rick McGuire
Well, it certainly added to the confusion! I believe I have successfully built geronimo first. I've been stepping through everything on the EclipseDeployment page one step at a time. Everything has seemed to work ok so far, except for the maven -o m:eclipse step, which gave me an error

Re: Updated Wiki with Eclipse Deployment Information

2005-06-07 Thread David Jencks
easy to get confused... 1. can you check that e.g. modules/connector-builder/target/xmlbeans is present and has source files in it. 2. Having built g. once, you should be able to run maven -o m:eclipse with no problems -- you already have all the dependencies downloaded. I wonder if you

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Ok - I pushed it out. When the servers synch, it will be there. We need a more complete list of dependencies - and the intention isn't our dep list, but rather the collaboration list. We have a dep on clogging, for example, but I wouldn't consider that a collaboration. Also, I'll

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread David Blevins
I didn't mean to be the deciding vote, I'd still like to know what others think. We haven't heard from very many people on this thread. Hey everyone out there who has ever had an opinion on the website, what do you think? Again, I'm talking to everyone, not just people privileged with commit

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jun 7, 2005, at 2:37 PM, David Blevins wrote: I didn't mean to be the deciding vote, You weren't I'd still like to know what others think. We haven't heard from very many people on this thread. Hey everyone out there who has ever had an opinion on the website, what do you think?

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 6/7/05, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't mean to be the deciding vote, I'd still like to know what others think. We haven't heard from very many people on this thread. Hey everyone out there who has ever had an opinion on the website, what do you think? Again, I'm

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-665) CMP - Prefetching of CMP and CMR fields

2005-06-07 Thread Gianny Damour (JIRA)
CMP - Prefetching of CMP and CMR fields --- Key: GERONIMO-665 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-665 Project: Geronimo Type: New Feature Components: OpenEJB Versions: 1.0-M4 Reporter: Gianny Damour