On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
FYI, I'm attempting to upgrade (install anew) to continuum 1.0 on
stan. Doesn't seem to be going well. If I can't get it running in
the next couple hours, I'm just going to bring our old install (1.0-
beta1) back online.
Upgrade
I will be out of the office starting 11/01/2005 and will not return until 11/02/2005.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Seems like everyone likes the idea, so let me recap into an actual
vote thread and just take the liberty of moving the +1s in.
+1s Jeff, Bruce, Matt, David J, Dain, John
0s Alan
No -1s so far.
Going to throw myself into the +1 group.
-David
Exactly. We've already made the mistake of not having G on mirrors
for a while (all fixed now, though) and I'm optimistic that what you
are doing is going to be really popular and well used.
I think we should pose this question to infrastructure just so the
are aware of what we're doing
On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I propose that we remove the old, unsupported, tags M1-M4 and place
them in geronimo/archive/tags.
[ ] +1 archive the old tags
[ ] 0 Don't care
[X] -1 keep the tags where they are
I'm of mixed feelings here, resolving to keeping them
I don't understand the harm of leaving the branches - it costs
nothing since it's already created, it keeps the history clear, and
it gives someone an opportunity in the future to work with it. I
know the probability of that is small, but people do weird things...
geir
On Oct 31, 2005,
aside
next time, can you put the old subject in the subject like [vote]
foo (was : what do you thing about foo?) as I think this will be a
confusing thing in mail archives later...
/aside
I do think it's a great idea to have a place for Geronimo-centric
build scripts and related
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Exactly. We've already made the mistake of not having G on mirrors for
a while (all fixed now, though) and I'm optimistic that what you are
doing is going to be really popular and well used.
I think we should pose this question to infrastructure just so the are
This is great!!
continuum wrote:
http://ci.gbuild.org/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/21
Our zones are done and I'm creating user accounts for those that
volunteered to help admin, namely jeff, bruce and david. I've run
into a small problem (solaris doesn't seem to like group names bigger
than 8 characters!) so I'll get that sorted and we can move forward...
geir
--
Geir
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Forget about multiple web containers. The issue is, I know there's a
servlet o.a.g.RemoteDeployerServlet running in some web app in
Geronimo. What is the URL to contact it? To start with, you need to
determine which web application it's in (since we already use
Thanks Jules! I think that work and
I'll confirm with the user.
Michael Malgeri
Mgr Gluecode Client Technical Services
PHONE: 310-536-8355 x 14
FAX: 310-536-9062
CELLULAR: 310-704-6403
Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/31/2005 11:25 AM
Please respond to
dev
To
+1
I was thinking the same thing. If implemented as a servlet it should be
independent of the console. What is used for local deploy should be
the same as remote deploy.
Joe
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Forget about multiple web containers. The issue is, I know there's
Updated view of configurations
--
Key: GERONIMO-1122
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1122
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: console
Versions: 1.0
Environment: all
Reporter: Joe Bohn
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1122?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1122:
---
Attachment: cfgtable.patch
The updated jsp
Updated view of configurations
--
Key: GERONIMO-1122
URL:
Please keep in mind the tooling scenarios for this as well.
I would eventually like like to see some type of granulized update
support. For example, if a user is developing a large application and
testing on a remote server, if a single file in a module is changed, it
would be quite an
Jeff G,
Are you still planning on checking in the Gbeans necessary for existing
Tomcat clustering or have you decided to jettison that in lieu of the
WADI solution?
Thanks
-Dave-
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Michael Malgeri wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to offer resources to test
I've added user accounts for the three fools^H^H^H^H brave volunteers
that have offered to join me as zone admins, jeff, bruce and david.
I'll need their public keys to finish this off. I looked at
minotaur, but all except jeff had multiple keys, so I'd prefer if
y'all would just tell me
where can i find puretls.jar, cryptix.jar and cryptix-asn1.jar so i can run ssl on tomcat?
Simon
Simon,
You don't need them to run SSL on Tomcat.
I assume you are referring to an Exception in geronimo.log. This is a
debug message printed by Tomcat and can be ignored. Tomcat
supports two SSL implementations (one of which is TLS). You see this
message when the load of TLS fails. Tomcat will
Hi Kevan,
Thanks for the reply; It just so happens that geronimo server is breaking the same moment this message is logged;
I'll look into that further...
Simon
Hi John,
Since this note is growing a lot, I wanted to summarize here some the
key things we need to address:
- Everybody, need more comments/opinions here!
- Review documentation strategy (what, where, how...)
- Define versioning policy for documentation.
- Create separated sections for each
Based on the last screenshot on this link it looks as if it does,
however I'm not sure how exactly its configured.
http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/platform-releng/updatesfor3.1.1.html
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Does eclipse support downloading plugins via a traditional mirror
system? For example,
On Nov 1, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 4:46 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Could I we this up for devtools as well?
Absolutely.
I'm not exactly sure how to build, though. Seems most of the
project.xmls use the extends tag so we won't be able
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1099?page=comments#action_12356532
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-1099:
It appears that this is not only related to GERONIMO-1047 ... but in fact is
the same problem. I have a patch that I'll attach
Only tricky part is that I depend on Eclipse, and a handful of other
Eclipse projects to build. And I'm usually picking up weekly builds
from them to build against. So is there something that could be set up
to be able to upload these external dependencies? I really wish my
eclipse
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1047?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1047:
---
Attachment: uninstall.patch
This fix ensures that the configuration is stopped before it is undeployed so
that it will not leave residual GBean trash in the
On Nov 1, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Only tricky part is that I depend on Eclipse, and a handful of
other Eclipse projects to build. And I'm usually picking up weekly
builds from them to build against. So is there something that
could be set up to be able to upload these
On Nov 1, 2005, at 7:16 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I've added user accounts for the three fools^H^H^H^H brave
volunteers that have offered to join me as zone admins, jeff, bruce
and david.
Awesome.
I'll need their public keys to finish this off. I looked at
minotaur, but all
Is there any way to get a view of JIRAs that have files(patches) attached?
If not, can we begin some kind of convention? I noticed that some folks
have added (Patch) to the start of the title for a few JIRAs. Do you
think that would be helpful?
I image it must be a pain for the committers
Not as far as I know. I'm tracking a JIRA ticket at Atlassian for the
ability to detect the existence of an attachment, but that stiff
doen't designate if its a patch unfortunately.
In our project we just query for patch in any of the text fields. We
generally find that people type that somewhere
I have a question regarding one of our build scripts, particularly the publish_build.sh
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/scripts/publish_build.sh
Why is there a build() at all ? The publish_build_archives() seems relevant and appropriate.
Cheers
Prasad
On Nov 1, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Is there any way to get a view of JIRAs that have files(patches)
attached?
If not, can we begin some kind of convention? I noticed that some
folks have added (Patch) to the start of the title for a few
JIRAs. Do you think that would be
On 11/2/05, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's cool. Continuum gets smart enough to do things like report
which test failed, etc. when you are dealing with a maven 1 or 2
project. Up to you if that is worth the trade-off of loosing
project.xml inheritance. You can always poke at
The problem with this is that when a person later attaches a file,
they usually don't have permissions to edit the issue and adjust the
custom field, so it only works when the attachment comes with
creation.
Maybe this is something that could be added to the ASF customisations
though (the bit
David Blevins wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Is there any way to get a view of JIRAs that have files(patches)
attached?
If not, can we begin some kind of convention? I noticed that some
folks have added (Patch) to the start of the title for a few JIRAs.
Do you
I like this suggestion for when you only want to pull up a list of JIRAs
that have patches attached (very creative).
One of the other things I was hoping to use this for was to look at a
release, component, whatever and see how many potential fixes we
already had and how many are still
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom updated GERONIMO-:
-
Geronimo Info: [Patch]
Use Trifork CORBA (freeorb)
---
Key: GERONIMO-
URL:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I have a question regarding one of our build scripts, particularly
the publish_build.sh
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/scripts/publish_build.sh
Why is there a build() at all ? The publish_build_archives() seems
relevant and
Done.
Geronimo and Geronimo-dev issues now have a custom Patch field at
the bottom of the issue. Here is a report:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
mode=hiderequestId=12310367
Now I'll try to figure out the security issue raised by brett.
-dain
On Nov 1, 2005,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom updated GERONIMO-:
-
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Use Trifork CORBA (freeorb)
---
Key: GERONIMO-
URL:
Registered JIRA users already have permission to edit issues, so this
should not be a problem.
-dain
On Nov 1, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Done.
Geronimo and Geronimo-dev issues now have a custom Patch field at
the bottom of the issue. Here is a report:
Since on one objected, I added a geronimo-contributers group that can
assign, resolve and be assigned issues. If this is becomes an issue
the group can be removed just as easily as it was added.
If you are a contributor (i.e. you have submitted some patches) and
would like to be able to
On Nov 1, 2005, at 2:21 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 11/2/05, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's cool. Continuum gets smart enough to do things like report
which test failed, etc. when you are dealing with a maven 1 or 2
project. Up to you if that is worth the trade-off of
Yes, please sign me up for the geronimo-contributors jira karma.
I also understand that if I am not completely satisified I can return
the karma and keep the Ginsu knives as a free gift!
Joe
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Since on one objected, I added a geronimo-contributers group that can
assign,
Request for contributor karma...
--kevanOn 11/1/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since on one objected, I added a geronimo-contributers group that canassign, resolve and be assigned issues.If this is becomes an issuethe group can be removed just as easily as it was added.If you are a
Done.
-dain
On Nov 1, 2005, at 4:56 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Yes, please sign me up for the geronimo-contributors jira karma.
I also understand that if I am not completely satisified I can
return the karma and keep the Ginsu knives as a free gift!
Joe
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Since on one
Done.
-dain
On Nov 1, 2005, at 4:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Request for contributor karma...
--kevan
On 11/1/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since on one
objected, I added a geronimo-contributers group that can
assign, resolve and be assigned issues. If this is becomes an
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1109?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1109:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Need class for server shutdown
--
Key: GERONIMO-1109
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-922?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-922:
--
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Provide a simple filter to show or hide Geronimo system applications in the
Application views.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-922?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-922:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.0)
Provide a simple filter to show or hide Geronimo system applications in the
Application views.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1028?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1028:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
WebLogViewerPortlet does not honor the date in the search
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1047?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1047:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
undeploy using uninstall in Applications Management page doesn't do the
cleanup properly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1064?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1064:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
WebConnector portlet results in CodeGenerationException when G is configured
for tomcat
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1063?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1063:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
Viewing server logs results in warning message in command prompt
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1068?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1068:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
When viewing the Web Access Log only records from the earliest date in the
search are displayed
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1099?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1099:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
Version: 1.0-M5
(was: 1.0)
patch available in 1047
Error
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1122?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1122:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
Updated view of configurations
--
Key: GERONIMO-1122
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1108?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1108:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
CertManagerPortlet is being loaded for the SecurityRealms portlet
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1070?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1070:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version: 1.0
Network Listeners added through console are lost upon server restart
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1118?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-1118:
Resolution: Fixed
Sending
trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/MultiParentClassLoader.java
Transmitting file
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-670?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom reassigned GERONIMO-670:
---
Assign To: Dain Sundstrom
Use of undocumented fields with setAccessible
-
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-670?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-670:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Removed:
./modules/system/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/main/ToolsJarHack.java
generate geronimo-service.xml files from marked dependencies in project.xml
---
Key: GERONIMO-1123
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1123
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
The last nail in the coffin for me was when, in a sleep deprived
state, I got a little disoriented and built the M5 installer from the
branch directory rather than the tag directory. Accidents happen.
A simple svn copy cheaply creates a new branch, keeps it clear its
different than the
65 matches
Mail list logo
