[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?page=comments#action_12357111
]
Kresten Krab Thorup commented on GERONIMO-1145:
---
In the A-B-C scenario, why is it that the relevant CSS info is not included in
the reference? If we use
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?page=comments#action_12357112
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1145:
First of all, I don't think CSS info is ever encoded in an IOR, just TSS info.
Let me see if I can make my example more
Kresten Krab Thorup (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?page=comments#action_12357111 ]
Kresten Krab Thorup commented on GERONIMO-1145:
---
In the A-B-C scenario, why is it that the relevant CSS info is not
Brett Porter wrote:
This is one of the requirements of incubation, so it will be taken
care of there -
can you clarify this.
are you saying that these licensing constraints do not apply in the
incubator - that we just dump all our code in there, no matter what,
provided that licensing
I'm not on the incubator PMC, so this is just my personal
understanding. I may be getting in over my head :)
On 11/9/05, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you saying that these licensing constraints do not apply in the
incubator - that we just dump all our code in there, no matter
I have created the following wiki page from the unknown.txt file you checked in:
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Maven2Conversion
My hope is that it will help us track our progress and encourage others
to volunteer. I'll start off by taking the jakarta commons and
pluto dependencies and making
Thaks for the clarifications, Brett.
Jules
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm not on the incubator PMC, so this is just my personal
understanding. I may be getting in over my head :)
On 11/9/05, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you saying that these licensing constraints do not apply in
On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:23 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
This is one of the requirements of incubation, so it will be taken
care of there -
can you clarify this.
are you saying that these licensing constraints do not apply in the
incubator - that we just dump all our code in
On Nov 9, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Kresten Krab Thorup (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1145?
page=comments#action_12357111 ]
Kresten Krab Thorup commented on GERONIMO-1145:
---
In the A-B-C scenario,
On 11/9/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you import GPL at compile time, the virality of the GPL requires
that you license under the GPL, so clearly that's not allowed.
Geir, do you know if this includes the use of reflection against a
class so as to avoid a compile time
On Nov 9, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 11/9/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you import GPL at compile time, the virality of the GPL requires
that you license under the GPL, so clearly that's not allowed.
Geir, do you know if this includes the use of
After doing the conversion I know how much of a pain this is, and I
just wanted to let you guys know I really appreciate the effort.
Thank you,
-dain
On Nov 9, 2005, at 4:10 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
I have created the following wiki page from the unknown.txt file
you checked in:
On 11/9/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 11/9/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you import GPL at compile time, the virality of the GPL requires
that you license under the GPL, so clearly that's not
Hi all,
I updated the LDAP section (in the confluence site) with a sample
application (based on JIRA 417) and instructions on how to configure
LDAP on Geronimo when using Jetty as the Web container. Here is the link
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/LDAP
Hi,
I've just came across a question and am not sure if I'm correct (well,
even if I am, it's always better to hear it from others, isn't it? ;))
There's the targetDir attribute of deploy:unpackServer (you can take a
look at the source in
Installment 1 of new Epiq provided look and feel
Key: GERONIMO-1149
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1149
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: console
Versions: 1.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1149?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1149:
---
Attachment: NewLook1.patch
Installment 1 of new Epiq provided look and feel
Key: GERONIMO-1149
I just put the first installment in the updated look of the Web Console
(as provided by Epiq) in a patch on GERONIMO-1149. There's still a good
bit more to do but here is a link to some screen shots so that you can
see what we have thus far in the patch.
NullPointerException when no security element is in plan
Key: GERONIMO-1150
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1150
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: web, deployment
Versions: 1.0
David, Dain, others,
I would like to volunteer for this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/9/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After doing the conversion I know how much of a pain this is, and Ijust wanted to let you guys know I really appreciate the effort.
Thank you,-dainOn Nov 9, 2005, at 4:10
Is the option's value of the initialContextFactory fixed to all other
JVM vendors?
initialContextFactory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
On 11/10/05, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I updated the LDAP section (in the confluence site) with a sample
application (based on JIRA
I ran 'mvn -U install' from the m2assembly directory and wound up
with this output. Should give us an idea of what is there, missing
and invalid. Can someone pick through this output and update the
wiki page?
-David
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-704?page=comments#action_12357179
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-704:
--
AFAIK, the rmi registry is bound to INADDR_ANY. The
java.rmi.registry.LocateRegistry.createRegistry(..) method does not have
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-444?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-444:
---
Fix Version: 1.0-M5
(was: 1.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
This was fixed before.
New CLI deployer
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-710?page=comments#action_12357183
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-710:
---
Hasn't this been done?!?
Generating DDLs for CMP deployment
--
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1019?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder reassigned GERONIMO-1019:
--
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Exception for bad servlet-mapping
-
Key: GERONIMO-1019
URL:
Changing EJB port from 4201 to another value in config.xml does not take effect
---
Key: GERONIMO-1151
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1151
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1150?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1150:
---
Version: 1.0-M5
(was: 1.0)
NullPointerException when no security element is in plan
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-804?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-804:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Revision 332215
Redeploy should calculate ModuleID to replace if not provided
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1120?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1120:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Revision 332215
Auto-detect config ID for a deployable archive
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-710?page=comments#action_12357188
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-710:
Not completely: so far, we have an Ant task to generate the DDL commands. I
think that we need to add support for
Thanks David J.!
On Nov 9, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Geronimo
Wiki for change notification.
The following page has been changed by djencks:
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Maven2Conversion
So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess spec-j2ee is a rollup of
all (or most of) the others? Is there a preference for whether other
modules should depend on the individual spec modules or the overall
On Nov 9, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
I've just came across a question and am not sure if I'm correct (well,
even if I am, it's always better to hear it from others, isn't it? ;))
There's the targetDir attribute of deploy:unpackServer (you can take a
look at the source in
Awesome! Jump on in. Just pick some deps that you'd like to work on and
sign up on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Maven2Conversion
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
David, Dain, others,
I would like to volunteer for this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/9/05, *Dain Sundstrom* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup. It's on my plate for the morning (if no one beats me :) )
David
David Blevins wrote:
I ran 'mvn -U install' from the m2assembly directory and wound up with
this output. Should give us an idea of what is there, missing and
invalid. Can someone pick through this output and update the
I think referring to one is simpler. That way exceptions will stand out. I'm
not sure I see a downside.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
So I notice that the JSR-88 code is in
geronimo-spec-j2ee-deployment-1.1-rc4.jar and also
geronimo-spec-j2ee-1.4-rc4.jar. I guess spec-j2ee is a rollup of
all (or most
I have a REALLY REALLY REALLY strong preference that ALL geronimo
modules depend ONLY on the specs they actually use. I would prefer
that we don't build the universal spec jar or that we build it after
everything else is built and all the configurations are built. I
really prefer to know
Man, you're kicking butt! This is awesome.
-David
On Nov 9, 2005, at 8:26 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Yup. It's on my plate for the morning (if no one beats me :) )
David
David Blevins wrote:
I ran 'mvn -U install' from the m2assembly directory and wound up
with this output. Should
From a Maven point of view with transitive dependencies, this is
imperative. The universal jar should just be a distribution
convenience (if it is built at all).
- Brett
On 11/10/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a REALLY REALLY REALLY strong preference that ALL geronimo
modules
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1150?page=comments#action_12357194
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1150:
Schema validation can't fully validate the security info. If you specify a
security-realm-name to allow login, you
Joe Bohn wrote:
I just put the first installment in the updated look of the Web
Console (as provided by Epiq) in a patch on GERONIMO-1149. There's
still a good bit more to do but here is a link to some screen shots so
that you can see what we have thus far in the patch.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera closed GERONIMO-:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied.
Use Trifork CORBA (freeorb)
---
Key: GERONIMO-
URL:
+1 this would be a significant improvement
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'd like to create a log level for major events that the user should
know about that are not bad, such as a deployment. They don't fit
into WARN or higher because they're not bad. But I don't want them to
get lost in the noise
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 11/9/2005 10:14 PM:
I'd like to create a log level for major events that the user should
know about that are not bad, such as a deployment. They don't fit
into WARN or higher because they're not bad. But I don't want them to
get lost in the noise that is currently our
45 matches
Mail list logo
