I have checked in some initial Clustering GBeans for Tomcat. As I
developed this, it appeared that the Tomcat version 5.5.9 did not match
the Tomcat doc. This led me to examine the Tomcat objects and
changelog. It would appear that there were some improvements between TC
v 5.5.9 and 5.5.12,
Jeff Genender wrote:
If there are any issues, let me know.
Well, not on my side, but...did you open a JIRA issue for it? People
wouldn't forgive us when the upgrade would not be listed.
Jeff
Jacek
Ah ... that's the heart of the issue. Based upon the current console
capability, it has primary been a J2EE application server console. From
what I can tell that's primarily been Geronimo's focus as well. All of
the J2EE application servers I've seen have one web container to manage
and
On Nov 10, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevan Miller wrote:
Is there an official policy for Copyright year? How rigorous are we
expected to be? ASF must have a policy and I'm confident that
we're not
complying... Do we need a
Good point! I will open it.
Jeff
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
If there are any issues, let me know.
Well, not on my side, but...did you open a JIRA issue for it? People
wouldn't forgive us when the upgrade would not be listed.
Jeff
Jacek
Upgrade to Tomcat 5.5.12
Key: GERONIMO-1167
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1167
Project: Geronimo
Type: Task
Components: Tomcat
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: Jeff Genender
Assigned to: Jeff Genender
Fix
Highlight links, clean up some colors
-
Key: GERONIMO-1169
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1169
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: console
Versions: 1.0
Environment: all
Reporter:
Update Geronimo Welcome page to Epiq provided look and feel
---
Key: GERONIMO-1170
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1170
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: console
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
So how should this be handled? In software-world works are things
that end up being modified quite often. In this context, which is the
correct year of creation - when it was originally initiated/ conceived
(first
I think for 1.0, we'd like to support multiple web containers in the
console, for example, with a simple hierarchy in the connector list
screen:
Tomcat
- HTTP
- HTTPS
- AJP
Jetty
- HTTP
- HTTPS
- AJP
Create new Tomcat connector: HTTP, HTTPS, AJP
Create new Jetty connector: HTTP,
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
I'm interested in testing and helping to document geronimo Tomcat
clustering. As a first step, I've setup a Tomcat cluster independent of
Geronimo. Once I get this fully working, I plan to reuse the
configuration info in the geronimo environment.
Thank you for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1169?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1169:
---
Attachment: NewLook3.patch
Updated login.jsp main.css with look feel improvements.
Highlight links, clean up some colors
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1169?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1169:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Highlight links, clean up some colors
-
Key: GERONIMO-1169
URL:
Hi Jeff and all,
I will do the second guinea pig, i would like to run 3 tomcat instances
inside geronimo. The purpose is to be able to upgrade apps on my website
without downtime. I was wondering if i can derivate some GBeans to
implements some farming on my cluster (deploy the webapps on
Ludovic Maitre wrote:
Hi Jeff and all,
I will do the second guinea pig, i would like to run 3 tomcat instances
inside geronimo. The purpose is to be able to upgrade apps on my website
without downtime. I was wondering if i can derivate some GBeans to
implements some farming on my cluster
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1141?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1141:
---
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0)
This can be deferred. Have a valid workaround.
Need a better way for a client to programtically
Hi,
First, I would recommend that you have a good understanding of how
Tomcat clustering works. See:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster-howto.html
Now..a disclaimer...
All I did was enable the Tomcat clustering and extend it into Geronimo.
This means that 99% of it should
I agree with this approach for V1 if we can keep the user's view
restricted to just the container or containers that are installed and
give no hint of the container that is not installed.
However, I'm not sure of the longevity of such an implementation beyond
V1. If we really intend to
Part 1 showed a simple clustering for the Engine. This is doable at the
host level as well by *not* setting the CatalinaCluster attribute for
the Engine, but setting it for the Host.
Now what about the Context? This is where the geronimo-web.xml comes in...
You will create your
We're getting fairly close to the time where Turkey's will dominate the week and
then soon thereafter folks will converge on San Diego California for ApacheCon.
Here is the working list of content and the status as best I can tell:
- More console work
Look and feel upgrades added.
Complex Clustering GBeans
-
In the last 2 parts I explained how to set up simple clustering with a
single class for Engine/Host/Context levels. Now we can expand on this
for more complex settings. The following are the Clustering Gbeans that
have been created:
Jeff Genender wrote:
IMHO, I would test this on multiple machines before a single machine
with a single instance since you will probably run into other problems
as well with other services in Geronimo. After you get a multi-machine
cluster working, then we can configure it for a single
I wouldn't mind TCK testing what we've got as soon as David J has the
Tomcat/Jetty distros ready and calling it 1.0-RC1 if we can finish the
TCK in the next week or so.
On a side note, it still feels like there are some significant bugs
out there, though I haven't reviewed the list. Can you send
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1161?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1161:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-1161.patch
Patch file attached.
Web Server - Network Listeners - HTTPS Listener edit page updates
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1161?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1161:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Web Server - Network Listeners - HTTPS Listener edit page updates
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1097?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1097:
---
Assign To: Donald Woods
(Patch) Keystore Portlet should point to the default keystore file instead of
ssl-keystore-1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1128?page=all ]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-1128:
--
Assign To: Donald Woods
Derby Log Viewer performance problem
Key: GERONIMO-1128
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-911?page=all ]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-911:
-
Assign To: Donald Woods
Admin Console should require SSL
Key: GERONIMO-911
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-717?page=all ]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-717:
-
Resolution: Invalid
No changes required. Cancelling.
Root configurations should use dependencies not manifest classpath. Requires
built-in
Blevins,
Here they are.
Updates:
1. properties variable ${maven.exe}
2. changed the command line syntax to skip tests.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/11/05, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Done. Moved the maven executable to the properties file.
2. Hmm.. The svn info command seems to work
Hi,
I'm having a hard time building the Trifork ORB in sandbox/freeorb. I'm
trying to follow /README-M2-BUILD.txt, but step 2 doesn't work for me.
When I try to compile specs/*corba, I get
geronimo-spec-corba mvn install
...
The plugin 'org.codehaus.mojo:maven-idlj-plugin' does not exist
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Anyway, on your list, hot deploy directory is done, but it would be
nice if people could test it and make sure there aren't any issues.
And I haven't actually been working on remote deployment yet, though I
still mean to. :)
Just did a quick smoke test of the hot
Anyone know why a velocity.log file is being created in the bin
directory? Just happened to notice it.
Sachin
GBeanInstance should load reference types from types classloader, not gbeans
classloader
Key: GERONIMO-1171
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1171
Project: Geronimo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1171?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1171:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Sending
modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/runtime/AbstractGBeanReference.java
Transmitting file data .
SecurityBuilder needs to use configuration classloader to construct principals.
---
Key: GERONIMO-1172
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1172
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1172?page=comments#action_12357656
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1172:
Thanks to Jian Liao for discovering this problem.
SecurityBuilder needs to use configuration classloader to construct
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1172?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1172:
--
Resolution: Fixed
I also renamed our principal info classes to avoid name conflicts with
java.security.Principal.
Sending
Make DatabaseInfo load from file; separate JDBC and XA portlets
---
Key: GERONIMO-1173
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1173
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: databases,
Yup, good catch. I think the default configId is the module name
without its file extension -- can you confirm that's what you got (by
running deployer.jar list-modules, for example)?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/14/05, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Anyway, on your
Hot deployer should know when a file was last deployed
--
Key: GERONIMO-1174
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1174
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: deployment
Versions:
Schema conversion problems in geronimo plans
Key: GERONIMO-1175
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1175
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1172?page=all ]
David Jencks reopened GERONIMO-1172:
Apparently this is not actually fixed.
SecurityBuilder needs to use configuration classloader to construct
principals.
I'm not able to reproduce this failure locally and I don't see how to
access the test reports to see what is wrong. Any ideas? Do others see
this problem?
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:43 PM, continuum wrote:
http://ci.gbuild.org/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/
44 matches
Mail list logo
