Once those things are done, it'd be great to get a new release out.
(At some point we need to figure out how to deal with Spring 2.x's non
backward compatability with the xbean-spring module)
James
On 4/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like at least
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1844?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-1844:
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks. The console is very snappy now.
Precompile jsp pages in console
---
Key:
Thanks to Prasad we now have percompiled jsps in the console, and the
console is much snappier on initial load.
The difference is so drastic on my g4 mac, I'd like to see us
preprocess the welcome application also since it is the very first
impression of our users.
Thanks for working on
Way to go Prasad! A big old +1 to faster startup improvements.
-David
On Apr 20, 2006, at 11:54 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Thanks to Prasad we now have percompiled jsps in the console, and
the console is much snappier on initial load.
The difference is so drastic on my g4 mac, I'd like to
To Allow configurable password digests during REALM Deployment.
---
Key: GERONIMO-1880
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1880
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public
Remove obsolete interop module
--
Key: GERONIMO-1881
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1881
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: general
Versions: 1.2, 1.1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1881?page=comments#action_12375535
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-1881:
Committed version 395839 for 1.1 branch.
Remove obsolete interop module
--
Key:
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Resolved, Closed (25 items)
Updated In Last: Week (7 days)
** New Feature
* [GERONIMO-1845] Add minimal-tomcat-server assembly (little-G) to Geronimo
1.1
** Bug
* [GERONIMO-1878] Cannot redeploy the console
* [GERONIMO-1763] default config.xml does not
On 4/21/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then the only real vote that counts is Aaron I really need this
feature Mulder's. ;)
Aww, you know you'll thank me when the release notes come out. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1
[X] +1 - Close development for 1.1 on Monday 4/24 0600 PT
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1 and start putting the wrapping tape
on the box. There have been new features / functions coming in and at
some point we need to collectively get this one out the door and
Deploy from web console fails with NoSuchOperationException
---
Key: GERONIMO-1882
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1882
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1882?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1882:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Deploy from web console fails with NoSuchOperationException
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1875?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1875:
---
Attachment: 1875_axis+builder.patch
This patch splits out axis from j2ee-server and axis-builder from j2ee-deployer
More work to port little-g to 1.1
On 20 Apr 2006, at 21:58, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 4/20/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A short shell script which adjusts CurrentJDK back and
forth between 1.5.0 and 1.4.2 is all that's needed. The
Java Preferences panel in Utilities doesn't cut it.
Thanks for David Blevins, here
This problem has been fixed. You need to do an update and rebuild the plugins.
+1
- sachin
On Apr 20, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1 and start putting the wrapping
tape on the box. There have been new features / functions coming
in and at some point we need to collectively get this one out the
door and focus on
+1
On 4/20/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1 and start putting the wrapping tape on the
box. There have been
new features / functions coming in and at some point we need to collectively
get this one out the
door and focus on 1.2. So here
OK that sounds good.
- Dan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like at least http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-2 to be
fixed before the release.
Just have to apply the patch.
There are also patches for XBEAN-4 (m2 plugin for mapping generation) and
XBEAN-6 (bad dependencies scope) pending.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1881?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1881:
Resolution: Fixed
Commited revision 395903 in head branch.
Remove obsolete interop module
--
Key:
[X] +1 - Close development for 1.1 on Monday 4/24 0600 PT
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1 and start putting the wrapping tape on
the box. There have been new features / functions coming in and at some
point we need to collectively get this one out
I'm trying to understand the significance of this modification. Is this considered a short term
fix? If not, then my take is we are communicating that folks building J2EE application should *NOT*
be using Maven as it generated artifacts whose names are too large. Or we are communicating that
David,
I've just run the saaj tck and jaxrpc tck (both standalone) on the
branch mentioned below. All Green.
Thanks,
dims
On 3/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims created an Axis 1.4 final branch in early Dec at:
Make sure all documentation is clearly marked as G 1.0 or G 1.1
---
Key: GERONIMO-1883
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1883
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular
Dain,
In that case, should we consider moving the goal:precompile up to
the /etc level ? This can then be generically used by any application
wanting to precompile. Initially I left them in console-framework and
console-standard thinking they'd be the only ones. But now I see that
there is a
Sounds good to me.
-dain
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Dain,
In that case, should we consider moving the goal:precompile up to
the /etc level ? This can then be generically used by any application
wanting to precompile. Initially I left them in console-framework and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1875?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1875:
---
Attachment: 1875_axis+builder+clientDeploy.patch
David, Please apply this patch with the really long name
I have been attempting to build from source for 2 days following the
instructions on the wiki. I keeps failing while executing maven new
with unsatisfied dependencies.
Can someone please work with me off line (maybe via aim) to help me
resolve this? I am not super familiar with maven but I
+1
and I agree with Aaron about being flexible about ship date
Any interest in releasing/announcing at JavaOne?
geir
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we close 1.1 and start putting the wrapping tape on
the box. There have been new features / functions coming in and at some
Hi Ryan,
I don't have AIM but I could try to help you if you come on IRC. I
also have Yahoo msngr. You may send me a mail directly.
Cheers
Prasad
On 4/21/06, Ryan Ovrevik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been attempting to build from source for 2 days following the
instructions on the wiki. I
Samples not installed properly in G1.1 - several issues
---
Key: GERONIMO-1884
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1884
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Resource/EJB Refs search top-level deployments (or change docs)
---
Key: GERONIMO-1885
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1885
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular
NPE on simple web app deployment
Key: GERONIMO-1886
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1886
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1884?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder reassigned GERONIMO-1884:
--
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Issue #2 is known -- the samples have to be exported and added to the plugin
download site, and all the ones there were
Let's plan on a 1.1-beta some time between May 1 and May 8 if we think
most of the functional errors are fixed, then a 1.1-rc as soon as
we're comfortable with any fixes to the beta and we think all the
softer things like documentation and stuff are fixed, and then a 1.1
as soon after that as
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1886?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1886:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: David Jencks
This was fixed in the Jetty distribution by a change late in the day 5/20 and
in the Tomcat
Remove unneeded jars from console WEB-INF/lib directories
-
Key: GERONIMO-1887
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
In recognition of his contributions and participation in the Apache
Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the
committership of Rick McGuire.
Rick has contributed in many places, and is a pleasure to work with, and
we look forward to his continued involvement as a
Hello,
I am looking for a way allow for a pool of MessageDriven pojo's to act on a
queue. I am porting over code that allowed for a thread pool to read from a
queue and am looking to do similar behavior with ActiveMQ.
Would I simply have to set maxMessagesPerSession and/or maxMessagesPerBatch.
All,
How would you feel about referring to configurations (e.g. a group of
GBeans with own ID and classloader) as a module instead? It seems
like configuration can be confusing, as it more traditionally refers
to a larger scope like an entire installation. For example, if you
say you have two
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1875?page=comments#action_12375631
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1875:
first 4 patches applied by rev 395993. Needed a couple tweaks and a fix to
UnavailableEJBReferenceBuilder.
More work
+1 and I think I had a hand in calling them configurations
I have found people very very confused (blank stares) when I start
talking about configurations.
One issue with this change is it should be reflected in the XML, and
console. This would mean renaming configId in the xml to
On 4/21/06, Conrad O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's nice and neat but does it also need to set $JAVA_VERSION?
I've had builds of different projects get all upset when the java
version on the path is 1.4.2 but the JAVA_VERSION env var is set to
the 1.5.
I have never bothered to set
+1
- sachin
On Apr 21, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
How would you feel about referring to configurations (e.g. a group of
GBeans with own ID and classloader) as a module instead? It seems
like configuration can be confusing, as it more traditionally refers
to a larger scope
On 4/21/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
How would you feel about referring to configurations (e.g. a group of
GBeans with own ID and classloader) as a module instead? It seems
like configuration can be confusing, as it more traditionally refers
to a larger scope like an entire
Better help for bad references
--
Key: GERONIMO-1888
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1888
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: usability
Versions: 1.0
Support zip files in sharedir in addition to jars
-
Key: GERONIMO-1890
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1890
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1890?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1890:
---
Attachment: 1890_sharedlibzip.patch
Support zip files in sharedir in addition to jars
-
Key:
Congratulations Rick!!! Great work and certainly well deserved.
Joe
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
In recognition of his contributions and participation in the Apache
Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the
committership of Rick McGuire.
Rick has contributed in many
Meaningless ERROR printed by attribute manager during redeploy
--
Key: GERONIMO-1891
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1891
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1890?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1890:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied rev 396018
Support zip files in sharedir in addition to jars
-
+1
It is easier to grasp -
J2EE module : deployable unit with deployment descriptor
geronimo module : serialized deployable unit created with a plan
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 and I think I had a hand in calling them configurations
I have found people very very
Hi Guys, The build failed with the following errors. Any ideas??Btw I was on revision 396023 when I did svn up.---Build Errors-test:compile: [javac] Compiling 13 source files to /opt/workspace/geronimo/modules/security/target/test-classes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1802?page=comments#action_12375647
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1802:
Patches dbpools.patch, jms.patch, and webserver.patch (or equivalent) have been
applied. Thanks!
Console breakage in
Congratulations! Rick.
Anita
--- Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Rick!! Well deserved. I saw your commits earlier today on
scm and thought something must be up :-)
On 4/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of his contributions and
Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
application is very ugly
jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
username: system
password: manager
Click on the tree to see mbeans... edit them on the right
-dain
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up
charts of property values and alerts if certain thresholds are
exceeded and so on?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/21/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jconsole service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
The extent if my playing was to poke mbeans. I have no idea if it
can graph data. If it can't maybe someone knows of a better one that
can.
-dain
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
OK, but what can you do with it? Just poke MBeans? Or can you set up
charts of property
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1891?page=comments#action_12375658
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-1891:
I'm seeing this message when undeploying any application.
Meaningless ERROR printed by attribute manager during redeploy
If no body started work on this JMX portlet I can
start working on it.
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug
application. The
application is very ugly and hard to us. Also
doesn't allow you to
execute simple operations like
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1866?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1866:
--
Resolution: Fixed
step 2 in rev 396048
Make the packaging plugin output to target/ then JAR that into the local repo
mc4j might work too, though it may need some updates to support 1.x,
not sure:
http://mc4j.org/
--jason
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Works for me. Could someone put together a detailed howto on hooking
JConsole up to Geronimo and doing some typical things there?
+1
--jason
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think we should completely remove the jmx-debug application. The
application is very ugly and hard to us. Also doesn't allow you to
execute simple operations like setAttribute or invoke, so it is
really only useful for
+1, module is better.
--jason
On Apr 21, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
How would you feel about referring to configurations (e.g. a group of
GBeans with own ID and classloader) as a module instead? It seems
like configuration can be confusing, as it more traditionally refers
CONGRATS Rick !!! Very well deserved
Cheers!
Hernan
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
In recognition of his contributions and participation in the Apache
Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the
committership of Rick McGuire.
Rick has contributed in many places, and is a
Corba failures on startup
-
Key: GERONIMO-1893
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1893
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Versions: 1.1
Environment: 1.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
David,
Thanks to Bjorn, i've update the docs as well in the AXIS_1_4_FINAL
branch. AFAICT, you need to run dist and srcdist targets to generate
the zips, then sign the release and upload them to
/www/www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis/1_4. You will need to add your key to
the KEYS [1] file as well.
67 matches
Mail list logo
