[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=all ]
Bernhard Wellhöfer updated AMQ-1017:
Attachment: mvn.log
The output for mvn -U -X -Dmaven.test.skip=true install mvn.log and rev
number 472803.
Build of current trunk with Maven2
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37390 ]
Bernhard Wellhöfer commented on AMQ-1017:
-
I just had the idea whether trashing your ~/.m2/repository could make the issue
reproducable on your side. May
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37391 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-1017:
-
I've tried trashing the local repo too - and it still works fine for me. I'm
kinda mystified why its failing for you.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37392 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-1017:
-
I guess we need someone else with a windows machine to trash their local repo
and try again - it could be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37393 ]
Bernhard Wellhöfer commented on AMQ-1017:
-
jcdesrochers wrote (see
http://www.nabble.com/Latest-4.1-SNAPSHOT-tf2516871.html) that for him the
build also
On 11/9/06, J. Patrick Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in using ActiveMQ to develop a market for
information currency (http://infoeng.sourceforge.net). I'm a real
ActiveMQ/Spring newbie, so I'm not very clear on how to create a POJO
to serve as a filter for certain
Hi,
I'm afraid that I can't blame you. :)
I would like to have a filter placed within the processing of
messages sent to a particular set of topics, where messages to a
particular topic are processed (in an application-specific way) to
remove certain information from the incoming message before
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37394 ]
Michael Murphree commented on AMQ-1017:
---
Greetings. I'm trying to build 472933 and I'm experiencing a similar issue.
I'm building with Maven 2.0.4, Java
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=all ]
Michael Murphree updated AMQ-1017:
--
Attachment: mvn-472933.log
This log shows a build of revision 472933.
Build of current trunk with Maven2 fails
I have uploaded the memory profile on a file sharing site, the link is:
http://s25.quicksharing.com/v/8490663/your_kit_memory_profile.bzip2.html
(the direct link is:
http://s25.quicksharing.com/d/8490663/1163090148/your_kit_memory_profile.bzip2)
Note: the bzip2 file is around 60 MB in size
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37397 ]
Adrian Co commented on AMQ-1017:
I just did a fresh checkout of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk with rev 473001.
Running in WinXP, did
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37398 ]
Adrian Co commented on AMQ-1017:
Also using maven-2.0.4 and java version 1.5.0_07
Build of current trunk with Maven2 fails
Incorrect redelivery behavior and counters
--
Key: AMQ-1038
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1038
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.0.1
Environment:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1028?page=comments#action_37400 ]
Adrian Co commented on AMQ-1028:
Could you provide more details of the setup?
Are you using a cluster of brokers or a standalone broker?
Are you using the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1024?page=all ]
Adrian Co reassigned AMQ-1024:
--
Assignee: Adrian Co
Exclusive Consumer Losing a Message
---
Key: AMQ-1024
URL:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1024?page=all ]
Adrian Co resolved AMQ-1024.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Hi,
I've fixed this in trunk rev 473219.
Maybe you can try the latest version in trunk. :)
Exclusive Consumer Losing
The latest weekly build of geronimo-jetty-j2ee includes support for
jpa. Here are some brief instructions. Note that this does not
include all the nifty jee 5 features such as resource injection and
deployment locating your persitence.xml file for you. However both
container managed and
The Messaging Way or MESTafarian way of solving these kinds of
problems is to have 2 destinations, X1 and X2. Publishers send to X1
then some process transforms those messages in some way and sends them
to X2. Then this approach works with any message provider and you can
have an arbitrary number
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2482?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2482:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Remove console JARs from WEB-INF/lib
Key:
Deployer operation failed: Error parsing ejb-jar.xml
Key: GERONIMO-2557
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2557
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2557?page=all ]
Christian Blicher updated GERONIMO-2557:
Attachment: ejb-jar.xml
This is the ejb-jar.xml file which fails when deplyoing our application.
Deployer operation failed: Error parsing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2557?page=all ]
Christian Blicher updated GERONIMO-2557:
Attachment: GISSales10EAR.ear
This is the EAR applicaiton we wish to deploy.
Deployer operation failed: Error parsing ejb-jar.xml
I think the [* ] progress bar is cool but we
should also consider dropping that to reclaim its 26 spaces. Any
points we get for having a cool progress bar are negated by the
frustration of seeing a truncated component name :-)
Best wishes,
Paul
On 11/9/06, anita
I definitely plan to take a look at this but I have a couple of items
to finish up on first. Do you intend to make this available in 1.2?
Best wishes,
Paul
On 11/8/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted a patch to GERONIMO-2413 Add a Certification Authority (CA)
CORBABean definitions in j2ee-corba-* plans don't contain references to the
SSLConfig.
--
Key: GERONIMO-2558
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2558
Paul,
I second that suggestion. I find it confusing to try and sort through
the various start up lines of embedded [ ...]Maybe a new syntax
of something like:
Starting Modules...
[1/20] org.apache.geronimo.configs.A
[2/20] org.apache.geronimo.configs.B
..
[20/20] my config
This way
On 11/9/06, Mark DeLaFranier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting Modules...
[1/20] org.apache.geronimo.configs.A
[2/20] org.apache.geronimo.configs.B
..
[20/20] my config
This way any exceptions or messages printed out by the modules would be
printed in between the lines of module starts. Also,
I like the progress bar :(, if length is an issue, then perhaps we could change the look of the progress bar.. What about something simply like a revolving "-"?On Nov 9, 2006, at 8:33 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:I think the [* ] progress bar is cool but weshould also consider
Hi Paul,
Yes, I intend to make this available in 1.2. Please review whenever it is possible for you..
Thanks,
VamsiOn 11/9/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I definitely plan to take a look at this but I have a couple of itemsto finish up on first.Do you intend to make this available in
On 11/9/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the progress bar :(, if length is an issue, then perhaps we could
change the look of the progress bar.. What about something simply like a
revolving -?
good idea.
Paul
First, if you want to see the time taken for each module, use the
--long startup option not the progress bar.
Second, I think the best way to resolve the space issue is to show
only the artifact ID (or artifact ID and version) instead of the whole
Artifact name (group, artifact, version, type).
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2558?page=all ]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2558.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 472968.
CORBABean definitions in j2ee-corba-* plans don't contain references to the
SSLConfig.
On Nov 9, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
First, if you want to see the time taken for each module, use the
--long startup option not the progress bar.
Second, I think the best way to resolve the space issue is to show
only the artifact ID (or artifact ID and version) instead of the
I've been looking at the snapshots we have in 1.2 and I'd like to
switch them to releases as soon as possible. Right now I think we
can convert the following to full releases.
TrqnQL
I talked to Matt about TranQL yesterday about getting a release, and
he said that yes development in
I don't know if we want jpa support in the minimal assemblies. I'm
putting it only in the j2ee assemblies until there's consensus that
we want it in minimal as well.
thanks
david jencks
Move org.apache.servicemix.jbi.audit package in its own module
--
Key: SM-740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-740
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-1986:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy (was: Matt Hogstrom)
TranQL Connector doesn't check Driver Class during deployment
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-740?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-740.
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Thu Nov 9 09:55:25 2006
New Revision: 472991
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=472991
Log:
SM-740: Move
My gut reaction is to leave it out and ensure that we have a plugin that
will install on the minimal assemblies if a user wants to include it.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
I don't know if we want jpa support in the minimal assemblies. I'm
putting it only in the j2ee assemblies until there's
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1986.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Krishnakumar for providing the patch.
Fixed in rev 472993 (branches\1.1) and rev 472998 (trunk).
TranQL
-1 on this as it stands. You are assuming that any connector that
has a config-property called Driver uses that property for a java
class name that is expected to be on the classpath. I can easily
imagine a jdbc wrapper for a specific database that has a Driver
config-property to choose
-1 on this, see comment on commit notice in branches/1.1
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vamsic007
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:08:00 2006
New Revision: 472998
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=472998
Log:
GERONIMO-1986 TranQL Connector
David,
I will modify the code to log a warning instead of throwing an exception.
--vamsiOn 11/9/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 on this as it stands.You are assuming that any connector thathas a config-property called Driver uses that property for a javaclass name that is expected
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, if you want to see the time taken for each module, use the
--long startup option not the progress bar.
I like to start the server using 'java -jar bin\server.jar', but I
can get used to using the script.. This is the console output
Cool, I didn't know that existed!
Mark
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 11/9/06, Mark DeLaFranier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting Modules...
[1/20] org.apache.geronimo.configs.A
[2/20] org.apache.geronimo.configs.B
..
[20/20] my config
This way any exceptions or messages printed out by the modules
I would like to ignore the warning issued by tomcat by setting
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.connector.MapperListener=ERROR. This
part of the code (see below) is not executed if the engine name is
Geronimo. This would allows us to refer to tomcat servlet MBeans as
Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1 and log4j to 1.2.13 to support the log4j TRACE
level
---
Key: SM-741
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-741
Project:
On 11/9/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, if you want to see the time taken for each module, use the
--long startup option not the progress bar.
I like to start the server using 'java -jar bin\server.jar', but I
can get
I have removed the permissions for anonymous users to
add comments on the wiki.
This is unfortunate, but imho necessary to avoid the
recent spams (that we will have to remove from all
pages).
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
I don't really like this solution. I really am against blocking logs
unless absolutely necessary since it potentially hides bigger
problems. Why don't you change the "Geronimo" in the Engine (in the
plan.xml of the config) to "geronimo" to help make this work?
Jeff
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks Paul! I had never used that before..
Anita
--- Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, if you want to see the time taken for each module, use the
--long startup option
Set publichQuotePriceChange to true in ejb-jar.xml so that MDBs get accessed
during Daytrader scenario runs
---
Key: DAYTRADER-22
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-22?page=all ]
Piyush Agarwal updated DAYTRADER-22:
Attachment: Daytrader-22.patch
Applying this patch will set the publishQuotePriceChange to true in the
ejb-jar.xml and enable TradeStreamerMDB to be
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reopened GERONIMO-1986:
---
Comment from David Jencks on rev 472993 and 472998:
You are assuming that any connector that
has a config-property called
Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo
mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in
name collisions.
-dain
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:28 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I am trying to set domain name for tomcat Mbeans to 'geronimo' instead
of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1986.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Modified the fix to log a warning instead of throwing a deployment exception if
class loading fails.
Rev 473023
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo
mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in name
collisions.
I agree with Dain as well.
-dain
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:28 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I am trying to set
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2482?page=comments#action_12448566
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2482:
---
Solution:
1. Modified applications\console-standard and applications\console-framework
not to
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo
mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in
name
collisions.
I agree with Dain as well.
I kinda think it would
That is exactly how I am setting it. The attached stack traced is
produced by changing 1 character in the EngineGBean!
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really like this solution. I really am against blocking logs
unless absolutely necessary since it
Can you please attach the stack trace? I didn't see it attached.
Jeff
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
That is exactly how I am setting it. The attached stack traced is
produced by changing 1 character in the EngineGBean!
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo
mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in
name
collisions.
I agree with
The trace was in the original mail. I was getting
noSuchMethodException for findMappingObject then for
findStaticResources and welcomeFiles. Please see:
http://www.nabble.com/Geronimo-jmx-question-p7074389.html
I added these to TomcatWebAppContext. Now I am getting the attached
trace.
I think its generally a bad practice to make .html URLs into
redirects... I only added those others for compatibility.
If you want to make a new redirect, I'd use /faq or /kb
You also don't need the xdocs/redirects anymore.
On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+RewriteRule
Swt! Lets nuke this file (and pending-merge-log.sh), update the
STATUS and then drop the dead-1.2 branch :-)
--jason
On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pmcmahan
Date: Thu Nov 9 12:40:32 2006
New Revision: 473069
URL:
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we find out
exactly what problems this causes before we reject it out of hand?
I am more concerned about the fact that the GlobalRequestProcessors
are returning all zeros statistics for all the connectors. I was hoping
if enough people looked at
Dude, you saw the email before me getting it in my inbox, wow !!!
I just kept the same structure I saw there. The reason for this redirect is
that the welcome app (in the Console) points to a faq.html page that is no
longer used.
I would rather point to the appropriate resource directly from
JdbcAuditor fails on JBoss
--
Key: SM-742
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-742
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-core
Affects Versions: 3.1
Deadlock in JBoss Deployer during shutdown
--
Key: SM-743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-743
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Environment:
I went thru all_changes.log and for each remaining item marked Not
Merged I verified that it is either already in trunk or is
unnecessary. I marked r389206 as merged because I think all the parts
that trunk needs are there but if someone has a min could you please
double check it?
Best wishes,
Request/Response for jms through MessageID/CorrelationID
Key: SM-744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-744
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
I retested using RC6 and it looks great!
+1
Paul
On 11/9/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to recent bug fixes and copyright changes that went in, I've spun a new
RC and am extending the vote another 72 hours.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-536?page=comments#action_37401 ]
Grant McDonald commented on SM-536:
---
I was having a look at the patch again and I've got a question.
in the deploy on AbstractXBeanDeployer we have the following
I think it's about time we start this ball rolling, so let's take a vote on
whether to call the source archive located here:
http://people.apache.org/~tabish the official 1.0 release of activemq-cpp
What do you think, is it time to put this one to bed?
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37402 ]
Jonas Lim commented on AMQ-1017:
I did a fresh checkout with rev 473056 and build against a clean repository.
Runnng Windows Server 2003, java version 1.5.0_05
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-536?page=comments#action_37403 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-536:
The validate method has been added on the deployer to allow custom validations
in addition to the basic endpoint
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-536?page=comments#action_37404 ]
Grant McDonald commented on SM-536:
---
I thought as much. I'll update it to throw DeploymentException and add in a
validate method to the AbstractWsd1Deployer
Agreed - this is long overdue! I've just tried it out on linux and all is
well.
+1
On 11/9/06, Timothy Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's about time we start this ball rolling, so let's take a vote
on
whether to call the source archive located here:
http://people.apache.org/~tabish
I am trying to build geronimo trunk with command mvn clean install -U -up, but encountered the following exception while building Building Geronimo Configs :: Jetty Deployer. Could someone help me?
thanks,- Jian Liao[INFO]
79 matches
Mail list logo
