[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-747?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-747.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Nov 15 23:27:55 2006
New Revision: 475605
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=re
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-767?page=comments#action_37462 ]
Christopher G. Stach II commented on AMQ-767:
-
IE 6 was doing the right thing.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.1
http://www.w3.
On 11/16/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think OpenEJB 2.2 will be the first release since moving to Apache.
Ahh, I thought I missed the day when OpenEJB itself moved out, i.e.
graduated. Thanks for clarification.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
On 11/16/06, Geronimo Weekly Status wrote:
Dead 1.2 - There are still 26 unmerged commits the dead 1.2 branch. These
commits must be merged before the 1.2 release. The current status of the
dead-1.2 changes can be found at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/all_changes.log
JBI compliant SE for Quartz
---
Key: SM-747
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-747
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-quartz
Reporter: Guillaume Nod
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-767?page=all ]
Ken Gallo updated AMQ-767:
--
Attachment: mainDecorator.patch
changed to for main.jsp in decorators
> avoid use of XHTML in activemq-web-console so things work great in IE 6
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-767?page=comments#action_37460 ]
Ken Gallo commented on AMQ-767:
---
When activemq-web-console is deployed on IE 6, it just shows a blank page.
doesnt work on IE 6
it should be:
I've attached a patc
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-11-05 18:03:59 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo 1
Hi Vik,
In your activemq configuration file you add the ff. configuration :
jmxDomainName="org.apache.activemq" * rmiServerPort="1097"*/>
Regards,
Jonas
Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at the AMQ code for ManagementContext.java and found the
following
Ok. I've created a new JIRA space for ActiveMQ CPP..
see:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP
I've made you a jira admin for the space so you should be able to add
components / versions for the space. You should also be able to move
all the issues from the AMQ space to this new sp
Why don't we get the ball rolling on graduation and IF they choose to
make us a TLP, then we start looking into that??
On 11/15/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 15, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Want to take the lead on that? :) please!
Sure. Any nominations
Hi Matt, very-well articulated. I'm ready and I particularly like the idea of having a separate branch to
house the 5.0 code. I have some JSF code and JSR-88 deployment code for 5.0 that is looking for a good home
and a dedicated branch (and/or trunk) will mitigate some of the synchronization pro
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-25?page=comments#action_12450253
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on DAYTRADER-25:
Great idea...stock split.
So, for 1.2 we'll add the logic you suggested above and for 2.0 look at splits.
Nic
On Nov 15, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 11/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll help...first I want to run it on OEJB since this will be
their first
time out of the incubator.
I don't get it. What are you referring to saying "this will be their
first time out
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-908?page=comments#action_37459 ]
Aaron Mulder commented on AMQ-908:
--
Here are the Geronimo ones:
[GeronimoUserPrincipal|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-security
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-908?page=comments#action_37458 ]
Ken Gallo commented on AMQ-908:
---
Hi!
I am currrently working on this improvement and I'm wondering what are the
other possible principal implementations available ou
about time :) -
+1
On 15 Nov 2006, at 16:48, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
We can keep the 4.1.x bra
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2564?page=comments#action_12450230
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2564:
I assume since you assigned this to 1.1.1 you are trying to use g. 1.1.1. In
this case I think that geronimo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-25?page=comments#action_12450225
]
Christopher James Blythe commented on DAYTRADER-25:
---
Opps minor typo...
newPrice = price + (changeFactor * price)
> Update decimal precision
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-25?page=comments#action_12450223
]
Christopher James Blythe commented on DAYTRADER-25:
---
Matt...
You mean it isn't possible for someone to become trillionare in DayTrader? What
On 11/15/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we supposed to have the license on every XML, HTML, XSD, etc? I
guess so, I just had thought of the license issue as more
Java-centric.
You're right. Each and every source file that's distributed must have
the license.
@see http://www.a
Kevan Miller wrote:
*Source Distribution*
*
*
why is there a juddi jar in our source tree?
(server/trunk/applications/geronimo-uddi-server/repository/juddi/juddi/0.9rc4/juddi-0.9rc4.jar)
We have a copy of juddi local because the juddi project has not
published the jars yet.
(the scout pro
On 11/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll help...first I want to run it on OEJB since this will be their first
time out of the incubator.
I don't get it. What are you referring to saying "this will be their
first time out of the incubator"?
As to the Rant's output, will you be
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2396?page=comments#action_12450213
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2396:
I actually committed this class by accident, it is in trunk. Should I remove
it again?
> DatabaseInitializat
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2571?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2571.
---
Regression: [Regression]
Resolution: Fixed
trunk
Sending
modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/MultiParen
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2571?page=comments#action_12450208
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2571:
-
After looking at a profile for server startup I noted that we were spending an
inordinate amount of time in
Server Startup Time is Very Slow
Key: GERONIMO-2571
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2571
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions
Are we supposed to have the license on every XML, HTML, XSD, etc? I
guess so, I just had thought of the license issue as more
Java-centric.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/15/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took a look at the binary and src distributions that Dain created last
week. I r
Paul McMahan wrote:
> For my part I would like to help with the Tomcat v6 integration. I've
> looked at the Tomcat work that Jeff did for Geronimo 1.x and am
> hopeful that we can borrow from that design. I've been lurking on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and they're marching toward a v6 release which is
On Nov 15, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Want to take the lead on that? :) please!
Sure. Any nominations for proposed PMC Chair?
-Brian
On 11/15/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes!
We should present a fully formed resolution, based on the OFBiz
thread.
-Br
On Nov 15, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'll help...first I want to run it on OEJB since this will be their
first time out of the incubator.
I'm running on OpenEJB at the moment. Will post results to openejb-
dev@ shortly...
--kevan
Here is a challenge worthy of our talents! ;-) Now that Dain and
Alan have the 1.2 release nearly wrestled into a sleeper hold I agree
that the time is right to get real serious about a Java EE5 release.
The proposed dates sound aggressive but that's good because I think
they will help keep us m
Nice work Matt! I agree that JEE 5 implementation for Geronimo is
essential to make us very competitive. Seeing the dates for our possible
releases will definitely guide us developers on what to shoot for and
also give our users an idea on what to expect from Geronimo in the next
few months.
I'll help...first I want to run it on OEJB since this will be their
first time out of the incubator.
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I took a look at the binary and src distributions that Dain created
last week. I ran ARAT (http://code.google.com/p/arat/) and spent
some t
On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:10 AM, James Strachan wrote:
+1.
We should switch to Java 5 for compilation and for the default release
(since the concurrent stuff is faster & more bug free on Java 5) but
maybe provide a retrotranslator version of the jars for those who
can't move JVM.
i.e. build on Ja
Hi,
I was looking at the AMQ code for ManagementContext.java and found the
following code.
// Create the JMXConnectorServer
String rmiServer = "";
if (rmiServerPort != 0) {
// This is handy to use if you have a firewall and need to
// force JMX to use fixed ports.
rmiServer
Want to take the lead on that? :) please!
On 11/15/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes!
We should present a fully formed resolution, based on the OFBiz thread.
-Brian
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> I think this project is like the 40 year old virgin sti
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2570?page=all ]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2570.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 475392.
> Hard-coded CORBABean port in client-corba-yoko plan conflicts with
> j2ee-corba-yoko definitions.
>
Rally round the flag...
I really like these dates and it gives us something to shoot for. These
seem very reasonable to me.
But..."Drive to Five"? Reminds me of my 2 hours commute ;-) hehe...
great stuff!!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I've been noodling over our Java EE 5.0 release of Geronimo and
Yes!
We should present a fully formed resolution, based on the OFBiz thread.
-Brian
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I think this project is like the 40 year old virgin still living at
home with his parents. lol! Don't you think it's about time we get
the ball rolling on g
One of the big holes, is providing tooling support for JEE 5. I'm not sure how much JEE 5 support WTP will have by March. So for those looking for areas to help out, this would be a great place to look to help Geronimo indirectly. It would be a huge success not only to have JEE 5 server, but hav
Hard-coded CORBABean port in client-corba-yoko plan conflicts with
j2ee-corba-yoko definitions.
---
Key: GERONIMO-2570
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2386?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2386.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added "started" DEBUG message.
Fixed in rev 475348 (trunk) and rev 475349 (branches\1.1)
> Cleanup debug log entries cr
I agree that it is critical for us to support Java EE 5 quickly to be
competitive. I also agree that a common goal such as this (with target
dates and all) is a great way to foster community.
Moving this work to trunk or if need be a full branch will also help
resolve some of the issues that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2386?page=comments#action_12450128
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2386:
Well, this is "DEBUG" logging we're talking about. I would think getting lots
of log entries would not be too
Well, just for the record, I don't think the performance was all that
great under 1.1.x either. Even then the Jetty web console was the one
module that took a noticeably long time to start. It sounded from
Dain's message earlier like adding some caching for abstract names
might help.
Thanks,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2413?page=comments#action_12450120
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2413:
---
I would like this portlet to be in 1.2 release. Thanks to all who have
reviewed the patch and v
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2293?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2293.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix uses moduleFile.getCanonicalFile().getName() as artifactId. Incase of root
directories, "$root-dir$" is used as art
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2293?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2293:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
> Can't deploy exploded WAR with plan with no environment
> ---
>
I'm looking at this problem. I'm first comparing the older releases
of Geronimo as well as profiling. Just a heads up so we don't end up
having more than one person investing time in this.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish an
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2293?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2293:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Can't deploy exploded WAR with plan with no environment
> -
Wow ! Seeing dates and milestones has me really motivated.
I'm ready !!!
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been noodling over our Java EE 5.0 release of Geronimo and had
some ideas I wanted to share.
Given that the J2EE space is highly competitive I woul
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-14?page=all ]
Piyush Agarwal updated DAYTRADER-14:
Attachment: daytrader-14.patch.11152006
Based on the last comments by Chris, I have added the facility for failed SQL
statements to be written out on
I've been noodling over our Java EE 5.0 release of Geronimo and had
some ideas I wanted to share.
Given that the J2EE space is highly competitive I would love to see
us have a Java EE 5.0 implementation out before Java One. We might
not be the first on the block but we'll be in the pack an
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=comments#action_12450107
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-1293:
-
I concur that the gbean per servlet is too much overhead and we should find
another solution for this.
> Pr
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2569?page=all ]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2569.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in revision 475299
> Update source-repository in geronimo-plugin.xml
> ---
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2293?page=comments#action_12450096
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2293:
---
The exception is because File.getName() for the directory file is returning "."
and is being str
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2342?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-2342.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Jetty SSL Connector uses KeystoreGBean.
> Can't change keystore type for Jetty
> -
While trying to get JSTL 1.2 from Glassfish integrated into the JavaEE5
sandbox I discovered that the current implementation of Jetty6 in the
sandbox is still using JSP 2.0 (from tomcat/jasper). Jetty 6 itself
builds the api & runtime jars for both JSP 2.0 and JSP 2.1 using what I
believe is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1559?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona closed GERONIMO-1559.
Resolution: Fixed
I was able to verify this by changing my system time zone but like what Erin
said this portlet is just displaying
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2386?page=comments#action_12449995
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2386:
---
Kevan, adding a "Started" debug log entry will result in too many entries
logged. It will log
I took a look at the binary and src distributions that Dain created last week. I ran ARAT (http://code.google.com/p/arat/) and spent some time poking around the binary distribution. Here are the issues that I noted. I'm going to start working on the license/notice issues from the binary distributio
Update source-repository in geronimo-plugin.xml
---
Key: GERONIMO-2569
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2569
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regul
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-1293:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0
(was: 1.2)
> Provide tomcat statistics
> -
>
> Key: GERON
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=comments#action_12450030
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-1293:
--
There is a problem with our current tomcat (5.5.15) integration. In a
standalone mode tomcat (5.5.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2511?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2511.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in branches\1.1 in rev 475230.
> WEB-INF/Classes is not visible during deployment
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2552?page=comments#action_12450013
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2552:
Based on the SVG problems with IE6 reported in GERONIMO-1939 and now the
problems with IE7 reported in the use
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2263?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-2263.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Cannot recreate the error. Reopen the issuse if the problem still remains.
> Redeploy application from c
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1113?page=comments#action_12449976
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1113:
---
Since the apache directory server is not distruted in G now, is it still a
related project?
> W
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2552?page=comments#action_12449972
]
Christopher M. Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2552:
--
FYI, I started playing with dojo.widget.Chart and I was able to create a chart
programmati
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1868?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona closed GERONIMO-1868.
Resolution: Fixed
> Calculate /console prefix dynamically for SVG, etc.
> ---
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1388?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1388.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 475172 (trunk) and rev 475175 (branches\1.1).
> "Go" button should be moved to another location on the cons
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1388?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1388:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
1.2
(was: Wish List)
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> "Go" button
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1823?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona closed GERONIMO-1823.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
> Add Embedded LDAP Server Viewer Portlet
> ---
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1868?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona reopened GERONIMO-1868:
--
Accidentally closed this issue.
> Calculate /console prefix dynamically for SVG, etc.
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1701?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona updated GERONIMO-1701:
-
Fix Version/s: Wish List
This portlet should be modified to support JEE 5 changes, etc. Input needed for
redesigning portlet.
> I
Publish DST 2007 info for Geronimo
--
Key: GERONIMO-2568
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2568
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Ver
77 matches
Mail list logo
