Uuid class probably shouldn't use exception specifications
--
Key: AMQCPP-19
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-19
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Bug
Deadlock when in stomp connector close
--
Key: AMQCPP-20
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-20
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-20?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-20.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk
Removed the call to close from the asynchronous thread. The user will
eventually close it anyway ... that's the more
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-20?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler reopened AMQCPP-20:
--
Need to add better handling of close, so that we don't log an error or notify
the client if the broken socket was due to the sending of the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-20?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-20.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in trunk
Deadlock when in stomp connector close
--
Key: AMQCPP-20
Hi,
I am getting a problem with jms ExceptionListeners onException() call. When
I AMQ server is down on a remote host my client disconnects and
onException() is called but it wraps a EOFException(). And because of some
odd reason, that exception is not returned to my application for handling.
Hi Hernan,
I have been currently working on JBoss - Geronimo migration samples in
1.1 documentation. Please let me know how does this going to affect my
work?
Thanks,
Lasantha Ranaweera
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link.
Hi Rakesh,
Even I noticed this lack of error reporting in console. So, I tried to make
it some what better in the newly added CA Portlet. We definitely need
something uniform across all the portlets. Why don't you create a JIRA for
this?
--vamsi
On 12/1/06, Rakesh Midha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2608?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2608.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Earlier I changed the version to 1.0-SNAPSHOT
geronimo trunk updated to use this in rev 481185
openejb 2.3 updated to use this in rev
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2583?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2583:
---
Attachment: dependencyonlyjsr88.patch
Based on my last comment, here is a patch which defines dependency of
geronimo-gbean-deployer on
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2583?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2583:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Changing Priority to blocker, also marking patch available
I started updating the javaee5 stuff to build again after the changes
to the car-maven-plugin but have not yet succeeded. After I get it to
build a working server I'll move the rest of the new modules to trunk
(jpa stuff has already been copied)
thanks
david jencks
On linux and maybe other platform, the geronimo.out log file contains invalid
characters
Key: GERONIMO-2609
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2609
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2605?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2605:
---
Attachment: npeNoGroup.patch
Minor change, null pointer check required before using groupId
NPE if exporting plugin for module having dependency on
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2605?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2605:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Description:
If you have an application say ABC.war which has dependency on ABC.jar
and if dependency is defined
Hi, Last night I was fortunate to be able to present Geronimo to the Las Vegas
Java Users Group (JUG). It was held not in a casino but in the Gordon Biersch
Brewery. There were about 30 people in attendance and I understand that
accounted for fully 25-33% of the development community in Las
hi Prasad,
Thanks.
Another query. How to get the testsuites to use a tomcat assembly? It
always picks jetty assembly by default to run the tests.
Regards
Krish
On 11/30/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Krishna,
You are not limited to the browser (console) related tests. You
Thanks. It works when i installed FireFox. It doesnt work with IE
Regards
Krish
On 11/30/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Krishna,
I have seen this happen when I had a very old version of Firefox on my
machine. I upgraded to version 1.5.0.8 and now it works.
Cheers,
Prasad
On
Hi Hernan
As Lasantha said there pending documentations which are in progress of
writting for GV1.1.1 .My idea was to complete the on going stuff to
set in GV1.1.1 and finish those while we match GV1.2 for any of the
newly starting documents.
Would like to know your thoughts about this.Also how
Build error due to
---
Key: GERONIMO-2610
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2610
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2610?page=all ]
Kanchana Welagedara updated GERONIMO-2610:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2610.patch
Corrected the xml schema syntax and removed the Unexpected character encountered
Build error due to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2610?page=all ]
Kanchana Welagedara updated GERONIMO-2610:
--
Attachment: geronimo-web-1.2.xsd
Removed Unexpected character encountered from the xsd file
Build error due to
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2601?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2601:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Remove the Old Keystore portlet
-
Key:
I can't get things to build any more either. The changes for 480326
weren't reflected so I started to do that and just noticed that you did
the same with 481197. However, even with my local changes I couldn't
get it to build. I'll try it again with the changes you checked in and
see if I
I had used maven's natural lexical sorting order and 'provided' scope
to make sure that the configs were built in the correct order. The
provided scope was ignored by the car plugin. What mechanism is used
now to enforce the build order?
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lasantha,
this should not affect your present work. Since G v1.2 release is getting
closer I thought it would be better to focus updating the doc for this, more
stable candidate.
Feel free to continue rounding up your current articles for v1.1.1 and whenever
you think they are ready it
Simple answer:
--
That configuration is set in the trunk/pom.xml. Grep for defaultAssemblyId.
To change it, pass any of of the following params to the 'mvn' execution
-DdefaultAssemblyId=tomcat
or
-DassemblyArchive=/path/to/tomcat/binary.zip
or
As I said, this doc update should not get in your way to finish whatever you
are currently working on for G v1.1.1. I think it would be better to have those
doc you guys are working on finished before jumping to v1.2 doc.
I branched v1.1 doc, that's the GMOxDOC12 space. I removed all the
It would benice to automate the testing of the console functionality
to make sure we haven't broken anything and that we have broken
anything. I see you have that listed below. Perhaps if new
development included some tests that would be executed as part of
your new frame work :)
On Nov
Nice summary Tim, thanks...remember, what happens in Vegas stays in
Vegas :)
On Dec 1, 2006, at 5:50 AM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Last night I was fortunate to be able to present Geronimo to
the Las Vegas Java Users Group (JUG). It was held not in a casino
but in the Gordon Biersch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-6?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed DAYTRADER-6.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
This problem occurred while building configurations for DayTrader in Geronimo.
This is no longer the
Hi All,
For this release I would like to ask you guys to throw a line or two listing
the areas your worked on that represent new or improved features.
In the past I used to dig into the JIRAs but that took forever and always felt I was
missing a lot. So, this time it would be great to hear it
Thanks Joe! If you happen to have a server built from trunk could you
please let me know if the server starts without exception after
deleting xalan.jar and xmlParserApi jars from lib\endorsed.
Thanks In Advance
Anita
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Anita,
I'm not sure if this is
Thanks Dims!
Anita
--- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\ibm_sdk50\jre\libjar -tvf xml.jar | grep Trans
3056 Wed Nov 02 05:04:36 EST 2005
com/ibm/xslt4j/bcel/verifier/TransitiveHull.class
1032 Wed Nov 02 05:04:22 EST 2005
javax/xml/transform/sax/SAXTransformerFactory.class
I agree that exception handling is currently not one of the console's
strong suits. I have been thinking about introducing a new dojo
widget for displaying messages in the console. It would be based on
the dialog widget which you can see by clicking the show dialog
anchor in this page:
Hi Hernan,
Thnaks for the explanation.
As you suggested I will continue my work with G 1.1 documentation and
update it later in to the 1.2.
Thanks,
Lasantha Ranaweera
Hi Lasantha,
this should not affect your present work. Since G v1.2 release is getting
closer I thought it would be better to
Hi Hernan,
Thanks for the explanation.
As you suggested I will continue my work with G 1.1 documentation and
update it later in to the 1.2.
Thanks,
Lasantha Ranaweera
Hi Lasantha,
this should not affect your present work. Since G v1.2 release is getting
closer I thought it would be better to
We have made a small beginning in the console-testsuite by automating
the login/logout and testing a few links. We could go much farther
with this.
And since you spoke up Matt, I am wondering if there are any
performance testing we could to gradually track the health of the
server during each
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-15?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed DAYTRADER-15.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
Applied to 1.2 and trunk
This is from trunk...1.2 was done a while ago
Sending
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-19?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed DAYTRADER-19.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
2.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
Applied to trunk and branches/1.2.
Fix various HTML
On Dec 1, 2006, at 6:03 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I had used maven's natural lexical sorting order and 'provided'
scope
to make sure that the configs were built in the correct order. The
provided scope was ignored by the car plugin. What mechanism is used
now to enforce the build
Configuration should not have duplicates in allServiceParents
-
Key: GERONIMO-2611
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2611
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
I don't see it. Where else is this configured ?
Cheers
prasad
On 12/1/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is this configured here an in the projects top-level pom?
I don't get it... why would we use more than one version?
What is the point of this property here, and why would it
Hi David,
I understand your frustration, the wiki has grown big and we haven't caught up
with the navigation.
I will try to put some site map like pages for those spaces in the wiki. I
will work on some wiki layout doc to help understanding how the info is organized.
Cheers!
Hernan
David
Selenium will run with IE, but we are not yet set up to handle that
from the build.
--jason
On Dec 1, 2006, at 3:02 AM, Krishnakumar B wrote:
Thanks. It works when i installed FireFox. It doesnt work with IE
Regards
Krish
On 11/30/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Krishna,
The recommended and documented way to change the assembly is using
assemblyId, as in:
mvn -DassemblyId=tomcat
NOT -DdefaultAssemblyId as listed below. Also, while assemblyArchive
exists it is not recommended to use.
--jason
On Dec 1, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Simple
The problem here is that the dependencies on the deployers which the
car plugins use are not part of the reactor's list of dependencies
implicitly. So each car module needs to explicitly depend on the
config of its deployer or mvn will build things out of order.
This will bite you more if
snip
Bliss:~/ws/geronimo/server jason$ grep openejbVersion pom.xml
testsuite/ejbcontainer-testsuite/pom.xml
pom.xml:openejbVersion2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT/openejbVersion
pom.xml:version${openejbVersion}/version
pom.xml:version${openejbVersion}/version
Removed
Thanx
prasad
On 12/1/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bliss:~/ws/geronimo/server jason$ grep openejbVersion pom.xml
testsuite/ejbcontainer-testsuite/pom.xml
pom.xml:openejbVersion2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT/openejbVersion
pom.xml:
I was able to start the server without error after removing the xalan
and xmlParserApi jars.
Joe
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks Joe! If you happen to have a server built from trunk could you
please let me know if the server starts without exception after
deleting xalan.jar and
NPE thrown in console when shutting down server
---
Key: GERONIMO-2612
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2612
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
Some portlets in the console can't size correctly
-
Key: GERONIMO-2613
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2613
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
LDAP Viewer portlet should warn you is the LDAP support plugin is not installed
and/or started
--
Key: GERONIMO-2614
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2614?page=all ]
Hernan Cunico updated GERONIMO-2614:
Component/s: console
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2)
Affects Version/s: 1.2
LDAP Viewer portlet should warn you is the LDAP support
I'm having some trouble figuring out why I'm getting a
ClassCastException and would appreciate if someone could shed some
light...
In TomcatModuleBuilder I implement an additional interface
ModuleBuilder2 as well as add..
static {
...
So what you get back is ordinarily a proxy to the actual service. If
you get the abstract name for the returned module builder (the kernel
has a call to do that) and then get a fresh proxy to it (from the
proxy manager from the kernel), does it include your new interface?
If so, it suggests that
Hi Aaron, just out of curiosity where would one look to find this warning
message you refer to below since the scenario that Sachin described is during
the build process
Thanks
Tim
Aaron Mulder wrote:
So what you get back is ordinarily a proxy to the actual service. If
you get the
Thanks Aaron.. see inline.
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
So what you get back is ordinarily a proxy to the actual service. If
you get the abstract name for the returned module builder (the kernel
has a call to do that) and then get a fresh proxy to it (from the
proxy manager
Are you sure the GBean in question actually implements the interface?
And that the module builder you're interacting with is definitely
using the implementation class you think it is? (Maybe you copy and
pasted the GBeanInfo block from old to new GBean and it's referring to
the old class instead
On 12/1/06, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron, just out of curiosity where would one look to find this warning
message you refer to below since the scenario that Sachin described is during
the build process
I have a very dim understanding of the M2 build process. If there
I am trying to build latest code and I get a problem with javamail
dependency.
Here is what I see, any help is appreciated:
[INFO]Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
--
1)
org.apache.geronimo.javamail:geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_provider:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2611?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2611.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Duplicates removed from allServiceParents in rev 481464
Trunk only, not applied to 1.2
Configuration should not have duplicates in
Not enough info when a gbean ref can't be verified during deployment
Key: GERONIMO-2615
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2615
Project: Geronimo
Issue
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2615?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2615.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 481466 (trunk) by appending the message from the
GBeanNotFoundException.
A more sophisticated mechanism might be to add
Yep, the GBean does implement the interface, and the GBean isn't a
new GBean, I just modified an existing GBean with an additional
interface.
On Dec 1, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Are you sure the GBean in question actually implements the interface?
And that the module builder
65 matches
Mail list logo
