[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1016) 4.1 RC1: META-INF/spring.schemas refers to building user file:/Users/chirino/

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37836 ] Endre Stølsvik commented on AMQ-1016: - Just to point out for any viewers of this bug that have the same problem

[jira] Closed: (AMQCPP-32) Stomp messages don't preserve property types: please document this behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-32. Resolution: Fixed I have documented the behavior here

[jira] Commented: (SM-510) The servicemix-jms component should support the ability to set jms message properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37839 ] Christian Schneider commented on SM-510: I am also interested in this feature. We are trying to make the jms

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2689) New View for JNDI name in all the contexts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2689: --- Attachment: allviews.patch New View for JNDI name in all the contexts

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2689) New View for JNDI name in all the contexts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462999 ] Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2689: Posting a combined patch allview.patch which provides all the

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

Posted combined patch https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12348488/allviews.patch in JIRA 2689 Please review and commit. Thanks Rakesh On 1/8/07, Rakesh Midha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, Thanks for quick review, Joe, You are right about the difference in two

Re: possible 1.2 problem

On Jan 6, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Are you building openejb by hand, or are the deployed snaps up to date? I built OpenEJB locally. Looks like new snaps will need to be pushed out to pick up David J's changes... --kevan

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

Rakesh, I tried combining your patches last time and I was able to build the server but the it fails on startup with the following error: [* ] 93% 20s Loading org.apache.geronimo...19:29:49,3 12 ERROR [DeploymentFactoryImpl] java.lang.AbstractMethodError at

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

Hi Chris, I also had this problem. If you re-compile OpenEJB, then you should be fine. In a few words, ModuleConfigurer.getModuleType has been recently added and you are running with a EjbConfigurer which does not define this method. Thanks, Gianny On 08/01/2007, at 10:15 PM,

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

I am not sure what this problem is, please let me know what version of geronimo you are using and I will try it and let you know. Thanks Rakesh On 1/8/07, Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rakesh, I tried combining your patches last time and I was able to build the server but

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

Thanks Gianny I didn't notice that I have recompiled openEJB, otherwise I would have mentioned it in the comments. Thanks a lot, that saves my time :-) Thanks Rakesh On 1/8/07, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris, I also had this problem. If you re-compile OpenEJB, then you

Updated schema's in Geronimo website

Can we update our website with latest Schema's. The link http://geronimo.apache.org/schemas.html shows only 1.1 schema's, can we add 1.2 schema's also. Thanks Rakesh

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1585) Web app security on /* causes deployment exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463025 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1585: --- Sorry if I added to the confusion. Let us keep

[jira] Assigned: (AMQ-1096) activemq-console only has limited classpath/extensions directory functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Co reassigned AMQ-1096: -- Assignee: Adrian Co activemq-console only has limited classpath/extensions directory functionality

[jira] Assigned: (AMQ-1071) Activemq connection factory silently ignores the erroneous arguments in broker url

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Co reassigned AMQ-1071: -- Assignee: Adrian Co Activemq connection factory silently ignores the erroneous arguments in

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2695) Requests using Non-secure HTTP connections cannot access unsecured web resources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463030 ] Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2695: - Vamsi, the patch looks great. If you want to apply/commit it

Re: possible 1.2 problem

Thanks. I always wondered how it was working.. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r484869geronimo-server-trunk-pom.xml-p7769085.html thanks Anita --- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: I fixed GERONIMO-2686 in 1.2 but have not

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2695) Requests using Non-secure HTTP connections cannot access unsecured web resources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2695: -- Fix Version/s: 2.0-M2 1.2 1.1.2

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2695) Requests using Non-secure HTTP connections cannot access unsecured web resources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2695. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in rev 494061 in branches\1.1. Verified that the fix

[jira] Assigned: (AMQ-1020) Slow consumer terminally blocks both client and broker

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-1020: --- Assignee: Rob Davies Slow consumer terminally blocks both client and broker

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1020) Slow consumer terminally blocks both client and broker

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1020. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.2.0 This is fixed by the default use of cursors and the

[jira] Commented: (AMQCPP-32) Stomp messages don't preserve property types: please document this behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37832 ] Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-32: -- I agree with Tim - this really should be commented on the wiki page.

[jira] Commented: (SM-805) Incompatible BPELWSDLLocator between wsdl4j-1.5.2 and wsdl4j-1.6.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37833 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-805: Author: gnodet Date: Mon Jan 8 05:57:23 2007 New Revision: 494073 URL:

[jira] Resolved: (SM-805) Incompatible BPELWSDLLocator between wsdl4j-1.5.2 and wsdl4j-1.6.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-805. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.1 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Author: gnodet

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

2 is bad enough already... 6 or 8 or 10 or whatever is insane IMO. Just because G is flexible enough to be configured in such different ways, does not mean that we need (or should) to ship assemblies with those configurations or run the TCK against them. I think we really need to pick one

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1016) 4.1 RC1: META-INF/spring.schemas refers to building user file:/Users/chirino/

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37835 ] Endre Stølsvik commented on AMQ-1016: - Just wanted to point out that in the 4.1 release, the line in question

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2707) Cannot deploy app client from ear

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463047 ] Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2707: Hello Dario I am not sure what source code are you looking at.

Re: Milestone 2 - Its coming :-0

Here's a quick Web Services support update (of things I'm aware of): 1) The StAX and JAXB support has been recently added to Geronimo. This addresses both Axis2 and CXF deliverables (since both will use the same implementations of these API). 2) Basic JAX-WS support for POJOs is also working

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:38 AM, David Jencks wrote: rather than saying we'll only ship when we have all 6 it seems more appropriate to me to say that we'll ship the assemblies that people are willing to work on which includes TCK testing. Any other ideas on how to handle this? Anyone

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

I think these new UIs look great and are very useful. I'm in favor of integrating them into Geronimo. However, I am concerned about how the patch integrates them. I would very strongly prefer that they be integrated as plugins instead of directly into the admin console. As a matter of fact I

Re: possible 1.2 problem

On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: Are you building openejb by hand, or are the deployed snaps up to date? I built OpenEJB locally. Looks like new snaps will need to be pushed out to pick up David J's changes... This is one reason why I had chosen before to always build the

Re: possible 1.2 problem

What version of Geronimo does that SNAPSHOT of OpenEJB depend on? --jason On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jan 6, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Are you building openejb by hand, or are the deployed snaps up to date? I built OpenEJB locally. Looks like new

[jira] Resolved: (SM-800) jsr181 component, no such method asList

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-800. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Assignee: Guillaume Nodet jsr181 component, no such method

Re: possible 1.2 problem

On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: What version of Geronimo does that SNAPSHOT of OpenEJB depend on? 1.2-SNAPSHOT --kevan

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2708) ConcurrentModificationException in ConnectionTracking with Daytrader 1.2 under load

ConcurrentModificationException in ConnectionTracking with Daytrader 1.2 under load --- Key: GERONIMO-2708 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2708

Re: possible 1.2 problem

On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: Are you building openejb by hand, or are the deployed snaps up to date? I built OpenEJB locally. Looks like new snaps will need to be pushed out to pick up David J's changes... This is one

trunk wont start

Hi All, I just did a fresh build with NO ERRORS !!! however I can not run neither Jetty or Tomcat. Both dists come to life partially but fail with the same error, see logs. Anyone else seeing this problem? Cheers! Hernan 10:52:06,046 INFO [root] --

Re: possible 1.2 problem

What is the svn URL for this build? And do you know what the svn URL is for the OpenEJB codeline which depends on G 2.x? --jason On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: What version of Geronimo does that SNAPSHOT of OpenEJB

Patches in RTC (Geronimo - 2007-01-08)

Geronimo - Monday, January 8, 2007 5 Patches in RTC [GERONIMO-2638] Improve ModuleBuilder and ConfigurationBuilder interfaces to replace use of JarFile - Assignee: Sachin Patel - Reporter: Sachin Patel - Created: Thu Dec 07 23:41:31 GMT 2006 - Updated: Fri Jan 05

Re: possible 1.2 problem

On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: What is the svn URL for this build? And do you know what the svn URL is for the OpenEJB codeline which depends on G 2.x? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb2 There isn't a OpenEJB 2 branch that depends on

Re: trunk wont start

On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I just did a fresh build with NO ERRORS !!! however I can not run neither Jetty or Tomcat. Both dists come to life partially but fail with the same error, see logs. Anyone else seeing this problem? Until a new OpenEJB snapshot

Re: trunk wont start

Building openejb might help. Please see: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-ClassLoader%2C-JNDI-and-Dependency-views-in-console-p8216259.html Thanks Anita --- Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I just did a fresh build with NO ERRORS !!! however I can not run neither Jetty or Tomcat.

Re: possible 1.2 problem

Okay, I thought there was a branch that depended on 2.0 artifacts at one point... --jason -Original Message- From: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:12:33 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: possible 1.2 problem On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jason Dillon

Re: trunk wont start

Can someone from the openejb team please publish new snaps. --jason On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I just did a fresh build with NO ERRORS !!! however I can not run neither Jetty or Tomcat. Both dists come to

Re: Specs change(s)

On Jan 7, 2007, at 9:13 PM, David Jencks wrote: That looks right to me except as someone pointed out it should really be jee rather than jee5 -- it wasn't j2ee14 :-) Yup... jee or javaee, prolly the latter since its the correct term from sun and doesn't sound like G when spoken. --jason

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-126) Geronimo Fails to Start: Port 1099 in Use

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463081 ] Arthur Ryman commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-126: --- Sachin, I don't understand your comment.

Re: ClassLoader, JNDI and Dependency views in console

Hi Gianny, That explains it. Your suggestion fixed the problem. Thanks, chris Gianny Damour wrote: Hi Chris, I also had this problem. If you re-compile OpenEJB, then you should be fine. In a few words, ModuleConfigurer.getModuleType has been recently added and you are running with a

Re: trunk wont start

On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: Can someone from the openejb team please publish new snaps. OK. Current 2.3-SNAPSHOT has been published... --kevan

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

I don't think its just TCK. I agree we should scope the configuration to a limited set but I'm also concerned about making assemblies available. Given my math challenged 6 which is really 8 I don't think we would want to generate every one of them. So I think from the download page

update on the Geronimo Plugin Central community site (longish)

I got a lot of great responses when I asked this list for feedback on Geronimo Plugin Central a few months ago. Since then I have been devoting some spare bandwidth towards improving the site. At this point I would consider its readiness for the community at large to be at the beta phase and

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1121) Kaha DB hangs on restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37838 ] Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-1121: - There are about 30 parties doing concurrent request / response

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2664) Servlet Filter Error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2664: Assignee: Joe Bohn

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2664) Servlet Filter Error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2664: - Affects Version/s: 2.0 Fix Version/s: 2.0 2.0-M2

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2664) Servlet Filter Error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2664: - Affects Version/s: 2.0-M2 Servlet Filter Error

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2651) Servlet annotations are not supported

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2651: Assignee: Paul McMahan Servlet annotations are not supported

[jira] Created: (SM-806) Error when deploying a SA using the jbi maven plugin when a component is stopped

Error when deploying a SA using the jbi maven plugin when a component is stopped Key: SM-806 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-806 Project: ServiceMix

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2651) Servlet annotations are not supported

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2651: - Affects Version/s: 2.0 Fix Version/s: 2.0 2.0-M2

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2707) Cannot deploy app client from ear

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463098 ] Dario Andrade commented on GERONIMO-2707: - My apologies, I must have disabled the client-deployer system

Re: trunk wont start

I just did a clean install and still see the runtime issue. Do I have to wack the local repo and rebuild again? Cheers! Hernan Kevan Miller wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: Can someone from the openejb team please publish new snaps. OK. Current 2.3-SNAPSHOT has

Re: [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2686) database creation pool wizzard fails to deploy

Howdy, I still see this behavior in rev #494097. Any ideas? Cheers! Hernan David Jencks (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2686.

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

(I'm not sure of the state of Cayenne) It looks like Geronimo are the caretakers of the Sun TCK at Apache (something we, Cayenne developers, still can't get access to). While Cayenne JPA provider requires fair amount of work to be compliant, it would be really helpful in our own testing

[jira] Created: (SM-807) Add jboss-service.xml to servicemix component so they can be properly deployed in jboss.

Add jboss-service.xml to servicemix component so they can be properly deployed in jboss. Key: SM-807 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-807

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

On Jan 7, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I was thinking about M2 this weekend and was considering many of the challenges we face in putting out certified releases. Up till now the number of permutations has been pretty limited and

Re: trunk wont start

You would have had to nuke your repo or mvn -U --jason On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: I just did a clean install and still see the runtime issue. Do I have to wack the local repo and rebuild again? Cheers! Hernan Kevan Miller wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Jason

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: (I'm not sure of the state of Cayenne) It looks like Geronimo are the caretakers of the Sun TCK at Apache (something we, Cayenne developers, still can't get access to). While Cayenne JPA provider requires fair amount of work to be

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:46 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: FWIU, JPA has a separate TCK for certification. You should ask on jcp-open at apache.org. We'll try that - thanks! Andrus

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Well, we depend on being able to listen to events on the EM which there is no spec interface for. I'm sure Cayanne has and interface that can provide us with the events, and when they send us the info we can add a hook for their Impl.

Re: [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2686) database creation pool wizzard fails to deploy

OK, after openejb 2.3 snap was released, whacking the local repo and rebuilding (clean install) the problem is gone in Tomcat, Jetty however still have problems. I'll test it further and open a JIRA. Cheers! Hernan Hernan Cunico wrote: Howdy, I still see this behavior in rev #494097. Any

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2642) welcome app not included in the jetty assembly.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-2642. -- Resolution: Fixed welcome app not included in the jetty assembly.

Re: Assemblies assemblies everywhere and which one to ship?

On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Well, we depend on being able to listen to events on the EM which there is no spec interface for. I'm sure Cayanne has and interface that can provide us with the events, and when they

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2709) Database creation pool wizard fails in Jetty

Database creation pool wizard fails in Jetty Key: GERONIMO-2709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2709 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2703) JSR-252 Tasklist (JSF 1.2)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-2703: Description: All tasks related to the integration of JSR-252 (JSF 1.2) (was: All tasks

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2650) JSP 2.1 error in Jetty/Tomcat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2650: - Affects Version/s: 2.0 2.0-M2 Fix Version/s: 2.0

Web Builders

Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency. It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as follows: web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec naming-builder -- j2ee-schema -- geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 Should naming-builder be

Re: Web Builders

On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency. Yikes!! It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as follows: web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec naming-builder --

Re: Web Builders

--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency. Yikes!! It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as follows: web-builder -

Re: update on the Geronimo Plugin Central community site (longish)

Looks nice Paul...just got back from a trip but I'll pay with it more later :) Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: update on the Geronimo Plugin Central community site (longish)

We can use the new plugin site to pay for stuff? Swet :-P --jason -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:52:15 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: update on the Geronimo Plugin Central community site (longish) Looks nice

Re: svn commit: r494291 - in /geronimo/server/branches/1.2: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/ modules/geronimo-client-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder/jsr88/ modules/ger

On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Mon Jan 8 17:21:35 2007 New Revision: 494291 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=494291 Log: Fix some deploy problems. geronimo-deploy-config needs to be in lib. What goes wrong if it isn't? I wondered if

Re: svn commit: r494291 - in /geronimo/server/branches/1.2: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/ modules/geronimo-client-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder/jsr88/ modules/ger

On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:00 PM, David Jencks wrote: I don't like adding more and more to lib. if this is only needed for jsr88 stuff I think we should consider starting up something on request to load the configurer gbeas and register them, using the repo. Me either... if we can avoid

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2711) specs/trunk fails to build

specs/trunk fails to build -- Key: GERONIMO-2711 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2711 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: specs

Re: Web Builders

The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar: ConnectorDocument$Facty.class ConnectorDocument.class ConnectorType$Factory.class ConnectorType.class Have they been renamed/moved? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- David Jencks [EMAIL

Connecting to temporary queue

Is there a way to connect to a temporary queue by name?' I'm trying to do the following: Component 1: Creates a jms message and a temp queue, puts the message on a queue. Component 2: Receives the jms message creates a request to another system, sends the request. Component 3: Receives a reply

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2707) Cannot deploy app client from ear

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rakesh Midha closed GERONIMO-2707. -- Resolution: Invalid Fix Version/s: 2.0 Closed this issue as a user error. (Invalid

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1079) Better error for missing primkey-field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rakesh Midha closed GERONIMO-1079. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: Verification Required)