[patch] JAAS Login for Batch Processes
---
Key: SM-812
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-812
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-components
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Koehler updated SM-812:
Attachment: patch.zip
[patch] JAAS Login for Batch Processes
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-811:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
servicemix-jms does not set SoapAction property for SOAP jms messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-620.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Issues with ServiceMix startup shell script on Solaris
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37874
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-812:
Cool :)
Just a question: did you handle the case where the EJB itself is
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Koehler updated SM-813:
Attachment: patch.txt
[patch] Unique Column Names for JdbcComponent
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37882
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-812:
Do you use ST flow, acegi ?
What happen if you dont set the subject property
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Dofonsou updated SM-808:
-
Attachment: SourceTransformer.diff
Servicemix jboss deployer
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-808.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Thu Jan 11 07:00:30 2007
Externalize values from main configuration file into a single property file
Key: SM-815
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-815
Project: ServiceMix
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-815.
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Thu Jan 11 08:05:55 2007
New Revision: 495271
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-813.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
So I implemted it. It works fine until now. I still have to do some
improvements on it but I guess I can provide it to you tomorrow.
Cheers,
Thomas
Thomas TERMIN wrote:
I found it. ;-)
I'm implementing at the moment the new service.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Forwarding to the dev list ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-783.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Hi,
I have a question regarding servicemix-jsr181 component. I want to know if
it has a thread pool or if I need to define several instances of it in order
to be able to attend simultaneous messages.
If it has a threadpool, is that the default behavior for any servicemix
component?
--
View this
The threading is the same as for servlets.
A single instance will server multiple concurrent requests.
If you need pooling, use spring pooling support when declaring
your pojo.
On 1/11/07, eburgos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding servicemix-jsr181 component. I want to
+1.
I will test smx+geronimo
gnodet wrote:
I think it's time to start the release process for 3.1.
I have been working on the distribution a bit, but
it needs more work to check that the samples all
work well, etc ...
So please test the release to ensure everything
is working well,
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grégoire A. updated SM-816:
---
Attachment: pom.diff
useless include log framwork into jboss deployer
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37900
]
Kit Plummer commented on SM-761:
Not sure if it is really related to this particular thread of discussion, but I
can
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37872
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-36:
I think I have two new reasons for possibly moving code from
Sure. It's the same as AMQ-866. Comment added on that case.
thx
Steve
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Steve,
I would be happy to apply your patch but could you open a JIRA issue at:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ
And attach your patch to that so that we have it properly
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37873
]
steve cook commented on AMQ-866:
Same problem with doubles.
This is just a byte order problem - here is a patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Strasheim updated AMQCPP-25:
---
Attachment: optobug.cpp
Bus error on Solaris OS from DataInput and DataOutput streams
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37877
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-25:
Figured it out! Looks like a strict aliasing (whatever that is)
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Co resolved AMQ-1046.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix added to r495172
Admin commands can be success using:
activemq-admin bstat
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Co resolved AMQ-1096.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix added to r495172
Added a activemq.classpath system property to extend the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37880
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-25:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463857
]
Kaoru Matsumura commented on GERONIMO-2577:
---
Hello Jeff and Shiva, I'm sorry to be late for reply.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463879
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-2577:
---
Kaoru,
Thanks for testing this.
Looks like Context level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R updated GERONIMO-2577:
--
Attachment: appClustering_server.xml
appClustering_context.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37883
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-25:
--
Hi Albert,
Great work! Looks like you might be onto something here.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37884
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-25:
--
As indicated in the links Albert provided, we should add the following
I agree with david.
-- dims
On 1/11/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:01 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
How hard is it to switch between the different assemblies once the TCK
testing environment is setup? If it is easy enough, maybe we should
first test all 8
Hi Lasantha,
I've been doing some integration test and build (enable the four modules in
modules\pom.xml and configs\pom.xml) yesterday and I found that I am having
trouble to start the axis2-deployer during the start of the server. Is that
why you didn't update modules\pom.xml for the 2
Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to
compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some code
hack.
Now the connector-builder needs the following classes:
ActivationspecType;
AdminobjectType;
ConfigPropertyType;
ConnectionDefinitionType;
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:05 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to
compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some code
hack.
Now the connector-builder needs the following classes:
ActivationspecType;
AdminobjectType;
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Rakesh Midha wrote:
Hello Chris,
Is there some specific scenerio where you are getting java heap
space error.
What I am guessing is that there can be a scenerio where
classloaders are cyclic. Is it possible, that
Classloader C1 is a parent of Classloader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2689:
---
Attachment: G2689-2690-2691_updated.patch
New View for JNDI name in all the contexts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463908
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2689:
minor change in all patch, check for null J2EE
New View for
Lin,
Please go ahead and upload the patch and add the stack trace in the comments.
thanks,
dims
On 1/11/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lasantha,
I've been doing some integration test and build (enable the four modules in
modules\pom.xml and configs\pom.xml) yesterday and I found
Is this issue still on the table? I haven't seen any specifics. In
general I'd prefer to stay away from G specific stuff and leave them
in deployment plans. However, if we make them available they should
be totally optional and users can make their own choices.
On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:18
Srinivas,
Your console config failed to start. It doesn't seem to be related to
the webservices-testsuite.
I suspect you may be encountering the long-path problem on windows.
By default, the geronimo-maven-plugin will unpack the Geronimo server
into the target directory of the project invoking
Geir,
What are the specifics around claiming certification? My
understanding is that to claim an assembly as certified that specific
configuration is tested and made available. Apart from that we can
ship any permutation but cannot claim those as certified. So if we
TCK tested:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463915
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Anita, on second thoughts, I wonder if we should have left
Could you attach your patch to that issue and make sue your click the
Grant license to ASF for inclusion in ASF works (as per the Apache
Software License ) option.
Thanks.
On 1/11/07, rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. It's the same as AMQ-866. Comment added on that case.
thx
Steve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-2722:
---
Description: Tomcat 6 does not support log4j by default. Instead it
provides support for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463926
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Prasad,
I made these changes:
schemas:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2722.
--
Resolution: Fixed
enable commons-logging in tomcat module
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37891
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-25:
Re: your first question. As we tried to debug this issue, we added
Dims,
I also noticed a while ago that the server was being unpacked in a
directory with name longer than 10 chars. I thought I was the only one
using Windows! You can do a grep -r for any string in
C:\APACHE\geronimo\testsuite\webservices-testsuite\target directory and
it will start complaining
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/11/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Here i go again on a wild goose chase :( Anyone have a clue?
- Fresh svn checkout of
Howdy,
I've been playing around with the integrated LDAP from the begining. It got
pulled out from the build when we came out with Geronimo plugins (somewhere
around v1.1.1)
Now I see it back in the branch for v1.2 and trunk, this feature is already
in the build however it still is available
Until we have an official Apache plugin repo, I think we should leave it in the
distro. I wrote the integration as an Apache piece of code and thus I feel
that should be the official distribution channel.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev list
Matt,
I don't think there is any requirement of exact combination of
components for TCK compliance. AFAIK, we need to ship the exact code
we tested, that's it. FWIW, it's self-certification as well :) So i am
happy if all the components are put thru the grinder at least once.
thanks,
-- dims
Thanks Prasad!
On 1/11/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/11/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Here i go again on
Thanks Anita!
On 1/11/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims,
I also noticed a while ago that the server was being unpacked in a
directory with name longer than 10 chars. I thought I was the only one
using Windows! You can do a grep -r for any string in
On 1/10/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
Are you suggesting that we should start architecting the console to
be more pluggable? Or suggesting that Rakesh rewrite these viewers?
We've talked about architecting the console to be more pluggable and
I'm definitely in favor of that.
Jeff,
How can we confirm if it is a Bug OR not supported Feature in Tomcat?
Ask on their lists.
Jeff
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se 5
now...
Anyone know?
--jason
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37893
]
Homer commented on AMQ-1121:
I have run into a similar issue where AMQ gets hung on restart. In my case,
the KahaStore
Yep I will do that.
- Shiva
On 1/11/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff,
How can we confirm if it is a Bug OR not supported Feature in Tomcat?
Ask on their lists.
Jeff
--
Thx,
Shiva
create axis2 config and axis2-deployer config folders
-
Key: GERONIMO-2724
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2724
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security
Yes, we don't need it. AFAIK. It was being used in Axis1...
-- dims
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se 5
now...
Anyone know?
--jason
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service
FYI, we are currently including this in lib/* and 12 modules
reference it in their poms.
I think we should remove these refs.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se
5 now...
Anyone know?
--jason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2724:
--
Attachment: g2724.zip
create axis2 config and axis2-deployer config folders
Dims, I've submitted it as G2724. I don't think the patch will hurt
anything as the axis2-deployer isn't turned on in the config.xml files.
I'll continue investigating why the axis2-deployer won't start.
Thanks, Lin
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove geronimo-qname_1.1_spec usage
-
Key: GERONIMO-2725
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2725
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
The 2.0-M1 configs published in the snapshot repo don't work with 2.0
any more because of the serialVersionUID added to GOperationInfo in
rev487505. Looks like the configs were published one day before this
change (just my luck).As a result, when I try to start a config
imported from the
I can publish a new set of snaps in a few... waiting for my server
build to finish first to make sure its happy, then I will publish new
snaps.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
The 2.0-M1 configs published in the snapshot repo don't work with 2.0
any more because
Thanks!
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can publish a new set of snaps in a few... waiting for my server
build to finish first to make sure its happy, then I will publish new
snaps.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
The 2.0-M1 configs published in
Anyone have any oppinon on creating meta-modules to group
dependencies that are commonly used together?
For example, in most places where xmlbeans is a dep, so is stax, as in:
dependency
groupIdxmlbeans/groupId
artifactIdxbean/artifactId
/dependency
dependency
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37894
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQCPP-25:
I've submitted changes that hopefully resolve the issues. So far it tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2725.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Remove geronimo-qname_1.1_spec usage
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, we are currently including this in lib/* and 12 modules
reference it in their poms.
I think we should remove these refs.
Agreed.
--kevan
Are we sorted on the schema versions for 2.0?
I just noticed we are still using snapshot versions:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.schema/groupId
artifactIdgeronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4/artifactId
version1.1-SNAPSHOT/version
/dependency
dependency
Are these two specs sorted? Can we switch to using the released 1.0
for them? server/trunk is still using:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.specs/groupId
artifactIdgeronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/artifactId
version1.0-SNAPSHOT/version
Same with geronimo-jta_1.1_spec
Also, looks like some of these specs are listed twice in the
dependencyManagement section... :-(
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are these two specs sorted? Can we switch to using the released
1.0 for them? server/trunk is still
I've found both of these:
dependency
groupIdstax/groupId
artifactIdstax-api/artifactId
version1.0.1/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdstax/groupId
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37895
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-25:
We might consider using -Wstrict-aliasing=2. Warns in more cases,
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQCPP-25.
Resolution: Fixed
Tests now pass, using latest trunk.
No BUS errors on Solaris.
Bus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2726:
--
Attachment: update.patch
Update JAXB and StAX implementation versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464006
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-2726:
---
The attached patch updates JAXB implementation to 2.0.3 version
On 1/11/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I've been playing around with the integrated LDAP from the begining. It got
pulled out from the build when we came out with Geronimo plugins (somewhere
around v1.1.1)
Now I see it back in the branch for v1.2 and trunk, this feature is
This is done... only took 62 minutes to deploy it all... :-(
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Thanks!
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can publish a new set of snaps in a few... waiting for my server
build to finish first to make sure its happy,
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 1/11/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
...
download/install as a plugin.
As far as I can tell the directory module was never removed from the
build. It just got removed from the list of components that are
enabled in the tomcat and jetty assemblies.
Axis2 needs 1.0.1. Can we please use that?
thanks,
dims
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found both of these:
dependency
groupIdstax/groupId
artifactIdstax-api/artifactId
version1.0.1/version
That would certainly help people understand why dependencies are
there and how they are related. Although, shouldn't the dependencies
be in the poms already? So if XMLBeans needed Stax they would have
already declared that and it could be derived transitively?
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:22
+1 to remove it.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se
5 now...
Anyone know?
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not overly knowledgeable about WebServices so I'll bear my
ignorance directly. Given that we'll have two options that users
will be able to choose from is there some way to abstract CXF and
Axis2 to a common point so users could install their preference
through a plugin? It would
Do we need the excludes?
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Axis2 needs 1.0.1. Can we please use that?
thanks,
dims
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found both of these:
dependency
groupIdstax/groupId
Nope.
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need the excludes?
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Axis2 needs 1.0.1. Can we please use that?
thanks,
dims
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found both of these:
Am at a point where i am struggling to get a test up and running in
the geronimo harness and connect to it from my debugger :) So am
absolutely the wrong person to ask :)
-- dims
On 1/11/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not overly knowledgeable about WebServices so I'll bear my
It may or may not be in the dependencies pom... depends on if its a
native m2 artifact or if its configured in the right scope.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
That would certainly help people understand why dependencies are
there and how they are related.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hernan Cunico closed GERONIMO-1386.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Issue addressed using autoexport plugin. All documentation now is
Aight, I running a new build to check that nothing freaks out and
will commit it shortly.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Nope.
On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need the excludes?
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas
OK now that I'm looking deeper into this things are becoming clearer.
First of all, as you pointed out the directory module is already
included in the jee5 assembly, which I wasn't aware of. Apparently
the commit that was supposed to have removed it from the dist only
updated the config.xml and
+1
-dain
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, we are currently including this in lib/* and 12 modules
reference it in their poms.
I think we should remove these refs.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks
It would be very nice if this could work like JPA where I set a
single property in my application to switch implementations.
-dain
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I am not overly knowledgeable about WebServices so I'll bear my
ignorance directly. Given that we'll have
Yikes!!!
Why are we including 2 legacy repos here?
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dims
Date: Thu Jan 11 13:45:01 2007
New Revision: 495390
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=495390
Log:
patch from Lin Sun for GERONIMO-2724 - create axis2
dain, +1000
-- dims
On 1/11/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be very nice if this could work like JPA where I set a
single property in my application to switch implementations.
-dain
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I am not overly knowledgeable about
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
