[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37981
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-46:
Running the crashing program repeatedly sometimes makes it crash
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 (win32) broker together with openwire-cpp client.
When sending messages to the queue,
the first message isn't relayed by broker, while others pass ok.
I 've modified example client to have separate producer and consumer apps,
that are attached.
Have you faced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466981
]
Lasantha Ranaweera commented on GERONIMO-2776:
--
Please ignore this patch1 since it will break the
Hi Lin,
Thanks for reviewing the patch. Please read my in line comments.
Thanks,
Lasantha
Lin Sun wrote:
Hi Lasantha,
Thanks for submitting the patch! Your patch (java portion) looks look to
me. I don't quite understand the pom.xml portion of the patch as to why the
changes are needed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-53.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in trunk
Declaration of extern int errno after including errno.h
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37977
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-49:
--
patches are always welcome :)
Add -W -Wall compile options
Could you please provide some more information?
Thanks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this has broken some stuff. This piece of code in
PersistenceUnitReference is no longer working:
entityManagerFactory = kernel.invoke(target,
Dain and I are still hacking away and we just ran into this issue.
It seems the xmlbeans tree from javaee 5 is invalid and needs to be
recreated.
Anytime someone either in a servlet or ejb declares a
PersistenceContext ref of persistence-context-type 'Transaction',
deployment will fail
Also it doesn't handle injection-target on -ref objects.
-dain
On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Dain and I are still hacking away and we just ran into this issue.
It seems the xmlbeans tree from javaee 5 is invalid and needs to be
recreated.
Anytime someone either in a
Ok, so Dain and I have worked all through the night again to try and
kill the last issues we've seen with the integration. We added a few
more tests and such the itests and have hammered away till things
worked. We had to do some ad-hoc surgery in the naming code and more
that will have
I hacked in support for @EJB in servlets in web modules, and tested
it with the calculator sample. It seems to work, but I only had one
ref to test, so let me know if you have any problems.
Tomorrow, I'm going to try to remove the requirement to have a
geronimo-openejb.xml file.
On Jan
I'm hitting this build failure this morning while building OpenEJB
Builder with rev. 499296
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO]
On 1/20/07, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 6:12 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Howdy,
it may sound weird asking this now but I'm either creating JIRAs
the wrong way or we are not displaying the all the info in http://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/geronimo (or I
FYI all openejb3 snapshots are current as of now, i.e.
20070124.144710, revision 499423.
-David
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:00 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, so Dain and I have worked all through the night again to try
and kill the last issues we've seen with the integration. We added
a few
I'm also failing with a very similar error at rev 499420.
Paul
On 1/24/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting this build failure this morning while building OpenEJB
Builder with rev. 499296
[INFO]
[ERROR]
Blevins just deployed the OpenEJB3 jars. So you may want to give it
another shot.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also failing with a very similar error at rev 499420.
Paul
On 1/24/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting this build failure this
I think the problem that Hernan reported last week building on Windows
is still alive and well. It doesn't seem to cause any problems on OSX.
I was hitting it yesterday and just hit it again today with the 2.0-M2
branch, rev. 499407.
It seems to me that there is something fishy with the
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:00 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We had to do some ad-hoc surgery in the naming code and more that
will have to be merged back to the M2 branch, but the result is a
lot more is working.
Just going to repost this then go to bed (promise :).
Cc'ing Matt as he signed up to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner reassigned GERONIMO-2682:
--
Assignee: Jason Warner
Sending a message throws a SendFailedException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner reassigned GERONIMO-2681:
--
Assignee: Jason Warner
IOException when reading content of a message
Yep ... picking up the updated OpenEJB3 jars did the trick.
Thanks!
Joe
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Blevins just deployed the OpenEJB3 jars. So you may want to give it
another shot.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also failing with a very similar error at rev
The following 2 issues are probably not causing the Error described
here, but they seem related..
1. I noticed same thing yesterday with geronimo-gbean-deployer while
investigating why old timestamped jars/cars were being downloaded.
Building modules/geronimo-openejb-builder with mvn -U fixed the
problem. Thanks.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/24/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blevins just deployed the OpenEJB3 jars. So you may want to give it
another shot.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'svn up' openejb3
'svn up' geronimo trunk
mvn clean install openejb3 and trunk
Encountered the following error while starting the server. With all
the recent deploys going on, this may or may not be problem. Will
re-confirm after the other machine builds from scratch again.
11:26:09,947 INFO
Sorry for the false alarm !
The binary built from a clean repo is good !
We have a good server running on trunk.
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'svn up' openejb3
'svn up' geronimo trunk
mvn clean install openejb3 and trunk
Encountered the following error
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37982
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-46:
--
at first glance it looks like the problem is in your main ... the
Matt...
Last week you mentioned that after applying the DT-17 and DT-22 patches to
the 1.2 branch, you could not deploy/start the application. I looked into it
and it is because the DT-25 patch has not been applied. This patch removes
methods from the SLSB to JDBC interfaces that are not
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37983
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-46:
--
I've cleaned up a couple of items that you might want to grab from
Matt... minor typo... the patch is in DT-28...
Thanks...
Chris
On 1/24/07, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt...
Last week you mentioned that after applying the DT-17 and DT-22 patches to
the 1.2 branch, you could not deploy/start the application. I looked into
it and it is
Makes sense to me.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 23, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
+1 to adopt APR.
As 4.2 has a a different store format for some store
implementations (Kaha/rapid/quick) and we need to introduce a new
default store to maintain performance with persistent cursors, plus
Have you tried moving these 2 files to their rightful place, i.e. in
3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT directory?
container-3.0-incubating-20070123.025044-17.pom
container-3.0-incubating-20070123.025044-17.pom.sha1
Thanks
Anita
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the problem that Hernan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467095
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2757:
Can backwards compatibility be maintained in Geronimo by
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:48 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I think that Jira is working correctly as is. It should not show up
on the radar, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/geronimo, until
someone makes a commitment to fixing it for a particular release at
which time the issue gets assigned
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37984
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-46:
I don't know if this would be hard to implement, but it seems to me
No, I haven't attempted that yet. I'll give that a try a little later.
Right now I'm trying to see if building OpenEJB3 locally makes any
difference since I know of at least one person that isn't hitting this
problem but has built openejb3.
Thanks for the responses and ideas.
Joe
anita
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37986
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-46:
--
Albert - you are correct. Looking at the JMS 1.1 spec, it specifically
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37987
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-46:
I realise that C++ isn't Java but it seems that close and the
Thanks...send in your CLA you knucklehead :)
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt...
Last week you mentioned that after applying the DT-17 and DT-22
patches to the 1.2 branch, you could not deploy/start the
application. I looked into it and it is because the DT-25
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me in welcoming Chris.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome aboard Chris!
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new runtime
modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has accepted our
offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me in welcoming Chris.
Matt Hogstrom
If you're using WinXP or Win2003 without Cygwin or other shell changes,
try changing the following line in your M2_HOME\bin\mvn.bat -
if %OS%==Windows_NT @setlocal
to:
if %OS%==Windows_NT @setlocal enableextensions
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
No, I haven't attempted that yet. I'll give
Thanks Matt, et. al. I am really looking forward to this opportunity...
On 1/24/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome aboard Chris!
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new runtime
modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging
A, me matey, welcome aboard.
Rick
Joe Bohn wrote:
Welcome aboard Chris!
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of
Has anyone noticed that the JIRA Project Summary - Patch Available count
is not correct?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
Currently, it only shows 4 issues with patches, but there are -
1.1.2 - 1
1.2 - 1
1.x - 2
M2 - 4
I gave this a try but the results were the same. Building openejb3
locally didn't make any difference either.
At this point, I do not think this problem is a road-block for 2.0-M2.
My hunch is still that it's something in the pom or maven-metadata that
is causing a problem from Windows ...
Yeah I noticed this as well.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Has anyone noticed that the JIRA Project Summary - Patch Available
count is not correct?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
Currently, it only shows 4 issues with patches, but there are -
On 1/22/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
A couple of questions on the design/implementation:
1) Since the module builders will get an updated deployment
descriptors, in general, the annotation processors in Tomcat, Jetty,
Web services, EJB, etc. will just need to lookup the
Welcome Chris! Don't forget the pirate's code... ;-)
Paul
On 1/24/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Has anyone noticed that the JIRA Project Summary - Patch Available
count is not correct?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
Currently, it only shows 4 issues with patches, but there are -
1.1.2 - 1
1.2
Bean property 'limitMb' is not writable or has an invalid setter method
---
Key: AMQ-1138
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1138
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue
Congratulations! Welcome :)
On Jan 24, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me in
Welcome Chris!
Aaron
On 1/24/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me in welcoming
but not yet a ejb-jar.xml application.xml free deploy
On Jan 23, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
We can now have a ejb-jar.xml free deployment and openejb-jar.xml free
deployment.
-sachin
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On 1/22/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
A couple of questions on the design/implementation:
1) Since the module builders will get an updated deployment
descriptors, in general, the annotation processors in Tomcat, Jetty,
Web
As part of the discussion on G2728 relating to the Directory server and
LDAP-Demo sample -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2728
I'm wondering how others would like to see us handle optional server
components for 2.0, as we currently have some samples and plug-ins in
Welcome and Congrats Chris! Nice name... ;-)
chris
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me in
Plugin needs to implement MavenReport
-
Key: XBEAN-72
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-72
Project: XBean
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: maven-plugin
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37989
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-46:
--
Albert,
I've made some updates to trunk to do the automatic closing of
You mean geronimo-openejb free deploy.
The latest revisions do support ejb-jar.xml free deployments
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but not yet a ejb-jar.xml application.xml free deploy
On Jan 23, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
We can now have a
Build broken due to autoconf problem?
-
Key: AMQCPP-54
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-54
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.0
Environment:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37990
]
Wilfred Springer commented on AMQCPP-54:
Revision 499566
Build broken due to autoconf problem?
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37991
]
Wilfred Springer commented on AMQCPP-54:
Revision 499198 was working ok.
Build broken due to autoconf
Congrats Chris ! Welcome aboard !
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler updated AMQCPP-54:
-
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Build broken due to autoconf
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37993
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-54:
--
The build is not broken ... it's just a warning from autogen.sh. You
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37992
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-46:
Thanks very much. I'll try it out in our application tomorrow.
No I mean an ear with no applicaiton.xml and the ear contains a
ejbjar, with no ejb-jar.xml
On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
You mean geronimo-openejb free deploy.
The latest revisions do support ejb-jar.xml free deployments
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL
As I mentioned before, what I think needs to be done is rename
EjbConfigBuilder.isEjbAnnotatedModule() to isAnnotatedModule(JarFile
jar) and introduce this in the ModuleBuilder interface since the
other ModuleBuilders will need to implement it. EARConfigBuilder can
then invoke the method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2762.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Assignee: David Jencks
Applied to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37994
]
Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-46:
--
sure thing - grab trunk!
ActiveMQConnection doesn't propagate
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-54.
Resolution: Fixed
Since the build works, I'm considering it fixed.
Build broken due to
Hi
Has anyone been able to shed some light on this. I have been struggling with
the same problem all day?
I've tried just about everything short of reinstalling windows :). Not
really, but I tried locally compiling openejb
upgrading to openejb2 and openejb3. If I remove the dependency out of the
I did try this, but still have the same problem.
Andy
Alan D. Cabrera-2 wrote:
FYI, this built for me. I removed my local maven repo.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm trying it...
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Hernan
Jira is working correctly. We, the Geronimo team, added a status
called Patch Available. The whole point of the status Patch
Available is to indicate that a patch is ready to be picked up and
applied by a committer. Once it's picked up by a committer, there's
no point in tracking it as
Thanks Donald for migrating this discussion onto [EMAIL PROTECTED] I posted
some
feedback about option #1 in the JIRA you referenced. To sum up, I was
concerned about moving optional modules to an area called plugins,
since IMO that's a misnomer since optional modules aren't always
plugins and
On Jan 24, 2007, at 2:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+configuration
+modulePlan${project.build.directory}/
classes/META-INF/geronimo-application.xml/modulePlan
+/configuration
Its better to use
On Jan 24, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tomorrow, I'm going to try to remove the requirement to have a
geronimo-openejb.xml file.
Funny, just tried it out and a geronimo-openejb.xml free deployment
worked perfectly. The code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467208
]
Jason Warner commented on GERONIMO-2757:
I looked into this a little bit. I think it is feasible, but to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Mittler closed AMQCPP-46.
Resolution: Fixed
The example seems to be working fine now on OS X.
ActiveMQConnection
Need close() to propagate to child resources
Key: AMQCPP-55
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-55
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Bug
Components: CMS Impl
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on AMQCPP-55 started by Nathan Mittler.
Need close() to propagate to child resources
Key:
Only ejb modules are identified by scanning for annotations. IIRC
from the jee5 spec the following rules are used to identify modules:
Web - filenames ends with .war
Connector - filename ends with .rar
Persistence - contains META-INF/persistence.xml
EJB - scan for EJB annotations
AppClient -
On 1/23/07, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest development is being done on ActiveMQ 4.2 - however there
are a lot of improvements between 4.1 and 4.2 - namely:
1. Use of Java 5
2. Message cursors for persistent messages
3. Spooling of temporary messages id broker memory is full
Tomcat fails to accept certificate alias
Key: GERONIMO-2780
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2780
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Congrats Chris
--Manu
On 1/25/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Chris!
-- Shiva
On 1/25/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Chris ! Welcome aboard !
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of Chris'
Congratulations Chris !
Gianny
On 25/01/2007, at 5:53 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37997
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-46:
Still seeing a crash on Windows when running the example I provided
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Albert Strasheim reopened AMQCPP-46:
ActiveMQConnection doesn't propagate exception listener to underlying
connector
88 matches
Mail list logo
