On 2/6/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will introduce cyclic dependency between openejb and geronimo
build. David B. had an alternate solution.
Does it mean that M2 is not able to handle cyclic dependency in a
satisfactory manner?
I saw the comment of Dave B. where he
Hi All
Where to start ? Start from the Beginning-Allice in wonderland.
So I started from the beginning from v1.1.This is the deployment
plan-openejb.jar documentation for the geronimo v1.1.This document is
being part and partial with sample application section and used them to
describe the
Now GERONIMO-2798 patch is available on the JIRA. :-)
Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Hi All,
Currently I have been working with the GERONIMO-2798 mentioned in the
subject before submitting the patch I would like somebody to review
GERONIMO-2797 :-) .
Thanks,
Lasantha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lasantha Ranaweera updated GERONIMO-2798:
-
Attachment: GERONIMO-2798.patch
No more Axis2 only service builder. Now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470539
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2798:
---
May I ask for regenerating the patch in the top directory
--- Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will introduce cyclic dependency between openejb and geronimo
build. David B. had an alternate solution.
Does it mean that M2 is not able to handle cyclic dependency in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: appdoc.patch
appclientdoc.patch
alldoc.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: jettyconfigdoc.patch
connectordoc.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: moduledoc.patch
logindoc.patch
jettydoc.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: (was: jettydoc.patch)
Make geronimo schema files more human readable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: (was: moduledoc.patch)
Make geronimo schema files more human readable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: moduledoc.patch
logindoc.patch
jettydoc.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: securitydoc.patch
plugindoc.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Attachment: webdoc.patch
tomcatdoc.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470565
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2661:
Attached is the patch for improved documentation for all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2661:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: Wish List)
I just hit this as well.
-sachin
On Feb 5, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I can't get the Server trunk Rev503689 to build against a local
build of the latest OpenEJB3 code at Rev503514. Also noticed, that
the OpenEJB3 build is still using the Geronimo 1.2-beta artifacts
instead
Hello
Can someone please comment on JIRA 2660, Question is, it fine if I add
additional constaints in schema's. The reason why I ask this is adding an
additional constraints in schema files may lead to failure of some existing
user applications which doesn't follow the newly created constraints.
Hernan,
Still there is this classpath issue in my sample :-( . I am going to
change it to ant script rather than direct java command. Hopefully it
will remove most of the pains from users and my side too.
I will make the 1.2 sample according to that that and update the doc.
Hopefully I will
Please see comments in JIRA.
thanks,
dims
On 2/6/07, Lasantha Ranaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now GERONIMO-2798 patch is available on the JIRA. :-)
Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Hi All,
Currently I have been working with the GERONIMO-2798 mentioned in the
subject before submitting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470574
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2798:
Yes, please. Also, please don't all the unnecessary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2802.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Lin. Fixed in svn revision 504138.
-- dims
Axis2
Since we're not using the CMP generator of TranQL in 2.x I think we
can drop the Antlr reference as well. Any objections?
On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Tranql uses antlr, but there may be something else that does (maybe
spring).
-dain
On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:13 AM,
I think Chris B is putting some things together. Chris, is there any area of the app you are not planning to doc right away?
I'm just trying to avoid overlapping (yeah, weird, really weird, this is documentation that we are talking about ;-) )
Cheers!
Hernan
Kanchana Welagedara wrote:
Hi All
Forgot a file. Am in the middle of a build. could you please apply this patch?
Index: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/axis/AxisResponse.java
===
--- src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/axis/AxisResponse.java
(revision 503665)
+++
Yes, I'm hitting this too.
Joe
Sachin Patel wrote:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
VERY NICE GUYS !
Lot of info. It will be really great to have all these plans covered in 1.2 and
2.0
Cheers!
Hernan
Kanchana Welagedara wrote:
Hi All
Where to start ? Start from the Beginning-Allice in wonderland.
So I started from the beginning from v1.1.This is the deployment
Cool, pls check the 1.1 version because it was giving me some hard time too.
Cheers!
Hernan
Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Hernan,
Still there is this classpath issue in my sample :-( . I am going to
change it to ant script rather than direct java command. Hopefully it
will remove most of the
Haven't been able to get a full deploy of anything (tried daytrader
and the v2 itests), but things are starting to look good with the
converter. The basic conversion is happening and conversion of
things like environment and abstract name queries are definitely
getting ported over. Still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470634
]
Lasantha Ranaweera commented on GERONIMO-2798:
--
Dims,
I understood the fist problem will fix it in
You can download following files from
http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repository/org.apache.axis2/jars/;
and store in local repo
.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/SNAPSHOT:
_
bytes | name
_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470644
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on GERONIMO-2798:
Lasantha,
If you specify just the axis2-jaxws ,does it
Before you do that, I'd make sure that antlr isn't in the server
repo. That way you will know that there isn't another library using
it. Antlr is very popular after all.
-dain
On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:54 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Since we're not using the CMP generator of TranQL in 2.x I
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Haven't been able to get a full deploy of anything (tried daytrader
and the v2 itests), but things are starting to look good with the
converter. The basic conversion is happening and conversion of
things like environment and abstract name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-22:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Affects Version/s: 2.0
Applied changes to
Hi there, for the past few times, I didn't have any luck in building
Geronimo using just mvn or mvn install. I had to use
'-Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dmaven.itest.skip=true' to skip both the test and
itest. This is the latest error I saw when I forgot to turn off the
test/itest.:-)
Feb 6, 2007
This is avail here -
http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository2/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/SNAP
SHOT/
And the ws.zones.apache.org repo is specified in root pom.xml:
repository
idaxis2-m2-repo/id
nameAxis2 M2 Repository/name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-22.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Set publichQuotePriceChange to true in ejb-jar.xml
JAXWS build failure due to missing axis2-jaxws-api-SNAPSHOT.jar
---
Key: GERONIMO-2803
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2803
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
update myfaces-1.2-SNAPSHOT jars
Key: GERONIMO-2804
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2804
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
into loan-broker-bpel sample - javax.jbi.messaging.MessagingException: Do not
understand pattern: null
--
Key: SM-833
URL:
Yep, it took several build attempts to get all of the needed files from
ws.zones.apache.org
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
This is avail here -
http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository2/org/apache/axis2/axis2-jaxws-api/SNAP
SHOT/
And the ws.zones.apache.org repo is specified in root pom.xml:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-28.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
1.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-2803.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Seems it was a network or server problem - it took several build
Hi,
I'm trying to turn on some logging in the server. So I added a line to
the server-log4j.properties, e.g.:
log4j.logger.org.apache.geronimo.cxf=DEBUG
then I started the server with -Dlog4j.debug=true to ensure the right
properties file is being read and my logger settings are set:
log4j:
Hi All,
there is a new wiki entry: Apache Geronimo With A Monitor Component
The purpose of this article is to show the possibilities of server-side
monitoring using Geronimo, a JavaTM 2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE)
application server. Monitoring an application server from inside saves
Why isn't axis using the normal apache snapshot repo?
It really sucks to have to add new repos to pick up a small set of
artifacts... especially when that repo starts to cause transient
build failures... :-(
--jason
On Feb 6, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
This is avail here -
add tribes clustering support for tomcat
Key: GERONIMO-2805
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2805
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Hi,
The company I work for wants me to start contributing to this project, I am
looking at the following license agreement, is this the agreement that needs
to be submitted? I know its for individual but was wondering if there is
another one for a company employee?
I think we probably need to submit a corp agreement, sorry I didn't read
further but was excited that they wanted to make this my full time job.
Don
On 2/6/07, Don Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The company I work for wants me to start contributing to this project, I
am looking at the
Is this on trunk ? We don't have any itests in the regular build of
trunk. So that config option (with or without) shouldn't be doing
anything to you.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/6/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there, for the past few times, I didn't have any luck in building
Geronimo using
Hi Don,
Glad to hear your interested in Apache Geronimo (or your company is
as the case may be ;-)
To provide a little context for contributing to Apache Geronimo.
Folks that are working on the project are viewed in the context of
their individual contributions as opposed to the
The Corp agreement is really for code donations. The CLA is for
individual contributors.
On Feb 6, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Don Hill wrote:
I think we probably need to submit a corp agreement, sorry I didn't
read further but was excited that they wanted to make this my full
time job.
Don
On
Yeah this is on trunk... if we don't have any itests (good to know that)
then using '-Dmaven.test.skip=true' must have made a difference. I still
cannot build Geronimo without this option.
Lin
-Original Message-
From: Prasad Kashyap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06,
AFAIK you only need to fill that out and send it in when you become a
committer on an Apache project. But you are always free to submit
patches, fill out problem reports and participate in community
discussions. :-)
At the time when the community elects to grant you commit then you
will
Did also update the following lines in server-log4j.properties -
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE
log4j.appender.FILE.threshold=INFO
to be -
log4j.rootLogger=DEBUG, CONSOLE, FILE
log4j.appender.FILE.threshold=DEBUG
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to turn on some logging in
Hi Don,
Welcome, and we look forward to your contributions.
How about an introduction? ;-)
Jeff
Don Hill wrote:
Hi,
The company I work for wants me to start contributing to this project, I
am looking at the following license agreement, is this the agreement
that needs to be submitted? I
I was under the impression that if your employer owns your code
contributions (as IIUC is the case in most of the US) then you need a
CCLA as well as an ICLA. I'm definitely not an expert though.
david jencks
On Feb 6, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Corp agreement is really
Matt,
Thanks for the info, I am under the constraints of our legal dept., as soon
as they wave there magic wand I will send an introduction and start as you
outlined in you email.
Thanks!!
Don
On 2/6/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Don,
Glad to hear your interested in Apache
Yep, I missed that. Thanks a lot!
Jarek
On 2/6/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did also update the following lines in server-log4j.properties -
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE
log4j.appender.FILE.threshold=INFO
to be -
log4j.rootLogger=DEBUG, CONSOLE, FILE
Lin, I was seeing this problem intermittently when geronimo used
tomcat 6.0.2 so I disabled the unit test and planned to investigate
later. Then after upgrading geronimo's tomcat version to 6.0.8 I
could not recreate the problem so I reenabled the unit test. I
believe you will find that the
On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:06 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This will introduce cyclic dependency between openejb and geronimo
build. David B. had an alternate solution.
Does it mean that M2 is
On Feb 4, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi again Dave, after your recommendation below to do all the
annotation discovery during the installModule phase of deployment
ClassFinder is working much better for me. I do still have another
scenario I'd appreciate some advice on. It
Hi All,
I've been putting some content in the v2.0 documentation based on what we had
on previous releases (basically following the same structure)
There are a TON of new things already in or ready to get in Geronimo v2.0. I
need some help to put these updates together, some of the stuff
On 2/6/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious... but why is 'bin' being ignored?
I had not given it much thought before having committed it. I just
copied the setting from some other directories. Shall I remove bin
from svn:ignore? Perhaps there's an explanation for it, but I
On 2/6/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also disable the unit test again but since I'm not able to
recreate the failure can you describe your environment (OS, java
version, etc)? Also it would be a big help if you could provide the
contents of target/surefire-reports for a
On 2/6/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there, for the past few times, I didn't have any luck in building
Geronimo using just mvn or mvn install. I had to use
'-Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dmaven.itest.skip=true' to skip both the test and
itest. This is the latest error I saw when I forgot
On 2/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Tue Feb 6 05:37:11 2007
New Revision: 504135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=504135
Log:
don't attempt to processes non-ejb modules (take 2)
...
} catch (OpenEJBException e) {
+if
I think the ConnectException you see on stdout is actually a separate
problem, but since I can't recreate I'm not totally sure. I provided
a patch to tomcat for that problem, see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2747
I'm hoping that the real culprit behind the unit test failure
On 2/6/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the ConnectException you see on stdout is actually a separate
problem, but since I can't recreate I'm not totally sure. I provided
a patch to tomcat for that problem, see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2747
I'm hoping
Hi Paul,
I am using winxp pro and sun 1.5 jdk (1.5.0_10-b02). I am in the middle of
another build but I will provide the target/surefire-reports directory
whenever I hit this error again.:-)
Thanks,
Lin
-Original Message-
From: Paul McMahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
On 2/6/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't I do that before or Paul meant to have asked about something
else? Anyway, here it goes.
yep indeed you did, my mistake, caused by working on too many things
at once :-) Thanks, this information will help me debug the problem
You are right - that won't change much:-) Seeing a different error now:
[INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Unresolved compilation problem:
CXF: initial service-ref support
Key: GERONIMO-2807
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2807
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2807:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2807.patch
CXF: initial service-ref support
On 2/6/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep indeed you did, my mistake, caused by working on too many things
at once :-) Thanks, this information will help me debug the problem
further. btw, I disabled the test case in trunk so those affected
can continue to compile with unit
On 2/6/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right - that won't change much:-) Seeing a different error now:
Can't be! Wipe out the org/apache/geronimo and org/apache/openejb
directories in the m2 local repo of yours and start it over. It worked
for me and so should for you.
Jacek
Yeah I did start with a clean c:\.m2 repo and I constantly got this error.
I was able to build Geronimo this am and I didn't make any code change in
between (only run maven -o eclipse:eclipse, updated 2 pom.xml files and
refreshed trunk).
I am rechecking out a fresh trunk and trying it again
Hi All,
I'm updating the existing Geronimo documentation to v2.0, here is the link.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/documentation.html
Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v2.0 first? Are there any topics from previous releases you guys don't want to see
Okay I am able to build Geronimo now with a clean repo and a fresh checkout
of trunk. Thanks, Lin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacek
Laskowski
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:12 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: build
Hi Lin,
Currently there is a problem in the Axis2 integration. The bunch of
dependencies are missing in the config/axis2/pom.xml file. It gives this
problem to me too. Hopefully I will fix it today with the common
JAXWSBuilder. Also we need to add their dependencies to the pom.xml file
in the G
Jee5 makes extensive use of Global JNDI for references.
Specifically, the following use Global JNDI:
@Resource.mappedName()
This mapped name is often a global JNDI name, but may be a name of
any form.
@EJB.mappedName()
This mapped name is often a global JNDI name, but may be a name of
Appears that 'org.apache.yoko:yoko-rmi-spec:jar:1.0-incubating-M2-
SNAPSHOT' is missing.
Can someone from the Yoko team publish the latest 1.0-incubating-M2-
SNAPSHOT snapshots please?
snip
[INFO]
[INFO]
Notice the strange message:
1) org.apache.geronimo.configs:client-corba-yoko:car:1.2-SNAPSHOT
2) org.apache.yoko:yoko-rmi-impl:jar:1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT
3) org.apache.yoko:yoko-rmi-spec:jar:1.0-incubating-
M2-20070206.145504-10
The version changes from a SNAPSHOT to a
Weird... I think I must have checked yoko-rmi, not yoko-rmi-spec, as
I do see plenty of 1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT artifacts in here:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
yoko/yoko-rmi-spec/1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT/
Erg... wtf... how can we fix this?
Offhand I'd guess this is related to the problem we had with the
openejb container pom recently haven't kept up with whether the
maven guys have done anything about it.
Has everyone voted for
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2796
?
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:22
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Offhand I'd guess this is related to the problem we had with the
openejb container pom recently haven't kept up with whether the
maven guys have done anything about it.
Has everyone voted for
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2796
I put a watch on it before, just voted... will comment on it
shortly... though my wii is calling to me ;-)
--jason
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Offhand I'd guess this is related to the problem we had with the
openejb container pom recently haven't kept up with
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Offhand I'd guess this is related to the problem we had with the
openejb container pom recently haven't kept up with whether
the maven guys have done anything about it.
Has everyone
So, does the yoko project need to be updated to use a ${version}
property to prevent the timestamp-build from getting used in
dependency elements?
I remember you updated openejb, but I'm not sure about any of the
other projects we are using snapshot versions for...
--jason
On Feb 6,
Eh, probably not... though in general I don't really like using
svn:ignore, but prefer using global-ignores in ~/.subversion/config.
I usually have:
global-ignores = *.log *.save *.o *.lo *.la #*# .*~
*~ .#* .DS_Store build dist target *.ipr *.iml
*.iws .project .classpath .settings
I had to build yoko :(
-dain
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Weird... I think I must have checked yoko-rmi, not yoko-rmi-spec,
as I do see plenty of 1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT artifacts in here:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
We need to fix our tools. There is no way we can go to every project
and say use our custom geronimo ${version} property instead of the
standard ${pom.version}, oh and by the way you can't use maven
release tools anymore.
-dain
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, does
:-(
I'm fine to either always build a set of external components (maybe
just openejb, tranql, yoko), or always rely on the dependencies
deployed to a remote repo... but switching between the two isn't
really a viable option from a build automation standpoint.
I don't think this is
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:21 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:44 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On 1/9/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 7:28 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into integrating CXF
I'm in the process of re doing them for 1.2. Will update the docs as soon as
possible.
Regards
Karthiga
On 2/6/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VERY NICE GUYS !
Lot of info. It will be really great to have all these plans covered in
1.2 and 2.0
Cheers!
Hernan
Kanchana Welagedara
I agree... just its not really been that easy to get some of these
problems in maven fixed and get a new release out, so we have been
forced to dance around the problem.
Its been months now since we have this staged build to get around
problems loading a maven extension which gets built in
Maybe we need to bribe the Maven team with beer or something...
--jason
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
We need to fix our tools. There is no way we can go to every
project and say use our custom geronimo ${version} property
instead of the standard ${pom.version}, oh
I strongly suggest you do not attempt to document the geronimo-
openejb.xml plan in 2.0 yet as it has not been finalized and is
likely to change drastically.
-dain
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Karthiga Ratnam wrote:
I'm in the process of re doing them for 1.2. Will update the docs
as soon
Does anyone know if it is a recommended practice to use a pom as a
dependency?
Thanks
Anita
--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2007, at 6:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Offhand I'd guess this is related to the problem we had with the
openejb container pom
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
