Hi Guillaume,
Sorry, I was already out of office when you sent the mail... I saw that
you did a fix, and I'll check if it works for me. Thanks!
The problem first occurred in one of my own test cases, but then I
reproduced it in the SecuredBroker test case by instantiating a Logger
there right
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38554
]
Juergen Mayrbaeurl commented on SM-847:
---
Yes. This is a problem for JDK 1.4 compat.
Old version of xml-apis in
Eric Dofonsou has been voted in as a committer
on Apache ServiceMix some time ago, but there were
some problems with his CLA. Jim said it is now filed,
so, I kindly request root to create an account for
Eric Dofonsou and grant him access to ServiceMix
(incubator).
username : ewrick
forward
Hi Everyone,
I have recently been mostly successful (read: there are a few
outstanding issues) in getting ServiceMix 3.0.1 working with WebSphere
6.1 in WAR format and I am wanting to contribute the results back to the
project.
I was thinking of creating a wiki page detailing all the appropriate
I just dropped this dependency. It is indeed not needed.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/02/2007, at 5:39 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
When building with a clean repo, trunk's bootstrap stage is barfing
building the geronimo-maven-plugin because of missing car:
Thanks :-)
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:54 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
I just dropped this dependency. It is indeed not needed.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/02/2007, at 5:39 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
When building with a clean repo, trunk's bootstrap stage is
barfing building the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474122
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2816:
I think there's a lot of good code in these patches but I think
So I think now is a good time as any to bring up discussion around
our Eclipse Tooling delivery for Geronimo 2.0. It would be great if
we can provide a tooling driver for this milestone unlike last so
that we can provide our users and end to end solution. The last time
I tried to work on
Pls give it another try to the WS sample if you have the time. I got it to work
last time but I was getting some additional messages when running the client.
If you can verify it again go ahead, update the title and append the (1.2 Ok)
Cheers!
Hernan
Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Hi Karthiga,
Sounds great Sachin. When you have something ready for us to look at
I'll grab the latest WTP and try things out.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 2/19/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think now is a good time as any to bring up discussion around our
Eclipse Tooling delivery for Geronimo
So, we voted this monster in and accepted the code base. At this
point, per Geir's note in this thread Noted below:
Here's the process :
1) Contributor offers code *Complete*
2) Project decides to accept or reject code. Formally, this is
the PMC, but everyone should chime in.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reopened GERONIMO-2816:
-
Reopened till patch is committed
@EJB/@EJBs annotation support
During the vote Jeff and I volunteered to help mentor this code
contribution. Like you pointed out, the process outlined in Geir's
note has the contributor replacing the copyright statements and not
the recipient, which makes sense to me from a legal perspective. Once
that is in place I would
Hi David, Let's discuss when you get a chance please--still trying to understand
your proposed arrangement. Also, re-opened this jira--didn't follow the correct
protocol.
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
David Jencks (JIRA) wrote:
[
I agree here and just let me know anything I can do to help as well.
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
During the vote Jeff and I volunteered to help mentor this code
contribution. Like you pointed out, the process outlined in Geir's
note has the contributor replacing the copyright statements and not
Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/19/2007 06:47:45 AM:
So, we voted this monster in and accepted the code base. At this
point, per Geir's note in this thread Noted below:
Here's the process :
1) Contributor offers code *Complete*
2) Project decides to accept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2850:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2850.patch
CXF: initial web service support for EJBs
CXF: initial web service support for EJBs
-
Key: GERONIMO-2850
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2850
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular
On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
So, we voted this monster in and accepted the code base. At this
point, per Geir's note in this thread Noted below:
Here's the process :
1) Contributor offers code *Complete*
2) Project decides to accept or reject code.
On Feb 15, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I propose the following coding standards (taken from the Geronimo
web site)
which are actually the most common in ServiceMix code base:
http://cwiki.apache.org/SM/coding-standards.html
Does anyone want to modify / add / change something
Geronimo - Monday, February 19, 2007
0 Patches in RTC
NOTE: This email is generated and does not constitute and offical
vote or vote result. All official voting is done on the dev list.
If you do not see your issue here, click the Begin RTC Review
link under the Available Workflow Actions
Yes, i can help with the ip-clearance.
-- dims
On 2/19/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
So, we voted this monster in and accepted the code base. At this
point, per Geir's note in this thread Noted below:
Here's the process :
On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Yes, i can help with the ip-clearance.
Thanks Dims!
--kevan
Thanks!
Jarek
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done, please verify it builds ;-)
--jason
On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Yes.
Jarek
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just turns stuff off until it can be fixed?
--jason
On Feb
Added an xml here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/
When there is an update to that doc, Anyone of us can update the doc
and re-publish the html. Someone needs to shepherd the process though.
See the items on the list for TODO's.
thanks,
dims
On
Great news!!! can't wait to give it try ;-)
Cheers!
Hernan
Sachin Patel wrote:
So I think now is a good time as any to bring up discussion around our
Eclipse Tooling delivery for Geronimo 2.0. It would be great if we can
provide a tooling driver for this milestone unlike last so that we can
I have noticed a few issues with openejb and geronimo and I was
wondering what is the status of these problems or if I'm doing
something wrong. I think some of these might already be known issues:
1) Redeployment of the same EJB fails with:
Deployer operation failed:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474243
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-2849:
---
Btw, please run dos2unix on modules/geronimo-jaxws module after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-25.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
1.2
Hi,
I would be very grateful if somebody could review/commit the following
patches before Wednesday:
1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2849 (app client test for ws)
2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2850 (initial ejb
support for ws)
Thanks,
Jarek
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474250
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2804:
r509288 completes integration of MyFaces into Geronimo. I'll
On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Matt, committers can certainly help. However, either an officer
(you) or an ASF member (Dims or Geir) will need to fill out and
submit the IP Clearance form -- http://incubator.apache.org/ip-
clearance/ip-clearance-template.html. Also,
On 2/19/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed a few issues with openejb and geronimo and I was
wondering what is the status of these problems or if I'm doing
something wrong. I think some of these might already be known issues:
1) Redeployment of the same EJB fails with:
I am seeing this during shutdown using bin\shutdown. I had to use ^c to stop
the server.
C:\x\geronimo\g2.0\assemblies\geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0-SNAPSHOTbin\shutdown
Using GERONIMO_BASE:
C:\anita\geronimo\g2.0\assemblies\geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0-SNAPSHO
T
Using GERONIMO_HOME:
I have written a new css for the web site today.
You can preview it at
http://cwiki.apache.org/SM/orchestration-with-jsr181.html
What do people think about switching to it ?
I think there are a few things to tweak for IE ..
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
It will be great to get some help there too. Administration is a huge topic
though.
I will start another thread to hold the discussion there and leave this one for
the JMS config issue.
Cheers!
Hernan
Karthiga Ratnam wrote:
Oh yeah! There are plenty of areas to work on. I'm working on the
Folks, we'll hopefully be branching some time this week. This is a friendly
(and weekly) reminder that without your input this document will starve. Pls
chime in, send comments or update the doc directly, here is the link.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/whats-new-in-geronimo-v2-m2.html
On 2/19/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written a new css for the web site today.
You can preview it at
http://cwiki.apache.org/SM/orchestration-with-jsr181.html
What do people think about switching to it ?
I think there are a few things to tweak for IE ..
Looks great,
- Continuing the discussion for topics to cover in the Geronimo v2.0
Documentation - Administration section -
The idea is to use Geronimo's existing documentation as a topic guideline
adding user input for new topics. So, pls chime in with the topics you would
like to see covered.
It would be
LDAP view in the console
Key: GERONIMO-2851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2851
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Jarek Gawor
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 509369 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070219/build-1800.log
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-el_1.0_spec
Hey Jason,
I'm trying to catch up with the News/blog-posts on GMOxSITE as part of the web
site update. I created a few tests (added News) but these posts take forever to
show up. Any suggestions?
Anyway, do you have any idea how could we port the *News* we have on the live
site?
Cheers!
Sure, that's fine :-)
On 2/20/07, Grant Mcdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have recently been mostly successful (read: there are a few
outstanding issues) in getting ServiceMix 3.0.1 working with WebSphere
6.1 in WAR format and I am wanting to contribute the results back to the
News is one of those dynamic bits which won't get updated unless the
page which uses the macro is re-rendered. I just made a minor change
to index and it picked up the new news.
What we need to do is have a period full export of the site to keep
these more dynamic bits updated. I'm not
Can you find out where the ActiveMQ folks got that sexy box image
from? I'd *love* to have a nice box like that (g-styled of course)
for our page too :-)
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hey Jason,
I'm trying to catch up with the News/blog-posts on GMOxSITE as
Oh, I wasn't talking about the autoexport. Native Confluence News, up to 4 mins
to show up with the {blog-posts} macro.
any idea for moving the old news?
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
News is one of those dynamic bits which won't get updated unless the
page which uses the macro is
you mean the shaded frame box? I think the difficult part will be the resizing
in the css. Creating the graphics should be pretty simple.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Can you find out where the ActiveMQ folks got that sexy box image from?
I'd *love* to have a nice box like that
No, the shrinkwrap box:
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-410-release.data/
activemq-4.1-box-reflection.png
I'm wondering if someone has a blender project, or some other
modeling tool which they used to render this puppy.
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Native confluence news? Huh?
Moving the old news... is the painful process of converting html to
wiki... and AFAIK there is no way to backdate the content, so will
have to put a note in the news stating which date it was really
from. Unless you want to hack the DB... which I don't
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the shrinkwrap box:
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-410-release.data/
activemq-4.1-box-reflection.png
I'm wondering if someone has a blender project, or some other
modeling tool which they used to render this puppy.
Hiram created
On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the shrinkwrap box:
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-410-release.data/
activemq-4.1-box-reflection.png
I'm wondering if someone has a blender project, or some other
modeling tool
IMO, I think we should drop the top-tabs, and just implement a nav
similar to what activemq has for the breadcumbs - links bar between
the header and content.
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
you mean the shaded frame box? I think the difficult part will be
the
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the shrinkwrap box:
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-410-release.data/
activemq-4.1-box-reflection.png
I'm wondering if someone
Oh Hiram... can I have the Blender project you used to make the AMQ
box graphic please?
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do we still need this space?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxMoinMoin/Home
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
you mean the shaded frame box? I think the difficult part will be
the resizing in the css. Creating the graphics should be pretty
Um, anyone know if Pier is still maintaining AutoExport? If not...
we may want to simply fork this puppy and make the changes we want to
the plugin for using on the ASF confluence.
Has anyone talked to Pier recently about getting changes/fixes into
the plugin?
--jason
On Feb 19, 2007,
I'm in for covering the Adminstration series of articles. If no one is
working on it , I would like to cover the areas under Adminstering the
Apache Geronimo Server.
Any other topics I can cover??
Regards
Karthiga
On 2/20/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Continuing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-33.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
1.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-29.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
1.2
I've already updated three sample apps. Will look into the WS sample
today
Regards
Karthiga
On 2/19/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pls give it another try to the WS sample if you have the time. I got it to
work last time but I was getting some additional messages when running
Hi David, I haven't applied your patch yet but will do that first thing in the
morning--I've been looking at all the Naming Builders. So based on the current
set of Naming Builders we have in Geronimo it looks like we should have to
support the following references via annotations:
ejb-ref
Test Case to Axis2WebServiceContainer
-
Key: GERONIMO-2852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2852
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lasantha Ranaweera updated GERONIMO-2852:
-
Attachment: GERONIMO-2852.patch
Test Case to Axis2WebServiceContainer
I looked into the WS Sample and it still gives the warning message. Lasantha
do you have an alternative for this?
Regards
Karthiga
On 2/20/07, Karthiga Ratnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already updated three sample apps. Will look into the WS sample
today
Regards
Karthiga
On
64 matches
Mail list logo
