Thanks for the fix Hernan.I was doing these updates and Yesterday I
noticed that these not being available on line.I hope that I can
continue to work on line in G2 version and add more pages.
Regards
Kanchana
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 09:40 -0400, Hernan Cunico wrote:
> Kanchana,
> Between today and
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-04-03 09:56:37 -0400 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3186:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3186.diff
ta-da
> Show schema names along with table names in the db
"Interesting" is a bit strong for this simple change :-)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3186
thanks
david jencks
On May 23, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds interesting. Can you post it to JIRA so we can look at it?
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
While trying to un
Show schema names along with table names in the db portlet
--
Key: GERONIMO-3186
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3186
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Sounds interesting. Can you post it to JIRA so we can look at it?
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
While trying to understand what was going on with jpa I changed the db
viewer portlet locally so that when you list tables, it shows the schema
for each table along with its name. Is anyone else in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-2773:
---
Attachment: geronimo-2773.patch
I have attached the patch that will allow the user
PostConstruct/PreDeploy specified in xml can have class default to component's
type.
Key: GERONIMO-3185
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3185
Proj
If we can specify different schemas on the embedded Derby I think it would be
useful to have them listed.
It would also be cool if the portlet could list all those DB's that have been
defined via a DB connection pool. I know, this is totally different story.
Cheers!
Hernan
David Jencks wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498418
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3175:
URL lookups get new instance in rev 541113. AFAIK everything wor
While trying to understand what was going on with jpa I changed the
db viewer portlet locally so that when you list tables, it shows the
schema for each table along with its name. Is anyone else
interested in this or should I toss it?
thanks
david jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498412
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3175:
Made connection factories serializable (theoretically) by making
I don't think we can even if we wanted to. Their annotation jar is a
random collection of annotation classes from various specs:
javax/annotation/Generated.class
javax/annotation/PostConstruct.class
javax/annotation/PreDestroy.class
javax/annotation/Resource$AuthenticationType.class
javax/anno
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498353
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-2846:
---
check in the current jaxws-calculator sample in case someone wants to work
I haven't investigated the actual history but I think our annotation
api jar was implemented independently of theirs so I am very
reluctant to discard ours for theirs.
thanks
david jencks
On May 23, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
IIRC the Tomcat has some non-compliant spec jars.
I'll run the signature tests on the servlet, jsp, and el spec jars.
If I encounter any problems then I'll work with tomcat to get them
fixed before replacing geronimo's versions.
I'll also report the problem you found with annotations-api.jar,
thanks for pointing that out.
Best wishes,
P
IIRC the Tomcat has some non-compliant spec jars. Specifically, the
annotations-api.jar is not correct... it has javax/persistence/
PersistenceContext$PersistenceContextType.class, but that class is
not an inner class and should be
javax.persistence.PersistenceContextType
I'm guessing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498325
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149:
---
Its been broken in previous milestones as we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498322
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149:
--
What can we do about it? Shall we reco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498318
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149:
---
This is due to a bug in WTP..
https://bugs.
EAR deployment fails with Eclipse 3.3M7
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-149
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: eclips
On 5/23/07, Eduardo Burgos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, I'm not thinking about removing the other way, it's just to have this
as
an option.
About the custom service analyzer, for example, lets say we have a
component
that is not supported by this team and we have no possibility to access
it's
No, I'm not thinking about removing the other way, it's just to have this as
an option.
About the custom service analyzer, for example, lets say we have a component
that is not supported by this team and we have no possibility to access it's
source code and I still need to build a service unit for
no, I didn't read the spec.. I just assumed it was optional or
something, rather then a spec violation. No I don't think it is
currently using it.
thx
-sachin
On May 23, 2007, at 11:33 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Have you checked the specs on the disconnected deployment manager?
IIRC by s
Have you checked the specs on the disconnected deployment manager?
IIRC by spec it can't deploy, distribute, undeploy, redeploy. or
do anything except give you access to the DConfigBeans.
In particular the offline deployer should not be trying to use a
disconnected deployment manager.
Sure, sounds good !
What kind of custom service analyser are thinking about ?
Or is that for non servicemix components ?
But I don't think we should remove the other way, which work
well for servicemix components.
Btw, such discussions about enhancing ServiceMix should really
take place on the d
Geronimo's servlet 2.5, jsp 2.1, and EL 1.0 specs were copied from
tomcat6. This was done because geronimo needed them for JEE5 but
the tomcat team had not made those spec jars available in a maven
repo. See discussion at http://tinyurl.com/yvtj3f
Since that time there have been some co
It is just one less jar from Sun and our assembly.:-) Sure, if I ever
do that, I'll make sure it didn't break anything (at least tck) first.:)
Lin
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 5/22/07, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw that we still use sun's jaxws-api in root pom.xml, jee-spec
pom.xml
Kanchana,
Between today and yesterday I found you created/updated the following pages.
- Apache Geronimo v2.0: Deployment Plans (page created - empty)
- Apache Geronimo v1.2: geronimo-ra.xml (page edited)
- Apache Geronimo v1.2: geronimo-application.xml (page edited)
- Apache Geronimo v1.1: geron
The distribute method of the DisconnectedDeploymentManager returns an
IllegalStateException. Should this still remain a restriction with
the new offline deployment support? Or is there much more additional
work required to support offline deployment through JSR88?
thx
-sachin
The parent page settings for the pages you created are wrong, I'll fix them and
do a new export, that should fix it.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 5/23/07, Kanchana Welagedara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have done some document upgrades for G 1.2 and G 2.0 in the
confluence.Se
On 5/22/07, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw that we still use sun's jaxws-api in root pom.xml, jee-spec
pom.xml, and a few webservices test.
javax.xml.ws
jaxws-api
I was under the impression both CXF and Axis2 use axis2's jaxws-api. If
so
On 5/23/07, Kanchana Welagedara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have done some document upgrades for G 1.2 and G 2.0 in the
confluence.Seems those are not appeared on line but the changes are
there when I got in to the confluence.What's going on?
I guess it takes some time before it's sync'ed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-146.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Assignee: Sachin Pa
Hi
I have done some document upgrades for G 1.2 and G 2.0 in the
confluence.Seems those are not appeared on line but the changes are
there when I got in to the confluence.What's going on?
Regards
Kanchana
Hi,
Really Sorry :) forgot to include geronimo-dev list in the cc after
saying it should be tracked on both the lists. Please respond to this
mail from now on as it has both the lists included.
Regards
Manu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May
36 matches
Mail list logo
