Sure, at 3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST
On 9/3/07, rs d [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do we have a chat today...
please float the details across
On 8/31/07, Brian O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(+1)
sure thing, i'll join from the beach.
-brian
On 8/31/07, Eric Dofonsou [EMAIL
It sounds like there is an agreement on the following hour:
On Sep 3, 2007, at 10:10 AM, rs d wrote:
3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Camel InOut support
---
Key: SM-1048
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1048
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.2
Reporter: Dejan Predovic
Attachments:
Wrong mailing list...
---BeginMessage---
* Now talking on #servicemix
gnodet good morning/afternoon/evening/night everybody
terry Hi from Leeds
gnodet who's listening here ?
pbzdyl hi, this is piotr
gertv I will be in half an hour or so, after dinner
gertv I'll quickly read the logs at that
On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Getting 2.0.1 out the door was a great step and now might be a good
time to start discussing where we want geronimo to head next. Here
are some ideas I've had or think are important. If I were to try
to write actual sentences about all of
IMO, we need to ween ourselves off of the local repository module
completely... and avoid future use of any such local repository.
When I (er we) did the main Maven 2 conversion I added some of these
local modules as short-term work arounds to problems... there was no
intention of leaving
On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Anything more than 6 to 8 groupings could cause chaos (just like at
our current release process which takes weeks to get everything
voted and released...)
After cleanup of server to move the samples to /samples and
ApacheDS to /plugins, we
On 9/3/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, we need to ween ourselves off of the local repository module
completely... and avoid future use of any such local repository.
+1
When I (er we) did the main Maven 2 conversion I added some of these
local modules as short-term work
On Aug 6, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Another thought (now that I had some lunch)
What if we create a builders/deployers grouping, which contained
the modules and configs needed for each builder, like -
deployers
myfaces
modules
On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I certainly agree with your goal but am less sure about your
proposed naming and organization. Also from looking at your list
it took me a couple minutes to figure out what is removed from
Oh, one more thing which I think is also critical path for the health
of the server and its community...
LOGGING REFORM
We've talked about this here and there, most folks agree we need to
reform our logging usage... but so far its yet to happen. It is a
fairly simple task IMO, but its
On Aug 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Scenario 1:
server/support/trunk
server/framework/trunk
server/plugins/trunk/ --- jee5, non-jee5, samples etc are
all here together.
I'm not really convinced we need to have this intermediate server
tree right now. IMO
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0
(to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release):
The deployable zip file is here:
http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/g-eclipse-plugin-2.0.0-deployable.zip
The current svn location is here:
I've committed what I have so far:
- use new plugin schema
- generate geronimo-plugin.xml files for each car from pom.xml
- generate plan environment section from explicitly listed car-maven-
plugin configuration instead of from maven dependencies. We check
that each dependency listed in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524563
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3453:
Base work done in rev 572395. However we now have to provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524564
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3330:
Most of this is done in rev 572395 but the cli and console
OpenEJB trunk at 572396
Geronimo Revision: 572398 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070903/build-1400.log
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'com.agical.rmock:rmock:pom:2.0.0-rc-6' from
repository apache-incubator
FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1
I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update
this puppy... IMO this type of information is better captured in a
wiki page, though its
I just rand into some really old-arse stuff in the wiki, and I didn't
really look to hard to find more, but I started adorning stuff that
is growing stale with:
{warning:title=Stale Content}
The content of this page is growing stale and may or may not contain
relevant, useful or correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller_maven_ant_task_070902_0.patch
OpenEJB trunk at 572433
Geronimo Revision: 572434 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070903/build-1800.log
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'com.agical.rmock:rmock:pom:2.0.0-rc-6' from
repository apache-incubator
at http://people.apache.org/
~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070903/build-1800.log
[WARNING] Unable to get resource 'com.agical.rmock:rmock:pom:2.0.0-
rc-6' from repository apache-incubator (http://people.apache.org/
repo/m2-incubating-repository/)
Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/agical
Thanks for the heads up. I had a problem earlier with a JBoss file
being processed and deleted all of these files in my local image and
totally forgot about it until now.
How about we release 1.2? Its probably about time.
On Aug 31, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All...
I get the same error David after an SVN up and rebuild. I'm at 572428.
On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm not getting this error, can anyone else reproduce it? It does
appear to be related to my last commit...
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL
Thanks for the CWiki ...
On Sep 3, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1
I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update
this puppy...
Revisit using Modello for the gshell-layout xml handling instead of XStream
---
Key: GSHELL-31
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-31
Project: GShell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524603
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-31:
Currently xstream is eating up ~360k to handle our very simple xml parsing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-32.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0-alpha-1
Hook up slf4j to the plexus api to bridge logging
29 matches
Mail list logo
