[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283:
Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R
Refactoring a Dynamic Web
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12581833#action_12581833
]
Anish Pathadan commented on GERONIMO-3819:
--
Can anybody please try the patch
Geronimo Revision: 640722 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080325/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080325
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Hi All,
For some time I was involved in updating the JMS Resource portlet
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3819). I have added
following functionalities to this portlet.
1. Browse messages in queue
2.Send messages to Queues/Topics
3.Purge messages from queue.
I would like to
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 21, 2008, at 4:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm trying to help out apacheds with their legal file goo... and they
like us have some copied bouncy castle code.
Ours is in framework/modules/geronimo-crypto. We have the bc
license copied in the LICENSE.txt file which
Thanks a lot. It was the solution. In the documentation which I have, the
local and remote interfaces are shown by remote/remote and
local/local, but substituing those by business-local/business-local
and business-remote/business-remote it works perfectly.
With tags i meant @Local and @Remote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YunFeng Ma updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-285:
Attachment: MultipleSchemaVersionTest.zip
A prototype which can handle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manu T George closed GERONIMO-3806.
---
closing after testing the scenario i have
CLONE -Extraneous WARN messages during deployment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manu T George closed GERONIMO-3936.
---
Resolution: Invalid
This is invalid. I need not change the gbeans. I can use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manu T George updated GERONIMO-3811:
Attachment: (was: openejb.zip)
EjbServer portlet
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manu T George updated GERONIMO-3811:
Attachment: (was: g3811_r632068.patch)
EjbServer portlet
-
File geronimo-web.xml in Geronimo is analog of file context.xml in
Tomcat.
But I know attribute reloadable of tag Context, i didn't find analog
attribute in geronimo-web.xml.
Plzzz, help (:
--
View this message in context:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5) Should we make all samples plugins? At the moment the jsp-examples,
servlet-examples, and ldap-sample-app are plugins. The other 12 samples
are not. I'd be in favor of creating a plugin for each and
One alternative we could use for the samples requiring a database is to
standardize a sample database and use the same one for all the sample
applications.
If we go this way maybe we could have a separate plugin to just create and load
a sample DB and make such plugin a dependency on the other
Geronimo must add Java2 security to run with security manager
-
Key: GERONIMO-3938
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3938
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manu T George updated GERONIMO-3811:
Attachment: g3811_r640786.patch
EjbServer portlet
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12582005#action_12582005
]
Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-3811:
-
Patch attached that makes changes to
Geronimo Revision: 640793 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080325/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080325
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Failing to start plugin after install if previous plugin install failed.
Key: GERONIMO-3939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3939
Project: Geronimo
I keep having some minor annoyances starting from http://
geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html and hope someone who knows
where that page comes from and more about how some of the rest of the
site is set up can fix them.
1. I'd really like a direct link from the documentation front page
David Jencks wrote:
I keep having some minor annoyances starting
from http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html and hope someone who
knows where that page comes from and more about how some of the rest of
the site is set up can fix them.
http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html is
I just added a link on the staging web site (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE).
Look into the Overview menu box, if no one opposes I'll just leave it there
and it will get propagated to the live site in about 1 hour or so.
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I keep having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12582057#action_12582057
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3887:
Update:
Ok good news, so rather than
Hi,
Having played around with Geronimo 2.0.2, Spring and Hibernate a bit
for the last couple of days, I have attached a transaction manager
lookup for Geronimo to the Hibernate JIRA HHH-1368 (
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1368 ).
Considering how simple this
Geronimo is still using ActiveMQ 4 and I've applied patches for or
fixed a few bugs that are fairly important for getting MDBS working
reliably and fixing other problems. So, I'd like to get a release
out of the 4.x branch for the upcoming Geronimo 2.1.1 release.
I've looked through the
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Jonas Andersen wrote:
Hi,
Having played around with Geronimo 2.0.2, Spring and Hibernate a
bit for the last couple of days, I have attached a transaction
manager lookup for Geronimo to the Hibernate JIRA HHH-1368 ( http://
David Jencks wrote:
Geronimo is still using ActiveMQ 4 and I've applied patches for or fixed
a few bugs that are fairly important for getting MDBS working reliably
and fixing other problems. So, I'd like to get a release out of the 4.x
branch for the upcoming Geronimo 2.1.1 release.
I agree
A easy way to create a new server instance via command/gsh/console
--
Key: GERONIMO-3940
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3940
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
Yep, I'd like to see those fixes in 2.1.1, but maybe an ActiveMQ 4.1.2
release that still supports Java 1.4 for existing stand-alone ActiveMQ
users would be the best way to go for now.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
Geronimo is still using ActiveMQ 4 and I've applied patches for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12582110#action_12582110
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3887:
---
I think there are two separate issues at
Geronimo Revision: 641101 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080325/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080325
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
On Mar 25, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Yep, I'd like to see those fixes in 2.1.1, but maybe an ActiveMQ
4.1.2 release that still supports Java 1.4 for existing stand-alone
ActiveMQ users would be the best way to go for now.
I didn't really consider moving to java 5 (which
Folks, over the next few days I'm going to be checking in some changes
to GShell to move towards using the Maven Artifact library to pull
down dependencies,. Have to redo some of the internal plumbing to
make that work, so I might break gshell/trunk from time to time,
though I'll try to
When is G gonna upgrade to AMQ 5?
--jason
On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Yep, I'd like to see those fixes in 2.1.1, but maybe an ActiveMQ
4.1.2 release that still supports Java 1.4 for existing stand-alone
ActiveMQ
If you are using them, just restore the modules. I has thought you
guys has moved 100% to OSGi.
-dain
On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Sorry, I missed that thread.
ServiceMix currently uses xbean-server and xbean-kernel. Not much,
and we
can consider moving to
35 matches
Mail list logo
