[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748681#action_12748681
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4818:
Currently, I think we could configure it ldap in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan reassigned GERONIMO-4801:
--
Assignee: Ivan
it says JACC manager gbean already present when i deploy PlantsByWebSphere
If we build the Geronimo 2.2 on JDK 1.6, it will not run successfully on JDK
1.5.
The reason is that, some security APIs are changed in JDK 1.6, while our
GBean builder will add those public methods as its own operations, and
car-maven-plugin will serialize some gbean related data in the
We want to retain support for Java 5 in 2.2.
-Jack
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:25 PM, chi runhua chirun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, one short question here.
According to Geronimo-4089, G2.2 can be built on Java 6 and it's a new
feature for G2.2.
why are we still using Java 5 for 2.2 branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748693#action_12748693
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4818:
1. If possible, could you re-attach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748694#action_12748694
]
viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-4818:
I think we should update doc also.
Can not
I've been working on osgi-ifying the framework and have gotten near
the point where I have to figure out how to deploy geronimo plugins.
I think that I basically need a temporary Bundle the deployer can use
to load gbean classes. Currently the bundle might have just some
imports or it
Monitoring server via JMX cannot be restarted.
---
Key: GERONIMO-4822
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4822
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lu Jiang updated GERONIMO-4822:
---
Description:
Steps:
1.Click monitor portlet, to monitor a new Server via JMX.
The monitor status
role-based administration capabilities
--
Key: GERONIMO-4823
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4823
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748742#action_12748742
]
Shiny Cheng commented on GERONIMO-4819:
---
Besides, after you have created two
the created graphs can't be listed under view which is created before these
graphs
--
Key: GERONIMO-4824
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4824
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin He updated GERONIMO-4824:
-
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
Description:
1、start server
2、create a ejb server in
Hi all,
I did a quick summary for the updates to be made(already made) in G2.2 doc
so far. Please refer to (1) for more details.
(1). http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/editpage.action?pageId=101669
If I missed any topics, please feel free to append on the table or this
thread.
Jeff
Sorry, here is the correct linkage
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC22/Apache+Geronimo+v2.2+documentation+development+status
Jeff C
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM, chi runhua chirun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I did a quick summary for the updates to be made(already made)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rodger Zhang updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-588:
--
Attachment: updated_gep22_auto_testsuite_fixed.patch
Sorry for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Victor Fang updated GERONIMO-4646:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-4646 2.patch
Warn during a war deployment, if no WEB-INF/web.xml file
can not config geronimo as a service in ubuntu
--
Key: GERONIMO-4825
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4825
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan updated GERONIMO-4713:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Summary: Disable Tomcat JNDI (was: Two warnings when start g server)
Those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan updated GERONIMO-4713:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-4713.patch
Please help to review the patch, thanks !
Disable Tomcat JNDI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748842#action_12748842
]
Forrest Xia commented on GERONIMO-4812:
---
Seems mod_jk does not work with G 2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Forrest Xia updated GERONIMO-4812:
--
Attachment: apache_mod_jk.log
can not configure httpd server
Geronimo Revision: 808871 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090828/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090828/unit-test
I stumbled across the following presentation about Tomcat 7 yesterday,
and I was wondering how much of an impact this will be for Geronimo.
http://people.apache.org/~markt/presentations/2009-04-01-Tomcat7Servlet3.pdf
Here's the list of new items planned for the release.
New for Tomcat 7
It's not clear to me if the valves-to-filters project completed (I
haven't been following the tomcat list closely), but I don't
anticipate that it would cause any problems -- maybe a day of work. I
suspect we can simplify our integration since filters have lifecycle
methods, we won't need
Donald,
I'm glad you are looking into this. I think a reorg would be helpful if
we can generate all of the images we need from a common code base.
Just 2 comments:
- Will you update trunk to 3.0-SNAPSHOT so that we can keep it distinct
from the branch you just created for 2.2?
- Can you
Geronimo Revision: 808972 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090828/build-1400.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090828
[INFO] BUILD
Geronimo Revision: 808987 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090828/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090828
[INFO] BUILD
Geronimo Revision: 809079 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090828/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090828/unit-test
I've been working on my sandbox framework copy on converting to use
osgi, and I've made some progress.
My basic strategy has been to replace plugin classloader usage with
Bundle (and BundleContext) use. This looks like it will work out ok.
Most of the code compiles and unit tests pass and
Geronimo Revision: 809069 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090828/build-2000.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090828
[INFO] BUILD
31 matches
Mail list logo
