[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4810) Predefine a localhost server with some predefined graphs and views

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-4810. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 2.2 2.1.5 Commit the

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 820189

Geronimo Revision: 820189 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 820181

Geronimo Revision: 820181 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090930/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090930 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 820252

Geronimo Revision: 820252 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090930/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090930/unit-test-reports

Upgrade to activemq-protobuf version 1.0?

It looks like all our builds are reliant upon activemq-protobuf version 1.0-Snapshot. Activemq released version 1.0 of activemq-protobuf last week. Should we be upgrading? That should fix the build failures we've been having. ~Jason Warner

Re: Upgrade to activemq-protobuf version 1.0?

From the stack, it seems that activemq-core 5.3-snapshot depends on activemq-protobuf 1.0-snapshot, not Geronimo depends on it directly. One way is to wait the activemq 5.3, or use the exclude in our pom file to use 1.0 temporarily ? 2009/9/30 Jason Warner jaw...@gmail.com It looks like all our

Re: Upgrade to activemq-protobuf version 1.0?

Ah, ok. Thanks for catching that. That'll teach me to look at things on a wednesday morning. ~Jason Warner On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote: From the stack, it seems that activemq-core 5.3-snapshot depends on activemq-protobuf 1.0-snapshot, not Geronimo depends

Re: put XSD schemas on G web

Hi Radim, You may find XSD files under geronimo_home/schema directory. I didn't look into the code to find out whether schema validation was done against local .xsd files. I am not sure if it's necessary to put these schema files in text/xml format on G website if validation happens on local.

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 820258

Geronimo Revision: 820258 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/unit-test

Re: put XSD schemas on G web

Ellen Tang-2 wrote: Ellen, I can't open the URL in your email: http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geonimo-module-1.2.xsdhttp://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd Is there any typo in there? There is no typo, but these XSD files are not at that URL yet. My message was

Re: Wiki link to current version page

I think it's the problem of the template in auto-export plugin, but only confluence admin could do some configuration to update the template. Jeff C On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Ellen Tang ltang.el...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Juergen, I guess that could be a good thing to do. We'll discuss

Re: Wiki link to current version page

I've tried to find the page of the same topic (Daytrader) in documentation v2.1 by changing the link directly from http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/daytrader.html to http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/daytrader.html . The page does open and has correct contents, but when I tried to find the link

Re: Wiki link to current version page

Fixing the links doesn't seem to be the general solution, e.g. with geronimo ra.xml and I'm feeling lucky you get the 1.1 docs, even if google knows the 2.1 docs. There should be a friendly big red box on old pages There exists a more recent version of this page with a link to it. Greetings,

Re: OSGI progress

I've been looking into how to create an RFC 66 implementation that can deploy to whatever the Geronimo-hosted web container happens to be. One issue that seems to keep popping up is crossing the bridge between GBeans and OSGi. A lot (ok, all really) that deal with the server runtime and

Re: OSGI progress

I was just looking at David's framework code and it looks like there is already a way to inject a bundle or bundleContext into a gbean. It works just like injecting the kernel or classLoader attributes. I'm just looking at the code at this point so I don't really know if it works right or not.

Re: OSGI progress

On Sep 30, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I've been looking into how to create an RFC 66 implementation that can deploy to whatever the Geronimo-hosted web container happens to be. One issue that seems to keep popping up is crossing the bridge between GBeans and OSGi. A lot (ok,

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 820365

Geronimo Revision: 820365 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090930/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090930/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 820389

Geronimo Revision: 820389 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/unit-test

Re: put XSD schemas on G web

On Sep 30, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Radim Kolar wrote: Ellen Tang-2 wrote: Ellen, I can't open the URL in your email: http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geonimo-module-1.2.xsdhttp://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geronimo-module-1.2.xsd Is there any typo in there? There is no typo, but these XSD

[VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and geronimo-valdiation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5 for OpenJPA

The OpenJPA project will be releasing a 2.0.0-M3 release next week and needs tagged versions of the JPA2 and Bean Validation spec APIs. This vote is for the following TWO releases, which are based on early drafts of the specs, which we are now allowed to release.

[DISCUSS] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and geronimo-valdiation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5 for OpenJPA

Discussion thread for the vote -Donald

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 820499

Geronimo Revision: 820499 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090930/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090930/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 820502

Geronimo Revision: 820502 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090930/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and geronimo-valdiation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5 for OpenJPA

My +1. Passed rat and ianal checks. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: The OpenJPA project will be releasing a 2.0.0-M3 release next week and needs tagged versions of the JPA2 and Bean Validation spec APIs. This vote is for the following TWO releases, which are based on early drafts of the