Thanks, Quinitin Beukes, could ypu please open a JIRA for it ? and if
possible, attach your diff file to the JIRA.
2009/10/12 Quintin Beukes quin...@last.za.net
Hey,
I found the cause of the test failure.
In the file: {src
While compiling the geronimo-kernel module, do you run it with mvn
install, so that the geronimo-kernel jar file could be installed to the
local repository. Or geronimo-boilerplate module could not package the
latest jar file.
Wish it helps !
2009/10/11 Quintin Beukes quin...@skywalk.co.za
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Jain reassigned GERONIMO-4900:
-
Assignee: Ashish Jain
MissingDependencyException while deploying EAR in Clustering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764582#action_12764582
]
Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4900:
---
I was able to simulate this issue. While
The web console that required this dependency is from the ActiveMQ project,
not the default activemq console of Geronimo, and by default it is not
shipped with Geronimo binary build. IMO, adding this dependency should not
affect us too much.
2009/10/9 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
The latest
Geronimo Revision: 824210 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091012/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091012
[INFO] BUILD
Hello Gianny,
I see you have suggested that you were able to figure out the problem. Can
you please suggest what is the problem? Is there any workaround for this
issue?
Any associated JIRA's???
There is another JIRA which has been opened for a similar issue. Please have
a look at the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764643#action_12764643
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-4900:
-
This problem is due to the
NumberFormatException upon installing the shaded subprojects - asm and reflect
- into Apache Felix 2.0.0
Key: XBEAN-141
URL:
Ivan wrote:
After building many 3-rd parties libries locally, I got the same error
that Jarek found, luckily, it seems that the error INFO
[DeploymentContext] The Strict Manifest Classpath is not the root
cause, after setting karaf.home property, the build process could
continue , But, I
Hi Ashish,
I added a comment to GERONIMO-4900. This problem should have been
fixed as part of 2.1.4; unfortunately, it seems that the fix was
applied to trunk after the creation of the 2.1.4 branch. Could you
please confirm that this works OK against trunk?
Regarding the Tomcat bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764661#action_12764661
]
Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4900:
---
Helllo Gianny, thanks for pointing this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764662#action_12764662
]
Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4900:
---
import
David Jencks wrote:
I only have a minute so can't address anything in detail right now.
Most of the servicemix bundle dependencies can probably be on released
versions. I went for speed and used the ones from my checked out
servicemix trunk in case I needed to patch them.
I don't think we
No problem.
Quintin Beukes
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Quinitin Beukes, could ypu please open a JIRA for it ? and if
possible, attach your diff file to the JIRA.
2009/10/12 Quintin Beukes quin...@last.za.net
Hey,
I found the cause of the test
Hi Gianny,
Did you mean that the Missing Dependency Exception will be fixed by the code
snippet suggested by you. I had build the new jar
geronimo-tomcat6-clustering-builder-wadi-2.1.4.jar and replaced the
existing one in g214 with this new one. Started two clean instances of g214
with replaced
I think I understand now that the code snippet suggested by you will help
fix the GBean Not Found exception. Please suggest if this is correct.
However the Missing Dependency Exception
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException: Missing
dependency:
Jetty Advanced Integration Test Failure
---
Key: GERONIMO-4903
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4903
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Quintin Beukes updated GERONIMO-4903:
-
Attachment: jetty-advanced-test-failure.patch
attached the patch to fix the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4903:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Assignee: Donald Woods
Geronimo Revision: 824305 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091012/build-0800.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091012
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764726#action_12764726
]
Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4795:
---
Please advice if this approach is
On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:36 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I only have a minute so can't address anything in detail right now.
Most of the servicemix bundle dependencies can probably be on
released versions. I went for speed and used the ones from my
checked out servicemix
I think this particular problem is caused by running on windows. In
MockBundleContext just before this line I manipulate the location to
remove cruft from the beginning. I think we need to add some more
tests to remove windows specific cruft. Since I don't have a windows
machine I'm not
David Jencks wrote:
I think this particular problem is caused by running on windows. In
MockBundleContext just before this line I manipulate the location to
remove cruft from the beginning. I think we need to add some more
tests to remove windows specific cruft. Since I don't have a windows
David Jencks wrote:
I think this particular problem is caused by running on windows. In
MockBundleContext just before this line I manipulate the location to
remove cruft from the beginning. I think we need to add some more
tests to remove windows specific cruft. Since I don't have a windows
Hey,
Yes. I do build the kernel before the boilerplate, and that does help
get it into the boilerplate. Thanks.
Though, let me rephrase. I'm missing what step is needed to get the
assembly to use the new geronimo-kernel.jar, because it doesn't seem
to take it even if the boilerplate's .car file
Geronimo Revision: 824442 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091012/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091012/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 824322 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091012/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091012
[INFO] BUILD
Time to start a new thread, I think. I'm getting further now. The
framework builds, but I'm getting errors trying to build the configs. I
get an IOException attempting to build the J2EE System config (see
below). The file in question is
java.io.IOException: Referenced file does not exist:
Geronimo Revision: 824456 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091012/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091012/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 824545 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091012/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091012/unit-test-reports
Once I fixed my manifest problem I ran into this problem as well. But
somehow I bypassed it by building the config modules individually...
Then I ran into the problem that Ivan reported. I think I just fixed
that problem as well and got a little bit further.
Jarek
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:11
Btw, I've been using Maven 2.0.10 to build the framework but I'm
getting better results with 2.2.1.
Jarek
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Once I fixed my manifest problem I ran into this problem as well. But
somehow I bypassed it by building the config
34 matches
Mail list logo
