[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 834794

2009-11-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 834794 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/unit-test

Apply for editor access of geronimo docs

2009-11-11 Thread wenting wang
Hi, I would like to contribute to geronimo docs.So please help me to get the editor access. I've already signed the iclas file.And my name is Wen Ting Wang in unlisted clas.My account is wwtvane...@gmail.com. Please approve. Thank you very much. Vanessa Wang

Blueprint MBean progress

2009-11-11 Thread Rex Wang
Hi, Dear all, I just created my floder rex underneath sandbox to post the current design of BlueprintMBean. If anyone is interesting about it, you can checkout and help give us some review comments :-) You can get the definition by svn co

Re: Mbeans for Blueprint

2009-11-11 Thread Rex Wang
Thanks Kevan! Looks like there was some problems on my windows.. Now I get it work. -Rex 2009/11/10 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Rex Wang wrote: Hi dear all, The BlueprintMBean design has finished. I'd like to put the api codes in sandbox and request

Re: [Discussion]Re-org admin console

2009-11-11 Thread chi runhua
Thanks for the discussion. I filed a JIRA to track usability improvement in G3.0 for now. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4950 Jeff C On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, chi runhua chirun...@gmail.com wrote: If there is no objection, I'd like to file a JIRA to record the

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4949) getting error while taking the build

2009-11-11 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12776396#action_12776396 ] Forrest Xia commented on GERONIMO-4949: --- Seems to me you used a long windows path

Re: Strange dependency problem building jaxws

2009-11-11 Thread Rick McGuire
David Jencks wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: David Jencks wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 7:59 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: There are two subprojects in the jaxws plugin that I'm having trouble building, and I can't figure out why. The cause of the failure is a resolution

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 834884

2009-11-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 834884 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/unit-test

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
Thanks for documenting this Jeff. Hopefully this will be a temporary work-around which can later be removed once things are fixed in the repository. Which brings me to the next point - what can be done to really fix this? I guess Sun owns this repo? We could push to get the redirect

Geronimo 3.0 xmlbeans package naming conventions.

2009-11-11 Thread Rick McGuire
I ran into a problem this morning with the openejb clustering plugins with the xmlbeans generated classes. This plugin was using the package org.apache.geronimo.xbeans.geronimo. Unfortunately, this package is also used by the geronimo-connector-builder-1_6 plugin, which results in two

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Kevan Miller
Forwarding to dev list thread, also... --kevan On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Fei LI wrote: Hi, I am exhausted and decide to give up. If you really want to help me out, please remove your local repo completely, build from the ground and

missing dependencies on ibiblio

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
Has anybody else noticed that there are a number of our dependencies that are no longer available on ibiblio? I first noticed this with ejb 3.1.2 artifacts which are available on repo1/2 but not ibiblio. Today I noticed that this is also the case for our tranql connectors 1.4. I hit a few

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
I've also verified that this work-around will get Geronimo 2.2 building again. So I've now built both 2.1.4 and 2.2 from clean repos (using different jdk's, and maven versions) with the referenced addition to settings.xml. To break it down by Geronimo version: 2.2:

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 835040

2009-11-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 835040 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/unit-test

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
I've also been successful building branches/2.1 with Donald's most recent change to revert back to genesis 1.3.1 and the mirror for java.net in my settings.xml as mentioned earlier. here's the details for 2.1: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1 Maven 2.0.10 jdk

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-599) Compilation on x86_64 systems, simplifications of the build.xml files, Eclipse 3.5.1, testsuite fixes

2009-11-11 Thread Johannes Weberhofer (JIRA)
Compilation on x86_64 systems, simplifications of the build.xml files, Eclipse 3.5.1, testsuite fixes - Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-599 URL:

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-599) Compilation on x86_64 systems, simplifications of the build.xml files, Eclipse 3.5.1, testsuite fixes

2009-11-11 Thread Johannes Weberhofer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Johannes Weberhofer updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-599: - Attachment: gep-x86_64_and_simplifications.patch

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for documenting this Jeff. Hopefully this will be a temporary work-around which can later be removed once things are fixed in the repository. Which brings me to the next point - what can be done to really fix this? I guess Sun owns

OpenJPA 2.0.0-M3 plugins available for Geronimo 2.1.3 thru 2.2-SNAPSHOT servers

2009-11-11 Thread Donald Woods
For those of you wanting to try out JPA2 in Apache Geronimo before the JSR-317 spec is finalized and before our 3.0 release, now you can. I've created a set of plugins - Geronimo Plugins, OpenJPA2 :: CAR Geronimo Plugins, OpenJPA2 :: Deployer that use the OpenJPA 2.0.0-M3 release [1],

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 835189

2009-11-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 835189 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/2009/unit-test

RE: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Fei LI
Hi, My build of Geronimo server branch 2.2 is successful. Great. Thanks a lot to Keven, Donald, Joe, Jeff and Forrest https://webmail.mda.ca/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo.html This is a big system and I need some time to learn it.

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4949) getting error while taking the build

2009-11-11 Thread sneha manjrekar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12776822#action_12776822 ] sneha manjrekar commented on GERONIMO-4949: --- Hi, Thanks for your update i

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread chi runhua
Congratulation~! Feel free to drop an email if you have any other questions. We'd love to help you learn Geronimo. Jeff On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Fei LI f...@mdacorporation.com wrote: Hi, My build of Geronimo server branch 2.2 is successful. Great. Thanks a lot to Keven,

Re: Blueprint MBean progress

2009-11-11 Thread Jarek Gawor
Rex, This is a good start and I think this discussion and code should be happening in Aries. But I do have a few comments/questions: 1) The BEAN_METADATA_TYPE should contain the ARGUMENT_TYPE and PROPERTY_TYPE to mimic the BeanMetadata structure. Therefore, the getBeanArguments() and

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4947) Geronimo performance

2009-11-11 Thread Jean-Jacques Parent (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12776885#action_12776885 ] Jean-Jacques Parent commented on GERONIMO-4947: --- Thanks for your feedback