Geronimo Revision: 886061 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091202/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091202/unit-test-reports
It is not a problem, that because the content of this tree entry you
clicked is really a big one, and need some time to construct. Just click
continue and wait a while.
-Rex
2009/12/1 Juergen Weber
>
> Hi,
>
> I played a bit with
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
Being different with 6.0.20, Tomcat trunk is under development, how to keep
our codes are consistent with Tomcat's , Or, we just keep it temporarily for
integrating our own patches ?
2009/12/2 David Jencks
> I wonder if we should figure out a way to use tomcat trunk rather than our
> modifiec 6
Hi,
In the plugin enabling work, we always need to exclude those non-bundle
depdencies, and add the bundlized ones somewhere.
But for those bundlized 3rd componenets which would publish by Geronimo
in the folder framework/bundles, I think we may have two ways, take
org.apache.geronimo.bundl
I wonder if we should figure out a way to use tomcat trunk rather than
our modifiec 6.0,20. They are presumably making some progress on
servlet 3.0 and there are definitely some fixes we could use for
instance the recent problem I fixed where jasper assumed all
classloaders are URLClas
Enable Axis2 plugin in Geronimo 3.0
---
Key: GERONIMO-4967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4967
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects
Geronimo Revision: 886032 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 886025 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/unit-test-reports
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:27 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> If you mean the previous main geronimo releases, I strongly disagree. We
> have no reason I can see to avoid following maven defaults here. With the
> exception of the main geronimo release, previously done through an arcane and
> IMO inco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12784451#action_12784451
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4753:
I added the following to server-log4j.p
Geronimo Revision: 885900 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 885862 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/unit-test-reports
Hi,
I played a bit with
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5-2.2-bin.tar.gz
When I tried to open a tree entry (All -> Geronimo) in the JMX viewer,
Firefox 3.5.5 stopped the scr
Hi,
Just found wonden-impl-dom places org.apache.xerces.parsers in its
import packages list, after scanning the codes, it is not required,
actually, in the previous 2.2 release, we do not ship xerces-impl. So,
temporarily, I suggest to re-build our own woden-impl-dom bundle.
Any comment ?
--
Geronimo Revision: 885762 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test
Geronimo Revision: 885755 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091201/unit-test-reports
There might be something wired with my machine, but I'm seeing the below
error when starting the release candidate in Windows XP with IBM JDK 1.5.
Module 59/75 org.apache.geronimo.configs/activemq-ra/2.2/car
2009-12-01 17:52:00,562 ERROR [OpenEjbSystemGBean]
Unable to
deploy m
When using a Monitoring Vie in the Console with the names
Request Time CurrentTime - 60 minute
Connections Duration Count - 60 minute
I get the Warning
2009-12-01 10:24:52,159 WARN [SnapshotDBHelper] Statistics name
'Connections Duration Count' does not exist
2009-12-01 10:34:00,776 WARN [Snaps
After 2.2 is released, you should see a "Plug-in" item in the left
navigation tree of the admin console and in that page you will be able to
install procrun from the online 2.2 repository.
If you need a quick solution, just download the files in the below location
and put into /bin.
http://svn.ap
Geronimo Revision: 885685 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091201/unit-test
20 matches
Mail list logo