On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:27 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > If you mean the previous main geronimo releases, I strongly disagree. We > have no reason I can see to avoid following maven defaults here. With the > exception of the main geronimo release, previously done through an arcane and > IMO incomprehensible process, everything we've released in the last year or > so has used the release plugin default tag locations of > <artifactid>-<version>.
I favor consistency with past releases. So, fall on the other side of the fence. Following maven's default is simply following an arbitrary decision that maven made. 'geronimo-2.2' seems to hold little value to anyone... All that said, I'm not going to argue with you. Once the source problems (that I've fixed in branches/2.2) are fixed, looks like I'll be +1. Until then, I'm -1. I've also added a work-around to avoid the annoying WARN log messages from DWR in branches/2.2. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=885952&view=rev Wouldn't mind seeing that picked up, but it's not necessary... --kevan
