I find there are huge useless messages when building a G3.0 plugin, Is there
something like this:
*mvn clean install -Dlog4j.configuration=./target/classes/log4j.properties
*
so that I could pass following config to the log system ?
JavaEE6 sample - JPA 2.0 - Criteria API
---
Key: GERONIMO-5266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5266
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Geronimo Revision: 936628 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lu Jiang updated GERONIMO-5235:
---
Attachment: 5235.patch
Patch is ready.
Forrest,could you help to review and commit it?
Thanks in
Hi All,
How can I get dump of Apache Geronimo Documentation ?
I would like to use documentation @ offline.
Thank You
Much Respect
Vijaya Kumar Reddy.Maddela
vijay.re...@eaiesb.in
Mobile:9704179993|40-40119993
US:978-306-3751
UK:173-730-6078
www.eaiesb.in
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
been updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and
Geronimo Revision: 936823 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YING WANG updated GERONIMO-5259:
Attachment: 5259.patch
Please help review this patch. Thanks a lot.
Annoying access denied
I've been working on moving the org.apache.geronimo.bundles components
out of the server tree into its own top-level project so these bundles
can be released separately. The working copy can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/trunk
One issue is how the legal
On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I've been working on moving the org.apache.geronimo.bundles components out of
the server tree into its own top-level project so these bundles can be
released separately. The working copy can be found here:
Rick,
The list of bundles can be trimmed down. I don't we need asm*, log4j,
openwebbeans*, ldapsdk. Also, we don't need to release the axis bundle
at this point (there might be more in the same situation). Hopefully,
this should simply things a bit.
Jarek
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Rick
1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
Shouldn't it be -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
4/16), so I did that for you.
3) The JPA spec below should be
Yep, quick test looked good.
+1
-Donald
On 4/21/10 2:00 PM, Ashish Jain wrote:
Build went fine, project imports went fine, able to start/stop server,
tested couple of apps with IBM Java5/Java6 with eclipse galileo sr2. My +1.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Delos dait...@gmail.com
On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
Shouldn't it be -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
4/16), so I did
So why not release it as version=1.1 and we'll spin a 1.1.1 if more
updates are required? Not sure why we need to version it as a Milestone
release Is there a TCK required? If so, why not upgrade 2.1.5 or
2.2.1-SNAPSHOT to use the new level and verify it still passes the Java
EE 5 TCKs?
Ok, I've put together a set of items that need to be completed for the
M1 release. Here are the items I'm aware of:
Ok, the following things need to be done:
1) Get the specs released (up for vote now)
2) Release the various Geronimo subprojects the server is dependent upon
- Geronimo
David,
I'm pretty sure I've fixed this problem now. Let me know if you are
still seeing this.
Jarek
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Running the tck uses enormous amounts of disk space. I ran a segment of the
tck on an external disk with enough
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4680.
--
Resolution: Fixed
rev 937007 restores the filter-transformer-by classloader behavior. This
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, I've put together a set of items that need to be completed for the M1
release. Here are the items I'm aware of:
Ok, the following things need to be done:
1) Get the specs released (up for vote now)
2) Release the various Geronimo
I agree, 1.1 is the best version. I'm not sure I want to try to get the
appropriate tck tests running in 2.2, but if anyone else is game.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
So why not release it as version=1.1 and we'll spin a 1.1.1 if more
updates are
Signature/checksums look good. I ran RAT and built successfully. Will leave the
testing for others. Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 18, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Delos wrote:
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse
Plugin 2.1.5 RC1.
The source code zip is here:
Here are 3 scripts attached to help checkout, rat:check and build the
tags in the vote.
Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
Geronimo Revision: 937015 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422
[INFO] BUILD
+1.
I built Geronimo with the updated specs and ran tck smoketests and all
looks good to me.
Jarek
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo
For Tomcat, I would first try to pull the latest codes today, then we could
begin for the release
2010/4/23 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, I've put together a set of items that need to be completed for the M1
release. Here are the
Any documents that we plan to announce together with M1 release, for
example, how to build the Tomcat assembly, how to deploy Aries Blog sample
application, a brief introduction of how Geronimo is integrated with OSGi
Framework or any other topics? if so, we might need to create a new wiki
space
Great job, Delos !
+1
2010/4/23 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Signature/checksums look good. I ran RAT and built successfully. Will leave
the testing for others. Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 18, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Delos wrote:
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release of
+1
Did some testing on this RC1 with eclipse 3.5.2 java ee build, everything
looks fine, thanks Delos!
Forrest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chi Runhua resolved GERONIMO-5255.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The instructions are ready at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chi Runhua resolved GERONIMO-5241.
--
Resolution: Fixed
status update. The doc is ready now.
Doc: the usage of Kerberoes realm
Geronimo Revision: 937123 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100422
[INFO] BUILD
Doc: the usages of deploy/encrpt and deploy/unlockKeystore command
--
Key: GERONIMO-5267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5267
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chi Runhua updated GERONIMO-5258:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.1.5
(was: 2.2)
Doc: commands to a Secure JMX
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB and
HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading related
code changes from previous yoko releases.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-013/
Tag:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chi Runhua updated GERONIMO-5241:
-
Summary: Doc: the usage of Kerberos realm in Geronimo (was: Doc: the usage
of Kerberoes
35 matches
Mail list logo
